openwrt/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar9344_teltonika_rut955-h7v3c0.dts

197 lines
3.4 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

ath79: add support for Teltonika RUT955 H7V3C0 This board was previously supported in ar71xx as 'RUT9XX'. The difference between that and the other RUT955 board already supported in ath79 is that instead of the SPI shift registers driving the LEDs and digital outputs that model got an I2C GPIO expander instead. To support LEDs during early boot and interrupt-driven digital inputs, I2C support as well as support for PCA953x has to be built-in and cannot be kernel modules, hence select those symbols for ath79/generic. Specification: - 550/400/200 MHz (CPU/DDR/AHB) - 128 MB of RAM (DDR2) - 16 MB of FLASH (SPI NOR) - 4x 10/100 Mbps Ethernet, with passive PoE support on LAN1 - 2T2R 2,4 GHz (AR9344) - built-in 4G/3G module (example: Quectel EC-25EU) - internal microSD slot (spi-mmc, buggy and disabled for now) - RS232 on D-Sub9 port (Cypress ACM via USB, /dev/ttyACM0) - RS422/RS485 (AR934x high speed UART, /dev/ttyATH1) - analog 0-24V input (MCP3221) - various digital inputs and outputs incl. a relay - 11x LED (4 are driven by AR9344, 7 by PCA9539) - 2x miniSIM slot (can be swapped via GPIO) - 2x RP-SMA/F (Wi-Fi), 3x SMA/F (2x WWAN, GPS) - 1x button (reset) - DC jack for main power input (9-30 V) - debugging UART available on PCB edge connector Serial console (/dev/ttyS0) pinout: - RX: pin1 (square) on top side of the main PCB (AR9344 is on top) - TX: pin1 (square) on bottom side Flash instruction: Vendor firmware is based on OpenWrt CC release. Use the "factory" image directly in GUI (make sure to uncheck "keep settings") or in U-Boot web based recovery. To avoid any problems, make sure to first update vendor firmware to latest version - "factory" image was successfully tested on device running "RUT9XX_R_00.06.051" firmware and U-Boot "3.0.1". Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
2020-04-29 19:59:04 +00:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR MIT
#include "ar9344_teltonika_rut9xx.dtsi"
#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
/ {
model = "Teltonika RUT955 H7V3C0";
compatible = "teltonika,rut955-h7v3c0", "teltonika,rut9xx", "qca,ar9344";
aliases {
led-boot = &led_system_green;
led-failsafe = &led_system_red;
led-running = &led_system_green;
led-upgrade = &led_system_red;
};
leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
signal0 {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "green:signal0";
ath79: add support for Teltonika RUT955 H7V3C0 This board was previously supported in ar71xx as 'RUT9XX'. The difference between that and the other RUT955 board already supported in ath79 is that instead of the SPI shift registers driving the LEDs and digital outputs that model got an I2C GPIO expander instead. To support LEDs during early boot and interrupt-driven digital inputs, I2C support as well as support for PCA953x has to be built-in and cannot be kernel modules, hence select those symbols for ath79/generic. Specification: - 550/400/200 MHz (CPU/DDR/AHB) - 128 MB of RAM (DDR2) - 16 MB of FLASH (SPI NOR) - 4x 10/100 Mbps Ethernet, with passive PoE support on LAN1 - 2T2R 2,4 GHz (AR9344) - built-in 4G/3G module (example: Quectel EC-25EU) - internal microSD slot (spi-mmc, buggy and disabled for now) - RS232 on D-Sub9 port (Cypress ACM via USB, /dev/ttyACM0) - RS422/RS485 (AR934x high speed UART, /dev/ttyATH1) - analog 0-24V input (MCP3221) - various digital inputs and outputs incl. a relay - 11x LED (4 are driven by AR9344, 7 by PCA9539) - 2x miniSIM slot (can be swapped via GPIO) - 2x RP-SMA/F (Wi-Fi), 3x SMA/F (2x WWAN, GPS) - 1x button (reset) - DC jack for main power input (9-30 V) - debugging UART available on PCB edge connector Serial console (/dev/ttyS0) pinout: - RX: pin1 (square) on top side of the main PCB (AR9344 is on top) - TX: pin1 (square) on bottom side Flash instruction: Vendor firmware is based on OpenWrt CC release. Use the "factory" image directly in GUI (make sure to uncheck "keep settings") or in U-Boot web based recovery. To avoid any problems, make sure to first update vendor firmware to latest version - "factory" image was successfully tested on device running "RUT9XX_R_00.06.051" firmware and U-Boot "3.0.1". Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
2020-04-29 19:59:04 +00:00
gpios = <&gpio_ext 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
};
signal1 {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "green:signal1";
ath79: add support for Teltonika RUT955 H7V3C0 This board was previously supported in ar71xx as 'RUT9XX'. The difference between that and the other RUT955 board already supported in ath79 is that instead of the SPI shift registers driving the LEDs and digital outputs that model got an I2C GPIO expander instead. To support LEDs during early boot and interrupt-driven digital inputs, I2C support as well as support for PCA953x has to be built-in and cannot be kernel modules, hence select those symbols for ath79/generic. Specification: - 550/400/200 MHz (CPU/DDR/AHB) - 128 MB of RAM (DDR2) - 16 MB of FLASH (SPI NOR) - 4x 10/100 Mbps Ethernet, with passive PoE support on LAN1 - 2T2R 2,4 GHz (AR9344) - built-in 4G/3G module (example: Quectel EC-25EU) - internal microSD slot (spi-mmc, buggy and disabled for now) - RS232 on D-Sub9 port (Cypress ACM via USB, /dev/ttyACM0) - RS422/RS485 (AR934x high speed UART, /dev/ttyATH1) - analog 0-24V input (MCP3221) - various digital inputs and outputs incl. a relay - 11x LED (4 are driven by AR9344, 7 by PCA9539) - 2x miniSIM slot (can be swapped via GPIO) - 2x RP-SMA/F (Wi-Fi), 3x SMA/F (2x WWAN, GPS) - 1x button (reset) - DC jack for main power input (9-30 V) - debugging UART available on PCB edge connector Serial console (/dev/ttyS0) pinout: - RX: pin1 (square) on top side of the main PCB (AR9344 is on top) - TX: pin1 (square) on bottom side Flash instruction: Vendor firmware is based on OpenWrt CC release. Use the "factory" image directly in GUI (make sure to uncheck "keep settings") or in U-Boot web based recovery. To avoid any problems, make sure to first update vendor firmware to latest version - "factory" image was successfully tested on device running "RUT9XX_R_00.06.051" firmware and U-Boot "3.0.1". Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
2020-04-29 19:59:04 +00:00
gpios = <&gpio_ext 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
};
signal2 {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "green:signal2";
ath79: add support for Teltonika RUT955 H7V3C0 This board was previously supported in ar71xx as 'RUT9XX'. The difference between that and the other RUT955 board already supported in ath79 is that instead of the SPI shift registers driving the LEDs and digital outputs that model got an I2C GPIO expander instead. To support LEDs during early boot and interrupt-driven digital inputs, I2C support as well as support for PCA953x has to be built-in and cannot be kernel modules, hence select those symbols for ath79/generic. Specification: - 550/400/200 MHz (CPU/DDR/AHB) - 128 MB of RAM (DDR2) - 16 MB of FLASH (SPI NOR) - 4x 10/100 Mbps Ethernet, with passive PoE support on LAN1 - 2T2R 2,4 GHz (AR9344) - built-in 4G/3G module (example: Quectel EC-25EU) - internal microSD slot (spi-mmc, buggy and disabled for now) - RS232 on D-Sub9 port (Cypress ACM via USB, /dev/ttyACM0) - RS422/RS485 (AR934x high speed UART, /dev/ttyATH1) - analog 0-24V input (MCP3221) - various digital inputs and outputs incl. a relay - 11x LED (4 are driven by AR9344, 7 by PCA9539) - 2x miniSIM slot (can be swapped via GPIO) - 2x RP-SMA/F (Wi-Fi), 3x SMA/F (2x WWAN, GPS) - 1x button (reset) - DC jack for main power input (9-30 V) - debugging UART available on PCB edge connector Serial console (/dev/ttyS0) pinout: - RX: pin1 (square) on top side of the main PCB (AR9344 is on top) - TX: pin1 (square) on bottom side Flash instruction: Vendor firmware is based on OpenWrt CC release. Use the "factory" image directly in GUI (make sure to uncheck "keep settings") or in U-Boot web based recovery. To avoid any problems, make sure to first update vendor firmware to latest version - "factory" image was successfully tested on device running "RUT9XX_R_00.06.051" firmware and U-Boot "3.0.1". Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
2020-04-29 19:59:04 +00:00
gpios = <&gpio_ext 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
};
signal3 {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "green:signal3";
ath79: add support for Teltonika RUT955 H7V3C0 This board was previously supported in ar71xx as 'RUT9XX'. The difference between that and the other RUT955 board already supported in ath79 is that instead of the SPI shift registers driving the LEDs and digital outputs that model got an I2C GPIO expander instead. To support LEDs during early boot and interrupt-driven digital inputs, I2C support as well as support for PCA953x has to be built-in and cannot be kernel modules, hence select those symbols for ath79/generic. Specification: - 550/400/200 MHz (CPU/DDR/AHB) - 128 MB of RAM (DDR2) - 16 MB of FLASH (SPI NOR) - 4x 10/100 Mbps Ethernet, with passive PoE support on LAN1 - 2T2R 2,4 GHz (AR9344) - built-in 4G/3G module (example: Quectel EC-25EU) - internal microSD slot (spi-mmc, buggy and disabled for now) - RS232 on D-Sub9 port (Cypress ACM via USB, /dev/ttyACM0) - RS422/RS485 (AR934x high speed UART, /dev/ttyATH1) - analog 0-24V input (MCP3221) - various digital inputs and outputs incl. a relay - 11x LED (4 are driven by AR9344, 7 by PCA9539) - 2x miniSIM slot (can be swapped via GPIO) - 2x RP-SMA/F (Wi-Fi), 3x SMA/F (2x WWAN, GPS) - 1x button (reset) - DC jack for main power input (9-30 V) - debugging UART available on PCB edge connector Serial console (/dev/ttyS0) pinout: - RX: pin1 (square) on top side of the main PCB (AR9344 is on top) - TX: pin1 (square) on bottom side Flash instruction: Vendor firmware is based on OpenWrt CC release. Use the "factory" image directly in GUI (make sure to uncheck "keep settings") or in U-Boot web based recovery. To avoid any problems, make sure to first update vendor firmware to latest version - "factory" image was successfully tested on device running "RUT9XX_R_00.06.051" firmware and U-Boot "3.0.1". Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
2020-04-29 19:59:04 +00:00
gpios = <&gpio_ext 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
};
signal4 {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "green:signal4";
ath79: add support for Teltonika RUT955 H7V3C0 This board was previously supported in ar71xx as 'RUT9XX'. The difference between that and the other RUT955 board already supported in ath79 is that instead of the SPI shift registers driving the LEDs and digital outputs that model got an I2C GPIO expander instead. To support LEDs during early boot and interrupt-driven digital inputs, I2C support as well as support for PCA953x has to be built-in and cannot be kernel modules, hence select those symbols for ath79/generic. Specification: - 550/400/200 MHz (CPU/DDR/AHB) - 128 MB of RAM (DDR2) - 16 MB of FLASH (SPI NOR) - 4x 10/100 Mbps Ethernet, with passive PoE support on LAN1 - 2T2R 2,4 GHz (AR9344) - built-in 4G/3G module (example: Quectel EC-25EU) - internal microSD slot (spi-mmc, buggy and disabled for now) - RS232 on D-Sub9 port (Cypress ACM via USB, /dev/ttyACM0) - RS422/RS485 (AR934x high speed UART, /dev/ttyATH1) - analog 0-24V input (MCP3221) - various digital inputs and outputs incl. a relay - 11x LED (4 are driven by AR9344, 7 by PCA9539) - 2x miniSIM slot (can be swapped via GPIO) - 2x RP-SMA/F (Wi-Fi), 3x SMA/F (2x WWAN, GPS) - 1x button (reset) - DC jack for main power input (9-30 V) - debugging UART available on PCB edge connector Serial console (/dev/ttyS0) pinout: - RX: pin1 (square) on top side of the main PCB (AR9344 is on top) - TX: pin1 (square) on bottom side Flash instruction: Vendor firmware is based on OpenWrt CC release. Use the "factory" image directly in GUI (make sure to uncheck "keep settings") or in U-Boot web based recovery. To avoid any problems, make sure to first update vendor firmware to latest version - "factory" image was successfully tested on device running "RUT9XX_R_00.06.051" firmware and U-Boot "3.0.1". Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
2020-04-29 19:59:04 +00:00
gpios = <&gpio_ext 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
};
led_system_red: system_red {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "red:system";
ath79: add support for Teltonika RUT955 H7V3C0 This board was previously supported in ar71xx as 'RUT9XX'. The difference between that and the other RUT955 board already supported in ath79 is that instead of the SPI shift registers driving the LEDs and digital outputs that model got an I2C GPIO expander instead. To support LEDs during early boot and interrupt-driven digital inputs, I2C support as well as support for PCA953x has to be built-in and cannot be kernel modules, hence select those symbols for ath79/generic. Specification: - 550/400/200 MHz (CPU/DDR/AHB) - 128 MB of RAM (DDR2) - 16 MB of FLASH (SPI NOR) - 4x 10/100 Mbps Ethernet, with passive PoE support on LAN1 - 2T2R 2,4 GHz (AR9344) - built-in 4G/3G module (example: Quectel EC-25EU) - internal microSD slot (spi-mmc, buggy and disabled for now) - RS232 on D-Sub9 port (Cypress ACM via USB, /dev/ttyACM0) - RS422/RS485 (AR934x high speed UART, /dev/ttyATH1) - analog 0-24V input (MCP3221) - various digital inputs and outputs incl. a relay - 11x LED (4 are driven by AR9344, 7 by PCA9539) - 2x miniSIM slot (can be swapped via GPIO) - 2x RP-SMA/F (Wi-Fi), 3x SMA/F (2x WWAN, GPS) - 1x button (reset) - DC jack for main power input (9-30 V) - debugging UART available on PCB edge connector Serial console (/dev/ttyS0) pinout: - RX: pin1 (square) on top side of the main PCB (AR9344 is on top) - TX: pin1 (square) on bottom side Flash instruction: Vendor firmware is based on OpenWrt CC release. Use the "factory" image directly in GUI (make sure to uncheck "keep settings") or in U-Boot web based recovery. To avoid any problems, make sure to first update vendor firmware to latest version - "factory" image was successfully tested on device running "RUT9XX_R_00.06.051" firmware and U-Boot "3.0.1". Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
2020-04-29 19:59:04 +00:00
gpios = <&gpio_ext 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
};
led_system_green: system_green {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "green:system";
ath79: add support for Teltonika RUT955 H7V3C0 This board was previously supported in ar71xx as 'RUT9XX'. The difference between that and the other RUT955 board already supported in ath79 is that instead of the SPI shift registers driving the LEDs and digital outputs that model got an I2C GPIO expander instead. To support LEDs during early boot and interrupt-driven digital inputs, I2C support as well as support for PCA953x has to be built-in and cannot be kernel modules, hence select those symbols for ath79/generic. Specification: - 550/400/200 MHz (CPU/DDR/AHB) - 128 MB of RAM (DDR2) - 16 MB of FLASH (SPI NOR) - 4x 10/100 Mbps Ethernet, with passive PoE support on LAN1 - 2T2R 2,4 GHz (AR9344) - built-in 4G/3G module (example: Quectel EC-25EU) - internal microSD slot (spi-mmc, buggy and disabled for now) - RS232 on D-Sub9 port (Cypress ACM via USB, /dev/ttyACM0) - RS422/RS485 (AR934x high speed UART, /dev/ttyATH1) - analog 0-24V input (MCP3221) - various digital inputs and outputs incl. a relay - 11x LED (4 are driven by AR9344, 7 by PCA9539) - 2x miniSIM slot (can be swapped via GPIO) - 2x RP-SMA/F (Wi-Fi), 3x SMA/F (2x WWAN, GPS) - 1x button (reset) - DC jack for main power input (9-30 V) - debugging UART available on PCB edge connector Serial console (/dev/ttyS0) pinout: - RX: pin1 (square) on top side of the main PCB (AR9344 is on top) - TX: pin1 (square) on bottom side Flash instruction: Vendor firmware is based on OpenWrt CC release. Use the "factory" image directly in GUI (make sure to uncheck "keep settings") or in U-Boot web based recovery. To avoid any problems, make sure to first update vendor firmware to latest version - "factory" image was successfully tested on device running "RUT9XX_R_00.06.051" firmware and U-Boot "3.0.1". Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
2020-04-29 19:59:04 +00:00
gpios = <&gpio_ext 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
default-state = "on";
};
};
};
&gpio {
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&jtag_disable_pins>;
gpio-line-names = "RS485_D", "led_wan", "wmac_lna", "mmc_cs",
"EXT_INT", "", "", "",
"", "", "", "",
"", "led_lan2", "led_lan1", "",
"i2c_scl", "i2c_sda", "", "",
"", "", "led_lan3", "",
"", "", "", "",
"", "", "", "";
ext_lna {
gpio-hog;
gpios = <2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
output-high;
line-name = "rut955:wmac:ext_lna";
};
mmc_cs {
gpio-hog;
gpios = <3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
output-high;
line-name = "rut955:mmc:cs";
};
ext_int {
gpio-hog;
gpios = <4 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
input;
line-name = "rut955:ext:int";
};
uart1_td {
gpio-hog;
gpios = <18 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
output-high;
line-name = "rut955:uart1:td";
};
uart1_rd {
gpio-hog;
gpios = <11 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
input;
line-name = "rut955:uart1:rd";
};
led_wan {
gpio-hog;
gpios = <1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
output-high;
line-name = "rut955:led:wan";
};
led_lan2 {
gpio-hog;
gpios = <13 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
output-high;
line-name = "rut955:led:lan2";
};
led_lan1 {
gpio-hog;
gpios = <14 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
output-high;
line-name = "rut955:led:lan1";
};
led_lan3 {
gpio-hog;
gpios = <22 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
output-high;
line-name = "rut955:led:lan3";
};
};
&i2c0 {
gpio_ext: gpio_ext@74 {
status = "okay";
compatible = "nxp,pca9539";
reg = <0x74>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
gpio-controller;
#gpio-cells = <2>;
reset-gpios = <&gpio 21 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
interrupt-parent = <&gpio>;
interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
interrupt-controller;
#interrupt-cells = <2>;
gpio-line-names = "signal_bar0", "signal_bar1", "signal_bar2", "signal_bar3",
"signal_bar4", "status_red", "status_green", "sim_sel",
"DOUT1", "DOUT2", "DIN2", "DIN1",
"MON", "MRST", "SDCD", "RS485_R";
};
};
&hs_uart {
dtr-gpios = <&gpio_ext 15 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
};
ath79: add support for Teltonika RUT955 H7V3C0 This board was previously supported in ar71xx as 'RUT9XX'. The difference between that and the other RUT955 board already supported in ath79 is that instead of the SPI shift registers driving the LEDs and digital outputs that model got an I2C GPIO expander instead. To support LEDs during early boot and interrupt-driven digital inputs, I2C support as well as support for PCA953x has to be built-in and cannot be kernel modules, hence select those symbols for ath79/generic. Specification: - 550/400/200 MHz (CPU/DDR/AHB) - 128 MB of RAM (DDR2) - 16 MB of FLASH (SPI NOR) - 4x 10/100 Mbps Ethernet, with passive PoE support on LAN1 - 2T2R 2,4 GHz (AR9344) - built-in 4G/3G module (example: Quectel EC-25EU) - internal microSD slot (spi-mmc, buggy and disabled for now) - RS232 on D-Sub9 port (Cypress ACM via USB, /dev/ttyACM0) - RS422/RS485 (AR934x high speed UART, /dev/ttyATH1) - analog 0-24V input (MCP3221) - various digital inputs and outputs incl. a relay - 11x LED (4 are driven by AR9344, 7 by PCA9539) - 2x miniSIM slot (can be swapped via GPIO) - 2x RP-SMA/F (Wi-Fi), 3x SMA/F (2x WWAN, GPS) - 1x button (reset) - DC jack for main power input (9-30 V) - debugging UART available on PCB edge connector Serial console (/dev/ttyS0) pinout: - RX: pin1 (square) on top side of the main PCB (AR9344 is on top) - TX: pin1 (square) on bottom side Flash instruction: Vendor firmware is based on OpenWrt CC release. Use the "factory" image directly in GUI (make sure to uncheck "keep settings") or in U-Boot web based recovery. To avoid any problems, make sure to first update vendor firmware to latest version - "factory" image was successfully tested on device running "RUT9XX_R_00.06.051" firmware and U-Boot "3.0.1". Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
2020-04-29 19:59:04 +00:00
&eth0 {
status = "okay";
phy-handle = <&swphy4>;
mtd-mac-address = <&config 0x0>;
mtd-mac-address-increment = <1>;
};
&eth1 {
status = "okay";
mtd-mac-address = <&config 0x0>;
};
&builtin_switch {
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&pmx_leds_switch>;
};
&wmac {
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&pmx_ext_lna>;
};
&pinmux {
pmx_ext_lna: ext_lna {
// EXT_LNA0 on GPIO 2
pinctrl-single,bits = <0x0 0x002e0000 0x00ff0000>;
};
};