openwrt/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar7161_netgear_wndr.dtsi

220 lines
3.7 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR MIT
#include "ar7100.dtsi"
#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
#include <dt-bindings/mtd/partitions/uimage.h>
/ {
aliases {
led-boot = &led_power_orange;
led-failsafe = &led_power_orange;
led-running = &led_power_green;
led-upgrade = &led_power_orange;
};
extosc: ref {
compatible = "fixed-clock";
#clock-cells = <0>;
clock-output-names = "ref";
clock-frequency = <40000000>;
};
reset-leds {
compatible = "reset-leds";
usb_led {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "green:usb";
resets = <&rst 12>;
trigger-sources = <&usb_ohci_port>, <&usb_ehci_port>;
linux,default-trigger = "usbport";
};
};
leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
wps {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "orange:wps";
gpios = <&gpio 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
led_power_green: power_green {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "green:power";
gpios = <&gpio 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
led_power_orange: power_orange {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "orange:power";
gpios = <&gpio 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
default-state = "on";
};
wps_green {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "green:wps";
gpios = <&gpio 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
wan_green {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "green:wan";
gpios = <&gpio 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
};
ath9k-leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
wlan2g {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "green:wlan2g";
gpios = <&ath9k0 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
linux,default-trigger = "phy0tpt";
};
wlan5g {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "blue:wlan5g";
gpios = <&ath9k1 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
linux,default-trigger = "phy1tpt";
};
};
keys {
compatible = "gpio-keys";
wps {
label = "wps";
linux,code = <KEY_WPS_BUTTON>;
gpios = <&gpio 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
reset {
label = "reset";
linux,code = <KEY_RESTART>;
gpios = <&gpio 8 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
rfkill {
label = "rfkill";
linux,code = <KEY_RFKILL>;
gpios = <&gpio 11 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
};
rtl8366s {
compatible = "realtek,rtl8366s";
gpio-sda = <&gpio 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
gpio-sck = <&gpio 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
mdio-bus {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
status = "okay";
phy4: ethernet-phy@4 {
reg = <4>;
phy-mode = "rgmii";
};
};
};
};
&usb_phy {
status = "okay";
};
&usb1 {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
status = "okay";
usb_ohci_port: port@1 {
reg = <1>;
#trigger-source-cells = <0>;
};
};
&usb2 {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
status = "okay";
usb_ehci_port: port@1 {
reg = <1>;
#trigger-source-cells = <0>;
};
};
&pcie0 {
status = "okay";
ath9k0: wifi@0,11 {
compatible = "pci168c,0029";
reg = <0x8800 0 0 0 0>;
#gpio-cells = <2>;
gpio-controller;
ath79: wndr3700 series: fix wifi range & throughput This patch adds ar71xx's GPIO setup for the 2.4GHz and 5GHz antennae demultiplexer: | 158 /* 2.4 GHz uses the first fixed antenna group (1, 0, 1, 0) */ | 159 ap9x_pci_setup_wmac_gpio(0, (0xf << 6), (0xa << 6)); | 160 | 161 /* 5 GHz uses the second fixed antenna group (0, 1, 1, 0) */ | 162 ap9x_pci_setup_wmac_gpio(1, (0xf << 6), (0x6 << 6)); This should restore the range and throughput of the 2.4GHz radio on all the derived wndr3700 variants and versions with the AR7161 SoC. A special case is the 5GHz radio. The original wndr3700(v1) will benefit from this change. However the wndr3700v2 and later revisions were unaffected by the missing bits, as there is no demultiplexer present in the later designs. This patch uses gpio-hogs within the device-tree for all wndr3700/wndr3800/wndrmac variants. Notes: Based on the PCB pictures, the WNDR3700(v1) really had eight independent antennae. Four antennae for each radio and all of those were printed on the circut board. The WNDR3700v2 and later have just six antennae. Four of those are printed on the circuit board and serve the 2.4GHz radio. Whereas the remaining two are special 5GHz Rayspan Patch Antennae which are directly connected to the 5GHz radio. Hannu Nyman dug pretty deep and unearthed a treasure of information regarding the history of how these values came to be in the OpenWrt archives: <https://dev.archive.openwrt.org/ticket/6533.html>. Mark Mentovai came across the fixed antenna group when he was looking into the driver: fixed_antenna_group 1, (0, 1, 0, 1) fixed_antenna_group 2, (0, 1, 1, 0) fixed_antenna_group 3, (1, 0, 0, 1) fixed_antenna_group 4, (1, 0, 1, 0) Fixes: FS#3088 Reported-by: Luca Bensi Reported-by: Maciej Mazur Reported-by: Hannu Nyman <hannu.nyman@iki.fi> Debugged-by: Hannu Nyman <hannu.nyman@iki.fi> Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>
2020-06-07 20:57:46 +00:00
/* all WNDR3700 variants have four antennae dedicated
* to the 2.4GHz radio. Two antennae are available for
* each chain. The following configuration is the
* default setting which taken from the vendor's wifi
* code for that radio.
*
* All possible options [GPIO6,GPIO7,GPIO8,GPIO9]:
* [0,1,0,1], [0,1,1,0], [1,0,0,1], [1,0,1,0]
*/
antenna-demux {
gpio-hog;
line-name = "fixed antenna group 1";
gpios = <6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>,
<7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>,
<8 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>,
<9 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
output-high;
};
};
ath9k1: wifi@0,12 {
compatible = "pci168c,0029";
reg = <0x9000 0 0 0 0>;
#gpio-cells = <2>;
gpio-controller;
};
};
&spi {
status = "okay";
flash@0 {
compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
reg = <0>;
spi-max-frequency = <25000000>;
partitions: partitions {
compatible = "fixed-partitions";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
};
};
};
&eth0 {
status = "okay";
pll-data = <0x11110000 0x00001099 0x00991099>;
fixed-link {
speed = <1000>;
full-duplex;
};
};
&eth1 {
status = "okay";
pll-data = <0x11110000 0x00001099 0x00991099>;
phy-handle = <&phy4>;
};