bcm53xx: backport clk driver fix for DT nodes names

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
(cherry picked from commit 77d9cce604)

target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-5.4/083-v6.0-clk-iproc-Do-not-rely-on-node-name-for-correct-PLL-s.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+From 1b24a132eba7a1c19475ba2510ec1c00af3ff914 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
+Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 09:15:03 -0700
+Subject: [PATCH] clk: iproc: Do not rely on node name for correct PLL setup
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+
+After commit 31fd9b79dc58 ("ARM: dts: BCM5301X: update CRU block
+description") a warning from clk-iproc-pll.c was generated due to a
+duplicate PLL name as well as the console stopped working. Upon closer
+inspection it became clear that iproc_pll_clk_setup() used the Device
+Tree node unit name as an unique identifier as well as a parent name to
+parent all clocks under the PLL.
+
+BCM5301X was the first platform on which that got noticed because of the
+DT node unit name renaming but the same assumptions hold true for any
+user of the iproc_pll_clk_setup() function.
+
+The first 'clock-output-names' property is always guaranteed to be
+unique as well as providing the actual desired PLL clock name, so we
+utilize that to register the PLL and as a parent name of all children
+clock.
+
+Fixes: 5fe225c105fd ("clk: iproc: add initial common clock support")
+Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
+Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220905161504.1526-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com
+Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
+---
+ drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c | 12 ++++++++----
+ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c
++++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c
+@@ -736,6 +736,7 @@ void iproc_pll_clk_setup(struct device_n
+ 	const char *parent_name;
+ 	struct iproc_clk *iclk_array;
+ 	struct clk_hw_onecell_data *clk_data;
++	const char *clk_name;
+ 
+ 	if (WARN_ON(!pll_ctrl) || WARN_ON(!clk_ctrl))
+ 		return;
+@@ -783,7 +784,12 @@ void iproc_pll_clk_setup(struct device_n
+ 	iclk = &iclk_array[0];
+ 	iclk->pll = pll;
+ 
+-	init.name = node->name;
++	ret = of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names",
++					    0, &clk_name);
++	if (WARN_ON(ret))
++		goto err_pll_register;
++
++	init.name = clk_name;
+ 	init.ops = &iproc_pll_ops;
+ 	init.flags = 0;
+ 	parent_name = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, 0);
+@@ -803,13 +809,11 @@ void iproc_pll_clk_setup(struct device_n
+ 		goto err_pll_register;
+ 
+ 	clk_data->hws[0] = &iclk->hw;
++	parent_name = clk_name;
+ 
+ 	/* now initialize and register all leaf clocks */
+ 	for (i = 1; i < num_clks; i++) {
+-		const char *clk_name;
+-
+ 		memset(&init, 0, sizeof(init));
+-		parent_name = node->name;
+ 
+ 		ret = of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names",
+ 						    i, &clk_name);