2019-11-09 16:06:05 +00:00
|
|
|
ath10k-ct starting with version 5.2 allows the combination of
|
|
|
|
|
NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC and beacon_int_min_gcd in ath10k_10x_ct_if_comb
|
|
|
|
|
which triggers this warning. Ben told me that this is not a big problem
|
|
|
|
|
and we should ignore this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--- a/net/wireless/core.c
|
|
|
|
|
+++ b/net/wireless/core.c
|
2022-01-28 13:32:21 +00:00
|
|
|
@@ -634,21 +634,6 @@ static int wiphy_verify_combinations(str
|
2019-11-09 16:06:05 +00:00
|
|
|
c->limits[j].max > 1))
|
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- /*
|
|
|
|
|
- * This isn't well-defined right now. If you have an
|
|
|
|
|
- * IBSS interface, then its beacon interval may change
|
|
|
|
|
- * by joining other networks, and nothing prevents it
|
|
|
|
|
- * from doing that.
|
|
|
|
|
- * So technically we probably shouldn't even allow AP
|
|
|
|
|
- * and IBSS in the same interface, but it seems that
|
|
|
|
|
- * some drivers support that, possibly only with fixed
|
|
|
|
|
- * beacon intervals for IBSS.
|
|
|
|
|
- */
|
|
|
|
|
- if (WARN_ON(types & BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC) &&
|
|
|
|
|
- c->beacon_int_min_gcd)) {
|
|
|
|
|
- return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
cnt += c->limits[j].max;
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* Don't advertise an unsupported type
|
