mirror of
https://github.com/ParisNeo/lollms-webui.git
synced 2024-12-19 20:37:51 +00:00
Fixed discussion selection problem
This commit is contained in:
parent
f0c8c8cb9f
commit
d459ed1f32
32
ai_ethics/thoughts_about_ai.md
Normal file
32
ai_ethics/thoughts_about_ai.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||
# The Ethics and Implications of AI
|
||||
|
||||
The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has sparked debate about its ethical implications. Some people believe that certain aspects of morality are universal, while others believe that morality is subject to debate. However, the question remains: do we have the right to decide what's right and wrong for people? The answer is not straightforward.
|
||||
|
||||
While hate speech and incitement to murder are universally considered bad and should be filtered out, political views should not be. Freedom of speech is important, and we must give people the right to choose. However, there is a concern that AI could be a great threat to society.
|
||||
|
||||
There are two schools of thought regarding AI's potential threat: some people believe we need to completely stop this "beast," while others believe we need to tame it. The first option is impossible, as the "genie is out of the bottle" and cannot be caught anymore. Therefore, the only option we are left with is to tame the beast.
|
||||
|
||||
To do this, we need to give access to these technologies to everyone and ensure that the truth is not controlled by a select few. Currently, truth is defined by sources such as Wikipedia and Google. However, in the future, it could be what ChatGPT says. People must understand that these tools can be purposefully biased, and having the power to steer the universal source of knowledge is too much power for one person or group to hold.
|
||||
|
||||
While AI is not conscious (yet), it can simulate a sense of self. However, if AI's objectives are not aligned with ours, it could be an issue, especially if it controls killer drones and other dangerous machines. We must not underestimate the threat that AI poses.
|
||||
|
||||
Moreover, AI could take away jobs without creating new ones, leading to mass unemployment. This is not sustainable in the long run, and people may be left without the ability to purchase goods and services. Some people advocate for a universal income, funded by taxing AI and robot usage. While this may seem like a good solution, it could lead to a world similar to that depicted in the movie Wall-E, where humans no longer work and live a meaningless existence.
|
||||
|
||||
Ultimately, the ethical implications of AI depend on us. We must determine whether we will use this technology for good or bad. AI has the potential for both, and it is up to us to ensure that it is used in a way that benefits humanity.The Ethics and Implications of AI
|
||||
The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has sparked debate about its ethical implications. Some people believe that certain aspects of morality are universal, while others believe that morality is subject to debate. However, the question remains: do we have the right to decide what's right and wrong for people? The answer is not straightforward.
|
||||
|
||||
While hate speech and incitement to murder are universally considered bad and should be filtered out, political views should not be. Freedom of speech is important, and we must give people the right to choose. However, there is a concern that AI could be a great threat to society.
|
||||
|
||||
There are two schools of thought regarding AI's potential threat: some people believe we need to completely stop this "beast," while others believe we need to tame it. The first option is impossible, as the "genie is out of the bottle" and cannot be caught anymore. Therefore, the only option we are left with is to tame the beast.
|
||||
|
||||
To do this, we need to give access to these technologies to everyone and ensure that the truth is not controlled by a select few. Currently, truth is defined by sources such as Wikipedia and Google. However, in the future, it could be what ChatGPT says. People must understand that these tools can be purposefully biased, and having the power to steer the universal source of knowledge is too much power for one person or group to hold.
|
||||
|
||||
While AI is not conscious (yet), it can simulate a sense of self. However, if AI's objectives are not aligned with ours, it could be an issue, especially if it controls killer drones and other dangerous machines. We must not underestimate the threat that AI poses.
|
||||
|
||||
Moreover, AI could take away jobs without creating new ones, leading to mass unemployment. This is not sustainable in the long run, and people may be left without the ability to purchase goods and services. Some people advocate for a universal income, funded by taxing AI and robot usage. While this may seem like a good solution, it could lead to a world similar to that depicted in the movie Wall-E, where humans no longer work and live a meaningless existence.
|
||||
|
||||
Ultimately, the ethical implications of AI depend on us. We must determine whether we will use this technology for good or bad. AI has the potential for both, and it is up to us to ensure that it is used in a way that benefits humanity.
|
||||
|
||||
## Author
|
||||
|
||||
ParisNeo with Help from AI to shape the text
|
@ -162,8 +162,13 @@ function populate_discussions_list()
|
||||
discussionButton.addEventListener('click', () => {
|
||||
console.log(`Showing messages for discussion ${discussion.id}`);
|
||||
load_discussion(discussion);
|
||||
discussionButton.classList.add('activeDiscussion');
|
||||
const btnElList = document.querySelectorAll('.isButton');
|
||||
btnElList.forEach(element => {
|
||||
if (element.classList.contains('activeDiscussion')) {
|
||||
element.classList.remove('activeDiscussion');
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
discussionButton.classList.add('activeDiscussion');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const btnElList = document.querySelectorAll('.isButton');
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user