mirror of
https://github.com/nasa/openmct.git
synced 2025-06-16 06:08:11 +00:00
Typo corrections, I avoided making changes to words that have regional spelling differences.
This commit is contained in:
@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ Worked on bug fixes in the platform and a plugin for search.
|
||||
It is hard to figure out what the difference between the various ways of
|
||||
dealing with telemetry are. e.g., what is the difference between just
|
||||
"Telemetry" and the "Telemetry Service"? There are many
|
||||
"Telemetry Thing"s which seem related, but in an unclear way.
|
||||
"Telemetry Things" which seem related, but in an unclear way.
|
||||
|
||||
### Developer Intern 2
|
||||
|
||||
@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ Instead, propose that:
|
||||
For parity with actions, a `View` would be a constructor which
|
||||
takes an `ActionContext` as a parameter (with similarly-defined
|
||||
properties) and exposes a method to retrieve the HTML elements
|
||||
associateed with it.
|
||||
associated with it.
|
||||
|
||||
The platform would then additionally expose an `AngularView`
|
||||
implementation to improve compatibility with existing
|
||||
|
@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ To reduce interface depth, we can replace our own provider and registry patterns
|
||||
|
||||
## More angular: for all services
|
||||
|
||||
Increasing our commitment to angular would mean using more of the angular factorys, services, etc, and less of our home grown tools. We'd implement our services and extension points as angular providers, and make them configurable via app.config.
|
||||
Increasing our commitment to angular would mean using more of the angular factories, services, etc, and less of our home grown tools. We'd implement our services and extension points as angular providers, and make them configurable via app.config.
|
||||
|
||||
As an example, registering a specific type of model provider in angular would look like:
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user