mirror of
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt.git
synced 2024-12-29 10:08:59 +00:00
208 lines
8.0 KiB
Diff
208 lines
8.0 KiB
Diff
|
From 959c59c7a0164117e7f8366466a32bb1f8d77ff1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||
|
From: Pauli <pauli@openssl.org>
|
||
|
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 15:28:20 +1100
|
||
|
Subject: [PATCH] x509: excessive resource use verifying policy constraints
|
||
|
|
||
|
A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions
|
||
|
of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains
|
||
|
that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this
|
||
|
vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers
|
||
|
exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service
|
||
|
(DoS) attack on affected systems.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Fixes CVE-2023-0464
|
||
|
|
||
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
|
||
|
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
|
||
|
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20568)
|
||
|
|
||
|
--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h
|
||
|
+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h
|
||
|
@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ struct X509_POLICY_LEVEL_st {
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
|
||
|
struct X509_POLICY_TREE_st {
|
||
|
+ /* The number of nodes in the tree */
|
||
|
+ size_t node_count;
|
||
|
+ /* The maximum number of nodes in the tree */
|
||
|
+ size_t node_maximum;
|
||
|
+
|
||
|
/* This is the tree 'level' data */
|
||
|
X509_POLICY_LEVEL *levels;
|
||
|
int nlevel;
|
||
|
@@ -157,7 +162,8 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_tree_find_
|
||
|
X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
|
||
|
X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
|
||
|
X509_POLICY_NODE *parent,
|
||
|
- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree);
|
||
|
+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
|
||
|
+ int extra_data);
|
||
|
void ossl_policy_node_free(X509_POLICY_NODE *node);
|
||
|
int ossl_policy_node_match(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lvl,
|
||
|
const X509_POLICY_NODE *node, const ASN1_OBJECT *oid);
|
||
|
--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c
|
||
|
+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c
|
||
|
@@ -59,10 +59,15 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_find
|
||
|
X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
|
||
|
X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
|
||
|
X509_POLICY_NODE *parent,
|
||
|
- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
|
||
|
+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
|
||
|
+ int extra_data)
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
X509_POLICY_NODE *node;
|
||
|
|
||
|
+ /* Verify that the tree isn't too large. This mitigates CVE-2023-0464 */
|
||
|
+ if (tree->node_maximum > 0 && tree->node_count >= tree->node_maximum)
|
||
|
+ return NULL;
|
||
|
+
|
||
|
node = OPENSSL_zalloc(sizeof(*node));
|
||
|
if (node == NULL) {
|
||
|
ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509V3, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE);
|
||
|
@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
node->data = data;
|
||
|
node->parent = parent;
|
||
|
- if (level) {
|
||
|
+ if (level != NULL) {
|
||
|
if (OBJ_obj2nid(data->valid_policy) == NID_any_policy) {
|
||
|
if (level->anyPolicy)
|
||
|
goto node_error;
|
||
|
@@ -90,7 +95,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
- if (tree) {
|
||
|
+ if (extra_data) {
|
||
|
if (tree->extra_data == NULL)
|
||
|
tree->extra_data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_new_null();
|
||
|
if (tree->extra_data == NULL){
|
||
|
@@ -103,6 +108,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
+ tree->node_count++;
|
||
|
if (parent)
|
||
|
parent->nchild++;
|
||
|
|
||
|
--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c
|
||
|
+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c
|
||
|
@@ -14,6 +14,17 @@
|
||
|
|
||
|
#include "pcy_local.h"
|
||
|
|
||
|
+/*
|
||
|
+ * If the maximum number of nodes in the policy tree isn't defined, set it to
|
||
|
+ * a generous default of 1000 nodes.
|
||
|
+ *
|
||
|
+ * Defining this to be zero means unlimited policy tree growth which opens the
|
||
|
+ * door on CVE-2023-0464.
|
||
|
+ */
|
||
|
+#ifndef OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX
|
||
|
+# define OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX 1000
|
||
|
+#endif
|
||
|
+
|
||
|
static void expected_print(BIO *channel,
|
||
|
X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lev, X509_POLICY_NODE *node,
|
||
|
int indent)
|
||
|
@@ -163,6 +174,9 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **
|
||
|
return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
+ /* Limit the growth of the tree to mitigate CVE-2023-0464 */
|
||
|
+ tree->node_maximum = OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX;
|
||
|
+
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-6.1.2, figure 3.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
@@ -180,7 +194,7 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **
|
||
|
if ((data = ossl_policy_data_new(NULL,
|
||
|
OBJ_nid2obj(NID_any_policy), 0)) == NULL)
|
||
|
goto bad_tree;
|
||
|
- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree) == NULL) {
|
||
|
+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree, 1) == NULL) {
|
||
|
ossl_policy_data_free(data);
|
||
|
goto bad_tree;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
@@ -239,7 +253,8 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **
|
||
|
* Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
|
||
|
- X509_POLICY_DATA *data)
|
||
|
+ X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
|
||
|
+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
X509_POLICY_LEVEL *last = curr - 1;
|
||
|
int i, matched = 0;
|
||
|
@@ -249,13 +264,13 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509
|
||
|
X509_POLICY_NODE *node = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_value(last->nodes, i);
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (ossl_policy_node_match(last, node, data->valid_policy)) {
|
||
|
- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, NULL) == NULL)
|
||
|
+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 0) == NULL)
|
||
|
return 0;
|
||
|
matched = 1;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
if (!matched && last->anyPolicy) {
|
||
|
- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL)
|
||
|
+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL)
|
||
|
return 0;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
return 1;
|
||
|
@@ -268,7 +283,8 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509
|
||
|
* Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
|
||
|
- const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache)
|
||
|
+ const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache,
|
||
|
+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
int i;
|
||
|
|
||
|
@@ -276,7 +292,7 @@ static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_L
|
||
|
X509_POLICY_DATA *data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_value(cache->data, i);
|
||
|
|
||
|
/* Look for matching nodes in previous level */
|
||
|
- if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data))
|
||
|
+ if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data, tree))
|
||
|
return 0;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
return 1;
|
||
|
@@ -307,7 +323,7 @@ static int tree_add_unmatched(X509_POLIC
|
||
|
/* Curr may not have anyPolicy */
|
||
|
data->qualifier_set = cache->anyPolicy->qualifier_set;
|
||
|
data->flags |= POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS;
|
||
|
- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree) == NULL) {
|
||
|
+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 1) == NULL) {
|
||
|
ossl_policy_data_free(data);
|
||
|
return 0;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
@@ -370,7 +386,7 @@ static int tree_link_any(X509_POLICY_LEV
|
||
|
/* Finally add link to anyPolicy */
|
||
|
if (last->anyPolicy &&
|
||
|
ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy,
|
||
|
- last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL)
|
||
|
+ last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL)
|
||
|
return 0;
|
||
|
return 1;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
@@ -553,7 +569,7 @@ static int tree_calculate_user_set(X509_
|
||
|
extra->flags = POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS
|
||
|
| POLICY_DATA_FLAG_EXTRA_NODE;
|
||
|
node = ossl_policy_level_add_node(NULL, extra, anyPolicy->parent,
|
||
|
- tree);
|
||
|
+ tree, 1);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
if (!tree->user_policies) {
|
||
|
tree->user_policies = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_new_null();
|
||
|
@@ -580,7 +596,7 @@ static int tree_evaluate(X509_POLICY_TRE
|
||
|
|
||
|
for (i = 1; i < tree->nlevel; i++, curr++) {
|
||
|
cache = ossl_policy_cache_set(curr->cert);
|
||
|
- if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache))
|
||
|
+ if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache, tree))
|
||
|
return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL;
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (!(curr->flags & X509_V_FLAG_INHIBIT_ANY)
|