ExternalVendorCode/openwrt
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt.git synced 2025-01-26 14:19:43 +00:00
Code Issues Actions 5 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
openwrt/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar9342_ubnt_powerbeam-5ac-gen2.dts

39 lines
663 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

target: update SPDX license names SPDX moved from GPL-2.0 to GPL-2.0-only and from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0-or-later. Reflect that in the SPDX license headers. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-22 20:49:55 +02:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam 5AC Gen2 The Ubiquiti PowerBeam 5AC Gen 2 (PBE-5AC-Gen2) is an outdoor 802.11ac 5 GHz bridge with a radio feed and a dish antenna. The device is hardware-compatible with the LiteBeam AC Gen2, plus the 4 extra LEDs. Specifications: - SoC: Qualcomm Atheros AR9342 rev 2 - RAM: 64 MB DDR2 - Flash: 16 MB SPI NOR (mx25l12805d) - Ethernet: 1x 10/100/1000 Mbps Atheros 8035, 24 Vdc PoE-in - WiFi 5 GHz: QCA988x HW2.0 Ubiquiti target 0x4100016c chip_id 0x043222ff - WiFi 2.4 GHz: Atheros AR9340 (SoC-based) - Buttons: 1x (reset) - LEDs: 1x power, 1x Ethernet, 4x RSSI via GPIO. All blue. - UART: not tested Installation from stock airOS firmware: - Follow instructions for WA-type Ubiquiti devices on OpenWrt wiki Signed-off-by: Roger Pueyo Centelles <roger.pueyo@guifi.net> [changed device name in commit title] Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-03-12 11:37:10 +01:00
ath79: create DTSI files for ubnt WA 1-/2-port devices The ar9342 Ubiquiti WA devices appear to only have two different network setups, based on the number of ethernet ports. Create DTSI files for them to consolidate duplicate definitions. Signed-off-by: Nick Hainke <vincent@systemli.org> [rephrase commit message/title] Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-10-25 12:58:30 +01:00
#include "ar9342_ubnt_wa_1port.dtsi"
ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam 5AC Gen2 The Ubiquiti PowerBeam 5AC Gen 2 (PBE-5AC-Gen2) is an outdoor 802.11ac 5 GHz bridge with a radio feed and a dish antenna. The device is hardware-compatible with the LiteBeam AC Gen2, plus the 4 extra LEDs. Specifications: - SoC: Qualcomm Atheros AR9342 rev 2 - RAM: 64 MB DDR2 - Flash: 16 MB SPI NOR (mx25l12805d) - Ethernet: 1x 10/100/1000 Mbps Atheros 8035, 24 Vdc PoE-in - WiFi 5 GHz: QCA988x HW2.0 Ubiquiti target 0x4100016c chip_id 0x043222ff - WiFi 2.4 GHz: Atheros AR9340 (SoC-based) - Buttons: 1x (reset) - LEDs: 1x power, 1x Ethernet, 4x RSSI via GPIO. All blue. - UART: not tested Installation from stock airOS firmware: - Follow instructions for WA-type Ubiquiti devices on OpenWrt wiki Signed-off-by: Roger Pueyo Centelles <roger.pueyo@guifi.net> [changed device name in commit title] Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-03-12 11:37:10 +01:00
/ {
compatible = "ubnt,powerbeam-5ac-gen2", "ubnt,wa", "qca,ar9342";
model = "Ubiquiti PowerBeam 5AC Gen2";
aliases {
led-boot = &led_rssi3;
led-failsafe = &led_rssi3;
led-upgrade = &led_rssi3;
};
leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
rssi0 {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 17:31:17 +02:00
label = "blue:rssi0";
ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam 5AC Gen2 The Ubiquiti PowerBeam 5AC Gen 2 (PBE-5AC-Gen2) is an outdoor 802.11ac 5 GHz bridge with a radio feed and a dish antenna. The device is hardware-compatible with the LiteBeam AC Gen2, plus the 4 extra LEDs. Specifications: - SoC: Qualcomm Atheros AR9342 rev 2 - RAM: 64 MB DDR2 - Flash: 16 MB SPI NOR (mx25l12805d) - Ethernet: 1x 10/100/1000 Mbps Atheros 8035, 24 Vdc PoE-in - WiFi 5 GHz: QCA988x HW2.0 Ubiquiti target 0x4100016c chip_id 0x043222ff - WiFi 2.4 GHz: Atheros AR9340 (SoC-based) - Buttons: 1x (reset) - LEDs: 1x power, 1x Ethernet, 4x RSSI via GPIO. All blue. - UART: not tested Installation from stock airOS firmware: - Follow instructions for WA-type Ubiquiti devices on OpenWrt wiki Signed-off-by: Roger Pueyo Centelles <roger.pueyo@guifi.net> [changed device name in commit title] Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-03-12 11:37:10 +01:00
gpios = <&gpio 11 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
rssi1 {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 17:31:17 +02:00
label = "blue:rssi1";
ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam 5AC Gen2 The Ubiquiti PowerBeam 5AC Gen 2 (PBE-5AC-Gen2) is an outdoor 802.11ac 5 GHz bridge with a radio feed and a dish antenna. The device is hardware-compatible with the LiteBeam AC Gen2, plus the 4 extra LEDs. Specifications: - SoC: Qualcomm Atheros AR9342 rev 2 - RAM: 64 MB DDR2 - Flash: 16 MB SPI NOR (mx25l12805d) - Ethernet: 1x 10/100/1000 Mbps Atheros 8035, 24 Vdc PoE-in - WiFi 5 GHz: QCA988x HW2.0 Ubiquiti target 0x4100016c chip_id 0x043222ff - WiFi 2.4 GHz: Atheros AR9340 (SoC-based) - Buttons: 1x (reset) - LEDs: 1x power, 1x Ethernet, 4x RSSI via GPIO. All blue. - UART: not tested Installation from stock airOS firmware: - Follow instructions for WA-type Ubiquiti devices on OpenWrt wiki Signed-off-by: Roger Pueyo Centelles <roger.pueyo@guifi.net> [changed device name in commit title] Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-03-12 11:37:10 +01:00
gpios = <&gpio 16 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
rssi2 {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 17:31:17 +02:00
label = "blue:rssi2";
ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam 5AC Gen2 The Ubiquiti PowerBeam 5AC Gen 2 (PBE-5AC-Gen2) is an outdoor 802.11ac 5 GHz bridge with a radio feed and a dish antenna. The device is hardware-compatible with the LiteBeam AC Gen2, plus the 4 extra LEDs. Specifications: - SoC: Qualcomm Atheros AR9342 rev 2 - RAM: 64 MB DDR2 - Flash: 16 MB SPI NOR (mx25l12805d) - Ethernet: 1x 10/100/1000 Mbps Atheros 8035, 24 Vdc PoE-in - WiFi 5 GHz: QCA988x HW2.0 Ubiquiti target 0x4100016c chip_id 0x043222ff - WiFi 2.4 GHz: Atheros AR9340 (SoC-based) - Buttons: 1x (reset) - LEDs: 1x power, 1x Ethernet, 4x RSSI via GPIO. All blue. - UART: not tested Installation from stock airOS firmware: - Follow instructions for WA-type Ubiquiti devices on OpenWrt wiki Signed-off-by: Roger Pueyo Centelles <roger.pueyo@guifi.net> [changed device name in commit title] Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-03-12 11:37:10 +01:00
gpios = <&gpio 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
led_rssi3: rssi3 {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 17:31:17 +02:00
label = "blue:rssi3";
ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam 5AC Gen2 The Ubiquiti PowerBeam 5AC Gen 2 (PBE-5AC-Gen2) is an outdoor 802.11ac 5 GHz bridge with a radio feed and a dish antenna. The device is hardware-compatible with the LiteBeam AC Gen2, plus the 4 extra LEDs. Specifications: - SoC: Qualcomm Atheros AR9342 rev 2 - RAM: 64 MB DDR2 - Flash: 16 MB SPI NOR (mx25l12805d) - Ethernet: 1x 10/100/1000 Mbps Atheros 8035, 24 Vdc PoE-in - WiFi 5 GHz: QCA988x HW2.0 Ubiquiti target 0x4100016c chip_id 0x043222ff - WiFi 2.4 GHz: Atheros AR9340 (SoC-based) - Buttons: 1x (reset) - LEDs: 1x power, 1x Ethernet, 4x RSSI via GPIO. All blue. - UART: not tested Installation from stock airOS firmware: - Follow instructions for WA-type Ubiquiti devices on OpenWrt wiki Signed-off-by: Roger Pueyo Centelles <roger.pueyo@guifi.net> [changed device name in commit title] Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-03-12 11:37:10 +01:00
gpios = <&gpio 14 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
};
};
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink