2018-08-11 11:47:21 +00:00
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR MIT
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-25 19:52:57 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "ar7100.dtsi"
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-11 11:47:21 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
|
2021-01-20 17:36:51 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <dt-bindings/mtd/partitions/uimage.h>
|
2018-08-11 11:47:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/ {
|
|
|
|
aliases {
|
2019-11-05 18:23:33 +00:00
|
|
|
led-boot = &led_power_orange;
|
|
|
|
led-failsafe = &led_power_orange;
|
|
|
|
led-running = &led_power_green;
|
|
|
|
led-upgrade = &led_power_orange;
|
2018-08-11 11:47:21 +00:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
extosc: ref {
|
|
|
|
compatible = "fixed-clock";
|
|
|
|
#clock-cells = <0>;
|
|
|
|
clock-output-names = "ref";
|
|
|
|
clock-frequency = <40000000>;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reset-leds {
|
|
|
|
compatible = "reset-leds";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
usb_led {
|
ath79: remove model name from LED labels
Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme
modelname:color:function
However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually
entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the
contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in
several aspects:
- We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible
- We have various exceptions where not the model name is used,
but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track
and justify even for core-developers
- Having model-based components will not allow to share
identical LED definitions in DTSI files
- The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates
several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from
ar71xx where this was even more messy
Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property
entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and
function properties separately. However, the implementation does
not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or
match our requirements in the foreseeable future.
However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function
properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs
will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and
if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal
device, like "phy1:amber:status".
With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop
the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate
a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips),
and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed
the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely
useless subject to take care of for device support review and
maintenance.
To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple
migration routine is added unconditionally.
Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel
for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have
labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part
labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
|
|
|
label = "green:usb";
|
2018-08-11 11:47:21 +00:00
|
|
|
resets = <&rst 12>;
|
2019-12-07 16:37:31 +00:00
|
|
|
trigger-sources = <&usb_ohci_port>, <&usb_ehci_port>;
|
2018-08-11 11:47:21 +00:00
|
|
|
linux,default-trigger = "usbport";
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2019-11-05 18:23:33 +00:00
|
|
|
leds {
|
2018-08-11 11:47:21 +00:00
|
|
|
compatible = "gpio-leds";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wps {
|
ath79: remove model name from LED labels
Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme
modelname:color:function
However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually
entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the
contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in
several aspects:
- We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible
- We have various exceptions where not the model name is used,
but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track
and justify even for core-developers
- Having model-based components will not allow to share
identical LED definitions in DTSI files
- The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates
several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from
ar71xx where this was even more messy
Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property
entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and
function properties separately. However, the implementation does
not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or
match our requirements in the foreseeable future.
However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function
properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs
will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and
if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal
device, like "phy1:amber:status".
With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop
the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate
a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips),
and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed
the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely
useless subject to take care of for device support review and
maintenance.
To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple
migration routine is added unconditionally.
Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel
for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have
labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part
labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
|
|
|
label = "orange:wps";
|
2018-08-11 11:47:21 +00:00
|
|
|
gpios = <&gpio 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2019-11-05 18:23:33 +00:00
|
|
|
led_power_green: power_green {
|
ath79: remove model name from LED labels
Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme
modelname:color:function
However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually
entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the
contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in
several aspects:
- We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible
- We have various exceptions where not the model name is used,
but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track
and justify even for core-developers
- Having model-based components will not allow to share
identical LED definitions in DTSI files
- The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates
several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from
ar71xx where this was even more messy
Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property
entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and
function properties separately. However, the implementation does
not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or
match our requirements in the foreseeable future.
However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function
properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs
will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and
if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal
device, like "phy1:amber:status".
With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop
the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate
a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips),
and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed
the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely
useless subject to take care of for device support review and
maintenance.
To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple
migration routine is added unconditionally.
Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel
for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have
labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part
labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
|
|
|
label = "green:power";
|
2018-08-11 11:47:21 +00:00
|
|
|
gpios = <&gpio 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2019-11-05 18:23:33 +00:00
|
|
|
led_power_orange: power_orange {
|
ath79: remove model name from LED labels
Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme
modelname:color:function
However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually
entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the
contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in
several aspects:
- We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible
- We have various exceptions where not the model name is used,
but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track
and justify even for core-developers
- Having model-based components will not allow to share
identical LED definitions in DTSI files
- The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates
several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from
ar71xx where this was even more messy
Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property
entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and
function properties separately. However, the implementation does
not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or
match our requirements in the foreseeable future.
However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function
properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs
will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and
if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal
device, like "phy1:amber:status".
With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop
the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate
a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips),
and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed
the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely
useless subject to take care of for device support review and
maintenance.
To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple
migration routine is added unconditionally.
Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel
for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have
labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part
labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
|
|
|
label = "orange:power";
|
2018-08-11 11:47:21 +00:00
|
|
|
gpios = <&gpio 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
|
2018-08-14 12:55:15 +00:00
|
|
|
default-state = "on";
|
2018-08-11 11:47:21 +00:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wps_green {
|
ath79: remove model name from LED labels
Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme
modelname:color:function
However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually
entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the
contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in
several aspects:
- We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible
- We have various exceptions where not the model name is used,
but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track
and justify even for core-developers
- Having model-based components will not allow to share
identical LED definitions in DTSI files
- The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates
several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from
ar71xx where this was even more messy
Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property
entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and
function properties separately. However, the implementation does
not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or
match our requirements in the foreseeable future.
However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function
properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs
will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and
if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal
device, like "phy1:amber:status".
With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop
the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate
a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips),
and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed
the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely
useless subject to take care of for device support review and
maintenance.
To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple
migration routine is added unconditionally.
Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel
for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have
labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part
labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
|
|
|
label = "green:wps";
|
2018-08-11 11:47:21 +00:00
|
|
|
gpios = <&gpio 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wan_green {
|
ath79: remove model name from LED labels
Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme
modelname:color:function
However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually
entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the
contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in
several aspects:
- We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible
- We have various exceptions where not the model name is used,
but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track
and justify even for core-developers
- Having model-based components will not allow to share
identical LED definitions in DTSI files
- The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates
several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from
ar71xx where this was even more messy
Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property
entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and
function properties separately. However, the implementation does
not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or
match our requirements in the foreseeable future.
However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function
properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs
will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and
if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal
device, like "phy1:amber:status".
With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop
the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate
a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips),
and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed
the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely
useless subject to take care of for device support review and
maintenance.
To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple
migration routine is added unconditionally.
Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel
for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have
labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part
labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
|
|
|
label = "green:wan";
|
2018-08-11 11:47:21 +00:00
|
|
|
gpios = <&gpio 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-13 20:10:47 +00:00
|
|
|
ath9k-leds {
|
|
|
|
compatible = "gpio-leds";
|
2019-11-05 18:23:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-08-13 20:10:47 +00:00
|
|
|
wlan2g {
|
ath79: remove model name from LED labels
Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme
modelname:color:function
However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually
entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the
contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in
several aspects:
- We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible
- We have various exceptions where not the model name is used,
but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track
and justify even for core-developers
- Having model-based components will not allow to share
identical LED definitions in DTSI files
- The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates
several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from
ar71xx where this was even more messy
Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property
entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and
function properties separately. However, the implementation does
not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or
match our requirements in the foreseeable future.
However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function
properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs
will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and
if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal
device, like "phy1:amber:status".
With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop
the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate
a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips),
and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed
the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely
useless subject to take care of for device support review and
maintenance.
To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple
migration routine is added unconditionally.
Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel
for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have
labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part
labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
|
|
|
label = "green:wlan2g";
|
2018-08-13 20:10:47 +00:00
|
|
|
gpios = <&ath9k0 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
|
|
|
|
linux,default-trigger = "phy0tpt";
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
wlan5g {
|
ath79: remove model name from LED labels
Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme
modelname:color:function
However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually
entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the
contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in
several aspects:
- We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible
- We have various exceptions where not the model name is used,
but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track
and justify even for core-developers
- Having model-based components will not allow to share
identical LED definitions in DTSI files
- The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates
several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from
ar71xx where this was even more messy
Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property
entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and
function properties separately. However, the implementation does
not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or
match our requirements in the foreseeable future.
However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function
properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs
will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and
if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal
device, like "phy1:amber:status".
With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop
the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate
a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips),
and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed
the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely
useless subject to take care of for device support review and
maintenance.
To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple
migration routine is added unconditionally.
Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel
for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have
labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part
labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
|
|
|
label = "blue:wlan5g";
|
2018-08-13 20:10:47 +00:00
|
|
|
gpios = <&ath9k1 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
|
|
|
|
linux,default-trigger = "phy1tpt";
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2018-12-30 11:17:25 +00:00
|
|
|
keys {
|
2019-05-18 11:30:19 +00:00
|
|
|
compatible = "gpio-keys";
|
2018-08-11 11:47:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wps {
|
|
|
|
label = "wps";
|
|
|
|
linux,code = <KEY_WPS_BUTTON>;
|
|
|
|
gpios = <&gpio 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reset {
|
|
|
|
label = "reset";
|
|
|
|
linux,code = <KEY_RESTART>;
|
|
|
|
gpios = <&gpio 8 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rfkill {
|
|
|
|
label = "rfkill";
|
|
|
|
linux,code = <KEY_RFKILL>;
|
|
|
|
gpios = <&gpio 11 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rtl8366s {
|
|
|
|
compatible = "realtek,rtl8366s";
|
2019-11-05 18:23:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-08-11 11:47:21 +00:00
|
|
|
gpio-sda = <&gpio 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
|
|
|
|
gpio-sck = <&gpio 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mdio-bus {
|
|
|
|
#address-cells = <1>;
|
|
|
|
#size-cells = <0>;
|
|
|
|
status = "okay";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
phy4: ethernet-phy@4 {
|
|
|
|
reg = <4>;
|
|
|
|
phy-mode = "rgmii";
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
&usb_phy {
|
|
|
|
status = "okay";
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
&usb1 {
|
|
|
|
#address-cells = <1>;
|
|
|
|
#size-cells = <0>;
|
|
|
|
status = "okay";
|
|
|
|
|
2019-12-07 16:37:31 +00:00
|
|
|
usb_ohci_port: port@1 {
|
2018-08-11 11:47:21 +00:00
|
|
|
reg = <1>;
|
|
|
|
#trigger-source-cells = <0>;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
&usb2 {
|
|
|
|
#address-cells = <1>;
|
|
|
|
#size-cells = <0>;
|
|
|
|
status = "okay";
|
|
|
|
|
2019-12-07 16:37:31 +00:00
|
|
|
usb_ehci_port: port@1 {
|
2018-08-11 11:47:21 +00:00
|
|
|
reg = <1>;
|
|
|
|
#trigger-source-cells = <0>;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
&pcie0 {
|
|
|
|
status = "okay";
|
2018-08-13 20:10:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ath9k0: wifi@0,11 {
|
|
|
|
compatible = "pci168c,0029";
|
2018-08-15 15:53:48 +00:00
|
|
|
reg = <0x8800 0 0 0 0>;
|
2021-08-18 18:06:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-08-13 20:10:47 +00:00
|
|
|
#gpio-cells = <2>;
|
|
|
|
gpio-controller;
|
ath79: wndr3700 series: fix wifi range & throughput
This patch adds ar71xx's GPIO setup for the 2.4GHz and 5GHz antennae
demultiplexer:
| 158 /* 2.4 GHz uses the first fixed antenna group (1, 0, 1, 0) */
| 159 ap9x_pci_setup_wmac_gpio(0, (0xf << 6), (0xa << 6));
| 160
| 161 /* 5 GHz uses the second fixed antenna group (0, 1, 1, 0) */
| 162 ap9x_pci_setup_wmac_gpio(1, (0xf << 6), (0x6 << 6));
This should restore the range and throughput of the 2.4GHz radio
on all the derived wndr3700 variants and versions with the AR7161 SoC.
A special case is the 5GHz radio. The original wndr3700(v1) will
benefit from this change. However the wndr3700v2 and later revisions
were unaffected by the missing bits, as there is no demultiplexer
present in the later designs.
This patch uses gpio-hogs within the device-tree for all
wndr3700/wndr3800/wndrmac variants.
Notes:
Based on the PCB pictures, the WNDR3700(v1) really had eight
independent antennae. Four antennae for each radio and all of
those were printed on the circut board.
The WNDR3700v2 and later have just six antennae. Four of those
are printed on the circuit board and serve the 2.4GHz radio.
Whereas the remaining two are special 5GHz Rayspan Patch Antennae
which are directly connected to the 5GHz radio.
Hannu Nyman dug pretty deep and unearthed a treasure of information
regarding the history of how these values came to be in the OpenWrt
archives: <https://dev.archive.openwrt.org/ticket/6533.html>.
Mark Mentovai came across the fixed antenna group when he was looking
into the driver:
fixed_antenna_group 1, (0, 1, 0, 1)
fixed_antenna_group 2, (0, 1, 1, 0)
fixed_antenna_group 3, (1, 0, 0, 1)
fixed_antenna_group 4, (1, 0, 1, 0)
Fixes: FS#3088
Reported-by: Luca Bensi
Reported-by: Maciej Mazur
Reported-by: Hannu Nyman <hannu.nyman@iki.fi>
Debugged-by: Hannu Nyman <hannu.nyman@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>
2020-06-07 20:57:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* all WNDR3700 variants have four antennae dedicated
|
|
|
|
* to the 2.4GHz radio. Two antennae are available for
|
|
|
|
* each chain. The following configuration is the
|
|
|
|
* default setting which taken from the vendor's wifi
|
|
|
|
* code for that radio.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* All possible options [GPIO6,GPIO7,GPIO8,GPIO9]:
|
|
|
|
* [0,1,0,1], [0,1,1,0], [1,0,0,1], [1,0,1,0]
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
antenna-demux {
|
|
|
|
gpio-hog;
|
|
|
|
line-name = "fixed antenna group 1";
|
|
|
|
gpios = <6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>,
|
|
|
|
<7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>,
|
|
|
|
<8 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>,
|
|
|
|
<9 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
|
|
|
|
output-high;
|
|
|
|
};
|
2018-08-13 20:10:47 +00:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ath9k1: wifi@0,12 {
|
|
|
|
compatible = "pci168c,0029";
|
2018-08-15 15:53:48 +00:00
|
|
|
reg = <0x9000 0 0 0 0>;
|
2021-08-18 18:06:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-08-13 20:10:47 +00:00
|
|
|
#gpio-cells = <2>;
|
|
|
|
gpio-controller;
|
|
|
|
};
|
2018-08-11 11:47:21 +00:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
&spi {
|
|
|
|
status = "okay";
|
2019-11-05 18:23:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-08-11 11:47:21 +00:00
|
|
|
flash@0 {
|
|
|
|
compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
|
|
|
|
reg = <0>;
|
|
|
|
spi-max-frequency = <25000000>;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
partitions: partitions {
|
|
|
|
compatible = "fixed-partitions";
|
|
|
|
#address-cells = <1>;
|
|
|
|
#size-cells = <1>;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ð0 {
|
|
|
|
status = "okay";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pll-data = <0x11110000 0x00001099 0x00991099>;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fixed-link {
|
|
|
|
speed = <1000>;
|
|
|
|
full-duplex;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ð1 {
|
|
|
|
status = "okay";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pll-data = <0x11110000 0x00001099 0x00991099>;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
phy-handle = <&phy4>;
|
|
|
|
};
|