ExternalVendorCode/openwrt
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt.git synced 2024-12-24 15:56:49 +00:00
Code Issues Actions 5 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

kernel: remove upstreamed patch from 4.19

Browse Source 
This patch applies cleanly, so it doesn't cause errors while rebasing
patches. It results in redifinition of inode_still_linked, causing build
to fail when ubifs is enabled. Drop the patch.

Fixes: a37098a2d0 ("kernel: bump 4.19 to 4.19.16")
Reported-by: Deng Qingfang <dengqf6@mail2.sysu.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Stijn Tintel <stijn@linux-ipv6.be>
This commit is contained in:
Stijn Tintel 2019-01-17 10:39:34 +02:00
parent f4ebd1ead0
commit 59e62809e6
1 changed files with 0 additions and 89 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

89
target/linux/generic/backport-4.19/500-ubifs-Handle-re-linking-of-inodes-correctly-while-re.patch
View File

@ -1,89 +0,0 @@
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 23:04:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ubifs: Handle re-linking of inodes correctly while recovery
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
UBIFS's recovery code strictly assumes that a deleted inode will never
come back, therefore it removes all data which belongs to that inode
as soon it faces an inode with link count 0 in the replay list.
Before O_TMPFILE this assumption was perfectly fine. With O_TMPFILE
it can lead to data loss upon a power-cut.
Consider a journal with entries like:
0: inode X (nlink = 0) /* O_TMPFILE was created */
1: data for inode X /* Someone writes to the temp file */
2: inode X (nlink = 0) /* inode was changed, xattr, chmod, … */
3: inode X (nlink = 1) /* inode was re-linked via linkat() */
Upon replay of entry #2 UBIFS will drop all data that belongs to inode X,
this will lead to an empty file after mounting.
As solution for this problem, scan the replay list for a re-link entry
before dropping data.
Fixes: 474b93704f32 ("ubifs: Implement O_TMPFILE")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Russell Senior <russell@personaltelco.net>
Cc: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Russell Senior <russell@personaltelco.net>
Reported-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
---
fs/ubifs/replay.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/ubifs/replay.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/replay.c
@@ -242,6 +242,38 @@ static bool inode_still_linked(struct ub
}
/**
+ * inode_still_linked - check whether inode in question will be re-linked.
+ * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
+ * @rino: replay entry to test
+ *
+ * O_TMPFILE files can be re-linked, this means link count goes from 0 to 1.
+ * This case needs special care, otherwise all references to the inode will
+ * be removed upon the first replay entry of an inode with link count 0
+ * is found.
+ */
+static bool inode_still_linked(struct ubifs_info *c, struct replay_entry *rino)
+{
+ struct replay_entry *r;
+
+ ubifs_assert(c, rino->deletion);
+ ubifs_assert(c, key_type(c, &rino->key) == UBIFS_INO_KEY);
+
+ /*
+ * Find the most recent entry for the inode behind @rino and check
+ * whether it is a deletion.
+ */
+ list_for_each_entry_reverse(r, &c->replay_list, list) {
+ ubifs_assert(c, r->sqnum >= rino->sqnum);
+ if (key_inum(c, &r->key) == key_inum(c, &rino->key))
+ return r->deletion == 0;
+
+ }
+
+ ubifs_assert(c, 0);
+ return false;
+}
+
+/**
* apply_replay_entry - apply a replay entry to the TNC.
* @c: UBIFS file-system description object
* @r: replay entry to apply
@@ -270,6 +302,11 @@ static int apply_replay_entry(struct ubi
if (inode_still_linked(c, r)) {
err = 0;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (inode_still_linked(c, r)) {
+ err = 0;
break;
}