Expose the Azure storage table's "Timestamp" for the models where Timestamp should be user-accessible and remove the Timestamp field from models that did not sign up for it.
The behavior where Timestamp is only set by Azure Storage is kept.
In practice, Application Insights can take up to 3 minutes before something sent to it is available via KQL.
This PR logs a start and stop marker such that the integration tests only search for logs during the integration tests. This reduces the complexity when using the integration tests during the development process.
Note: this migrated the new functionality from #356 into the latest integration test tools.
## Summary of the Pull Request
_What is this about?_
## PR Checklist
* [x] Applies to work item: #562
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/onefuzz) and sign the CLI.
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated
* [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
## Info on Pull Request
The end-to-end changes needed to have onefuzz deployed with multi-tenant authentication.
## Validation Steps Performed
_How does someone test & validate?_
## Summary of the Pull Request
_What is this about?_
Due to our GDPR privacy requirements, we decided that it would be best to completely purge personal identifiable information from our AppInsights telemetry and logging. Instead of just removing all of the logging statements with personal info, I created a filter function that logs telemetry after it's been run through a recursive scrubbing function. This PR includes this new scrubbing function.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Applies to work item: #660
* [ ] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/onefuzz) and sign the CLI.
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated
* [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
## Info on Pull Request
_What does this include?_
Includes changes to events.py in onefuzzlib. I've implemented functionality - log_event() - to recursively check Event structures for UserInfo before logging to AppInsights.
## Validation Steps Performed
I run local tests using a script I created with test events.
_How does someone test & validate?_
I can provide local testing script. If that is insufficient, I can write a unit test that will run against this code.
If a user manually deletes a scaleset managed by OneFuzz, then `get_vmss_size` returns None.
When this happens, `Scaleset.shutdown` generates an exception from the `logging.info` call on line 573.
This PR handles this edge condition.
When users try to create a container immediately after deleting it, Azure will fail saying the deletion is in-progress.
catching ResourceExistsError during create handles this error.
As is, when multiple tasks are running on a single node, if any one of them stops, the node gets reimaged.
This changes the behavior such that when a node with multiple tasks has one task stop, the other tasks will continue.
