mirror of
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt.git
synced 2024-12-29 10:08:59 +00:00
65 lines
2.8 KiB
Diff
65 lines
2.8 KiB
Diff
|
From 7708f7471ab45039e08237b42121d0372f9216a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||
|
From: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
|
||
|
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 23:42:19 -0500
|
||
|
Subject: [PATCH 043/117] hwspinlock: sun6i: Clarify bank counting logic
|
||
|
|
||
|
In some of the most recent datasheets, the register definition was
|
||
|
updated in a way that resolves the conflict here: the field is only two
|
||
|
bits wide, and a value of "4" really means a bit pattern of "0". Correct
|
||
|
the code to reflect this, but leave an updated comment because some
|
||
|
datasheets still have incorrect information in them.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Fixes: 3c881e05c814 ("hwspinlock: add sun6i hardware spinlock support")
|
||
|
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
|
||
|
---
|
||
|
drivers/hwspinlock/sun6i_hwspinlock.c | 36 +++++++++++----------------
|
||
|
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
|
||
|
|
||
|
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/sun6i_hwspinlock.c
|
||
|
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/sun6i_hwspinlock.c
|
||
|
@@ -129,30 +129,22 @@ static int sun6i_hwspinlock_probe(struct
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
- * bit 28 and 29 represents the hwspinlock setup
|
||
|
+ * Bits 28 and 29 represent the number of available locks.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
- * every datasheet (A64, A80, A83T, H3, H5, H6 ...) says the default value is 0x1 and 0x1
|
||
|
- * to 0x4 represent 32, 64, 128 and 256 locks
|
||
|
- * but later datasheets (H5, H6) say 00, 01, 10, 11 represent 32, 64, 128 and 256 locks,
|
||
|
- * but that would mean H5 and H6 have 64 locks, while their datasheets talk about 32 locks
|
||
|
- * all the time, not a single mentioning of 64 locks
|
||
|
- * the 0x4 value is also not representable by 2 bits alone, so some datasheets are not
|
||
|
- * correct
|
||
|
- * one thing have all in common, default value of the sysstatus register is 0x10000000,
|
||
|
- * which results in bit 28 being set
|
||
|
- * this is the reason 0x1 is considered being 32 locks and bit 30 is taken into account
|
||
|
- * verified on H2+ (datasheet 0x1 = 32 locks) and H5 (datasheet 01 = 64 locks)
|
||
|
+ * The datasheets have two conflicting interpretations for these bits:
|
||
|
+ * | 00 | 01 | 10 | 11 |
|
||
|
+ * +-----+----+-----+-----+
|
||
|
+ * | 256 | 32 | 64 | 128 | A80, A83T, H3, A64, A50, D1
|
||
|
+ * | 32 | 64 | 128 | 256 | H5, H6, R329
|
||
|
+ * where some datasheets use "4" instead of "0" for the first column.
|
||
|
+ *
|
||
|
+ * Experiments shows that the first interpretation is correct, as all
|
||
|
+ * known implementations report the value "1" and have 32 spinlocks.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
- num_banks = readl(io_base + SPINLOCK_SYSSTATUS_REG) >> 28;
|
||
|
- switch (num_banks) {
|
||
|
- case 1 ... 4:
|
||
|
- priv->nlocks = 1 << (4 + num_banks);
|
||
|
- break;
|
||
|
- default:
|
||
|
- err = -EINVAL;
|
||
|
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unsupported hwspinlock setup (%d)\n", num_banks);
|
||
|
- goto bank_fail;
|
||
|
- }
|
||
|
+ num_banks = readl(io_base + SPINLOCK_SYSSTATUS_REG) >> 28 & 0x3;
|
||
|
+ if (!num_banks)
|
||
|
+ num_banks = 4;
|
||
|
+ priv->nlocks = 1 << (4 + num_banks);
|
||
|
|
||
|
priv->bank = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, struct_size(priv->bank, lock, priv->nlocks),
|
||
|
GFP_KERNEL);
|