ExternalVendorCode/openwrt
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt.git synced 2024-12-19 13:48:06 +00:00
Code Issues Actions 6 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

kernel: 3.18: Fix patch 644 dependency chain

Browse Source 
This patch introduces some code that is compiled in whenever
CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER is built, with the code called from code compiled under
CONFIG_BRIDGE, CONFIG_BRIDGE_IGMP_SNOOPING or CONFIG_BRIDGE_NF_EBTABLES.

Unfortunately, these options aren't setting explicitly the dependency they now
have on CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER, for obvious reasons for CONFIG_BRIDGE.

However, this is not working really well when CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER is built
as a module, since code statically compiled will now use a function that is not
in the kernel image, which makes the linker grumpy.

Solve this by removing the option to build CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER as a module,
and protect our function definition by an IS_BUILTIN instead of a IS_ENABLED
macro. This fixes the issue for CONFIG_BRIDGE and CONFIG_BRIDGE_IGMP_SNOOPING.

Fixing CONFIG_BRIDGE_NF_EBTABLES has to be handled a bit differently, since it
directly references a variable that will not be declared if
CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER is not set. Protect the variable affectations by an
ifdef to make sure this doesn't happen.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>

SVN-Revision: 43419
This commit is contained in:
Florian Fainelli 2014-11-28 01:29:51 +00:00
parent 6cc4c6a3a1
commit d73dc14957
1 changed files with 31 additions and 14 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

45
target/linux/generic/patches-3.18/644-bridge_optimize_netfilter_hooks.patch
View File

@ -96,22 +96,17 @@
if (vlan_tx_tag_present(skb))
--- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
+++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
@@ -769,15 +769,29 @@ static inline int br_vlan_enabled(struct
/* br_netfilter.c */
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER)
+extern int brnf_call_ebtables;
int br_nf_core_init(void);
void br_nf_core_fini(void);
void br_netfilter_rtable_init(struct net_bridge *);
+bool br_netfilter_run_hooks(void);
#else
static inline int br_nf_core_init(void) { return 0; }
static inline void br_nf_core_fini(void) {}
@@ -778,6 +778,24 @@ static inline void br_nf_core_fini(void)
#define br_netfilter_rtable_init(x)
+#define br_netfilter_run_hooks() false
#endif
+#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER)
+extern int brnf_call_ebtables;
+bool br_netfilter_run_hooks(void);
+#else
+#define br_netfilter_run_hooks() false
+#endif
+
+static inline int
+BR_HOOK(uint8_t pf, unsigned int hook, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ struct net_device *in, struct net_device *out,
@ -139,17 +134,39 @@
--- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
+++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
@@ -2414,11 +2414,13 @@ static int __init ebtables_init(void)
@@ -2414,11 +2414,19 @@ static int __init ebtables_init(void)
}
printk(KERN_INFO "Ebtables v2.0 registered\n");
+
+#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER)
+ brnf_call_ebtables = 1;
+#endif
+
return 0;
}
static void __exit ebtables_fini(void)
{
+#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER)
+ brnf_call_ebtables = 0;
+#endif
nf_unregister_sockopt(&ebt_sockopts);
xt_unregister_target(&ebt_standard_target);
printk(KERN_INFO "Ebtables v2.0 unregistered\n");
--- a/net/Kconfig
+++ b/net/Kconfig
@@ -177,11 +177,11 @@ config NETFILTER_ADVANCED
If unsure, say Y.
config BRIDGE_NETFILTER
- tristate "Bridged IP/ARP packets filtering"
+ bool "Bridged IP/ARP packets filtering"
depends on BRIDGE
depends on NETFILTER && INET
depends on NETFILTER_ADVANCED
- default m
+ default y
---help---
Enabling this option will let arptables resp. iptables see bridged
ARP resp. IP traffic. If you want a bridging firewall, you probably