openwrt/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar9344_netgear_wndr.dtsi

264 lines
4.2 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR MIT
#include "ar9344.dtsi"
#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
/ {
chosen {
bootargs = "console=ttyS0,115200n8";
};
aliases {
led-boot = &led_power_amber;
led-failsafe = &led_power_amber;
led-running = &led_power_green;
led-upgrade = &led_power_amber;
label-mac-device = &eth0;
};
keys {
compatible = "gpio-keys";
wps {
label = "wps";
linux,code = <KEY_WPS_BUTTON>;
gpios = <&gpio 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
reset {
label = "reset";
linux,code = <KEY_RESTART>;
gpios = <&gpio 21 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
rfkill {
label = "rfkill";
linux,code = <KEY_RFKILL>;
gpios = <&gpio 15 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
};
ath79/nand: add support for Netgear WNDR4300TN This patch adds support for the WNDR4300TN, marketed by Belgian ISP Telenet. The hardware is the same as the WNDR4300 v1, without the fifth ethernet port (WAN) and the USB port. The circuit board has the traces, but the components are missing. Specifications: * SoC: Atheros AR9344 * RAM: 128 MB * Flash: 128 MB NAND flash * WiFi: Atheros AR9580 (5 GHz) and AR9344 (2.4 GHz) * Ethernet: 4x 1000Base-T * LED: Power, LAN, WiFi 2.4GHz, WiFi 5GHz, WPS * UART: on board, to the right of the RF shield at the top of the board Installation: * Flashing through the OEM web interface: + Connect your computer to the router with an ethernet cable and browse to http://192.168.0.51/ + Log in with the default credentials are admin:password + Browse to Advanced > Administration > Firmware Upgrade in the Telenet interface + Upload the Openwrt firmware: openwrt-ath79-nand-netgear_wndr4300tn-squashfs-factory.img + Proceed with the firmware installation and give the device a few minutes to finish and reboot. * Flashing through TFTP: + Configure your wired client with a static IP in the 192.168.1.x range, e.g. 192.168.1.10 and netmask 255.255.255.0. + Power off the router. + Press and hold the RESET button (the factory reset button on the bottom of the device, with the gray circle around it, next to the Telenet logo) and turn the router on while keeping the button pressed. + The power LED will start flashing orange. You can release the button once it switches to flashing green. + Transfer the image over TFTP: $ tftp 192.168.1.1 -m binary -c put openwrt-ath79-nand-netgear_wndr4300tn-squashfs-factory.img Signed-off-by: Davy Hollevoet <github@natox.be> [use DT label reference for adding LEDs in DTSI files] Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-06-22 12:45:14 +00:00
leds: leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&enable_gpio_11>;
led_power_green: power_green {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "green:power";
gpios = <&gpio 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
led_power_amber: power_amber {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "amber:power";
gpios = <&gpio 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
default-state = "keep";
};
wlan2g_green {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "green:wlan2g";
gpios = <&gpio 11 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
linux,default-trigger = "phy0tpt";
};
wlan5g_blue {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "blue:wlan5g";
gpios = <&gpio 14 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
linux,default-trigger = "phy1tpt";
};
wps_green {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "green:wps";
gpios = <&gpio 16 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
wps_amber {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "amber:wps";
gpios = <&gpio 17 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
};
ubi-concat {
compatible = "mtd-concat";
devices = <&ubipart0 &ubipart1>;
partitions {
compatible = "fixed-partitions";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
ubi@ac0000 {
label = "ubi";
reg = <0x0 0x7500000>;
};
};
};
};
&pinmux {
enable_gpio_11: pinmux_enable_gpio_11 {
pinctrl-single,bits = <0x8 0x0 0xff000000>;
};
};
&nand {
status = "okay";
partitions {
compatible = "fixed-partitions";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
partition@0 {
label = "u-boot";
reg = <0x0 0x40000>;
read-only;
};
partition@40000 {
label = "u-boot-env";
reg = <0x40000 0x40000>;
};
caldata: partition@80000 {
label = "caldata";
reg = <0x80000 0x40000>;
read-only;
};
partition@c0000 {
label = "pot";
reg = <0xc0000 0x80000>;
};
partition@140000 {
label = "language";
reg = <0x140000 0x200000>;
};
partition@340000 {
label = "config";
reg = <0x340000 0x80000>;
};
partition@3c0000 {
label = "traffic_meter";
reg = <0x3c0000 0x300000>;
};
kernel@6c0000 {
label = "kernel";
reg = <0x6c0000 0x400000>;
};
ubipart0: partition@ac0000 {
label = "ubipart0";
reg = <0xac0000 0x1500000>;
};
partition@6c0000 {
label = "firmware";
reg = <0x6c0000 0x1900000>;
compatible = "netgear,uimage";
};
partition@1fc0000 {
label = "caldata_backup";
reg = <0x1fc0000 0x40000>;
read-only;
};
ubipart1: partition@2000000 {
label = "ubipart1";
reg = <0x2000000 0x6000000>;
};
};
};
&ref {
clock-frequency = <40000000>;
};
&builtin_switch {
resets = <&rst 8>, <&rst 12>;
reset-names = "switch", "switch-analog";
};
&mdio0 {
status = "okay";
phy-mask = <0>;
phy0: ethernet-phy@0 {
reg = <0>;
phy-mode = "rgmii";
qca,mib-poll-interval = <500>;
qca,ar8327-initvals = <
0x04 0x07600000
0x0c 0x01000000
0x10 0xc1000000
0x50 0xcc35cc35
0x54 0xcb37cb37
0x58 0x00000000
0x5c 0x00f3cf00
0x7c 0x0000007e
0x94 0x0000007e
>;
};
};
&eth0 {
status = "okay";
/* default for ar934x, except for 1000M */
pll-data = <0x06000000 0x00000101 0x00001616>;
mtd-mac-address = <&caldata 0x0>;
phy-mode = "rgmii";
phy-handle = <&phy0>;
};
&gpio {
lna0 {
gpio-hog;
line-name = "netgear:ext:lna0";
gpios = <18 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
output-high;
};
lna1 {
gpio-hog;
line-name = "netgear:ext:lna1";
gpios = <19 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
output-high;
};
};
&wmac {
status = "okay";
mtd-mac-address = <&caldata 0x0>;
qca,no-eeprom;
};
&pcie {
status = "okay";
ath9k: wifi@0,0 {
compatible = "pci168c,0033";
reg = <0x0000 0 0 0 0>;
mtd-mac-address = <&caldata 0xc>;
qca,no-eeprom;
#gpio-cells = <2>;
gpio-controller;
};
};
&uart {
status = "okay";
};