mirror of
https://github.com/nasa/openmct.git
synced 2024-12-20 05:37:53 +00:00
[Documentation] Add process documentation
Bring over process documentation (except for calendar), nasa/openmctweb#223.
This commit is contained in:
parent
7264a711a3
commit
c5736cafb1
@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
|
||||
<li><a href="architecture/">Architecture Overview</a></li>
|
||||
<li><a href="guide/">Developer Guide</a></li>
|
||||
<li><a href="tutorials/">Tutorials</a></li>
|
||||
<li><a href="process/">Development Process</a></li>
|
||||
</ul>
|
||||
</body>
|
||||
</html>
|
||||
|
107
docs/src/process/index.md
Normal file
107
docs/src/process/index.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
|
||||
# Development Cycle
|
||||
|
||||
Development of Open MCT Web occurs on an iterative cycle of
|
||||
sprints and releases.
|
||||
|
||||
* A _sprint_ is three weeks in duration, and represents a
|
||||
set of improvements that can be completed and tested by the
|
||||
development team. Software at the end of the sprint is
|
||||
"semi-stable"; it will have undergone reduced testing and may carry
|
||||
defects or usability issues of lower severity, particularly if
|
||||
there are workarounds.
|
||||
* A _release_ occurs every four sprints. Releases are stable, and
|
||||
will have undergone full acceptance testing to ensure that the
|
||||
software behaves correctly and usably.
|
||||
|
||||
## Roles
|
||||
|
||||
The sprint process assumes the presence of a __project manager.__
|
||||
The project manager is responsible for
|
||||
making tactical decisions about what development work will be
|
||||
performed, and for coordinating with stakeholders to arrive at
|
||||
higher-level strategic decisions about desired functionality
|
||||
and characteristics of the software, major external milestones,
|
||||
and so forth.
|
||||
|
||||
In the absence of a dedicated project manager, this role may be rotated
|
||||
among members of the development team on a per-sprint basis.
|
||||
|
||||
Responsibilities of the project manager including:
|
||||
|
||||
* Maintaining (with agreement of stakeholders) a "road map" of work
|
||||
planned for future releases/sprints; this should be higher-level,
|
||||
usually expressed as "themes",
|
||||
with just enough specificity to gauge feasibility of plans,
|
||||
relate work back to milestones, and identify longer-term
|
||||
dependencies.
|
||||
* Determining (with assistance from the rest of the team) which
|
||||
issues to work on in a given sprint and how they shall be
|
||||
assigned.
|
||||
* Pre-planning subsequent sprints to ensure that all members of the
|
||||
team always have a clear direction.
|
||||
* Scheduling and/or ensuring adherance to
|
||||
[process points](#process-points).
|
||||
* Responding to changes within the sprint (shifting priorities,
|
||||
new issues) and re-allocating work for the sprint as needed.
|
||||
|
||||
## Sprint Calendar
|
||||
|
||||
## Process Points
|
||||
|
||||
* __Sprint plan.__ Project manager allocates issues based on
|
||||
theme(s) for sprint, then reviews with team. Each team member
|
||||
should have roughly two weeks of work allocated (to allow time
|
||||
in the third week for testing of work completed.)
|
||||
* Project manager should also sketch out subsequent sprint so
|
||||
that team may begin work for that sprint during the
|
||||
third week, since testing and blocker resolution is unlikely
|
||||
to require all available resources.
|
||||
* __Tag-up.__ Check in and status update among development team.
|
||||
May amend plan for sprint as-needed.
|
||||
* __Code freeze.__ Any new work from this sprint
|
||||
(features, bug fixes, enhancements) must be integrated by the
|
||||
end of the second week of the sprint. After code freeze
|
||||
(and until the end of the sprint) the only changes that should be
|
||||
merged into the master branch should directly address issues
|
||||
needed to pass acceptance testing.
|
||||
* __Acceptance Testing.__ Structured testing with predefined
|
||||
success criteria. No release should ship without passing
|
||||
acceptance tests. Time is allocated in each sprint for subsequent
|
||||
rounds of acceptance testing if issues are identified during a
|
||||
prior round. Specific details of acceptance testing need to be
|
||||
agreed-upon with relevant stakeholders and delivery recipients,
|
||||
and should be flexible enough to allow changes to plans
|
||||
(e.g. deferring delivery of some feature in order to ensure
|
||||
stability of other features.) Baseline testing includes:
|
||||
* __Testathon.__ Multi-user testing, involving as many users as
|
||||
is feasible, plus development team. Open-ended; should verify
|
||||
completed work from this sprint, test exploratorily for
|
||||
regressions, et cetera.
|
||||
* __24-Hour Test.__ A test to verify that the software remains
|
||||
stable after running for longer durations. May include some
|
||||
combination of automated testing and user verification (e.g.
|
||||
checking to verify that software remains subjectively
|
||||
responsive at conclusion of test.)
|
||||
* __Automated Testing.__ Automated testing integrated into the
|
||||
build. (These tests are verified to pass more often than once
|
||||
per sprint, as they run before any merge to master, but still
|
||||
play an important role in acceptance testing.)
|
||||
* __Sprint Acceptance Testing.__ Subset of Acceptance Testing
|
||||
which should be performed before shipping at the end of any
|
||||
sprint. Time is allocated for a second round of
|
||||
Sprint Acceptance Testing if the first round is not passed.
|
||||
* __Triage.__ Team reviews issues from acceptance testing and uses
|
||||
success criteria to determine whether or not they should block
|
||||
release, then formulates a plan to address these issues before
|
||||
the next round of acceptance testing. Focus here should be on
|
||||
ensuring software passes that testing in order to ship on time;
|
||||
may prefer to disable malfunctioning components and fix them
|
||||
in a subsequent sprint, for example.
|
||||
* __Ship.__ Tag a code snapshot that has passed acceptance
|
||||
testing and deploy that version. (Only true if acceptance
|
||||
testing has passed by this point; if acceptance testing has not
|
||||
been passed, will need to make ad hoc decisions with stakeholders,
|
||||
e.g. “extend the sprint” or “defer shipment until end of next
|
||||
sprint.”)
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user