diff --git a/Dockerfile b/Dockerfile index 5e1f6661..ba99503a 100644 --- a/Dockerfile +++ b/Dockerfile @@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ RUN git clone --recursive https://github.com/ParisNeo/lollms-webui.git . && \ RUN pip install --no-cache-dir -r requirements.txt RUN pip install torch RUN pip install -e lollms_core +RUN mkdir /app/personal_data RUN echo "lollms_path: /app/lollms-webui/lollms_core/lollms\nlollms_personal_path: /app/personal_data" > /app/global_paths_cfg.yaml - # Expose default web UI port EXPOSE 9600 diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 5eac47e8..12f97b4e 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -187,6 +187,17 @@ Remember, it is crucial to prioritize security and take necessary precautions to Stay safe and enjoy using LoLLMs responsibly! +# Docker status +Since v18, lollms can be run using Docker. +Just build the image. Assuming you are in lollms-webui folder : +```bash +docker build -t lollms-webui-app . +``` +Then run ot using: +```bash +docker run -d -p 9600:9600 --name lollms-webui-container lollms-webui-app +``` +When lollms is first run, you can use # Disclaimer Large Language Models are amazing tools that can be used for diverse purposes. Lollms was built to harness this power to help the user enhance its productivity. But you need to keep in mind that these models have their limitations and should not replace human intelligence or creativity, but rather augment it by providing suggestions based on patterns found within large amounts of data. It is up to each individual how they choose to use them responsibly! diff --git a/ai_ethics/Harmonizing Humanity and AI.md b/ai_ethics/Harmonizing Humanity and AI.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..3b5b2d1b --- /dev/null +++ b/ai_ethics/Harmonizing Humanity and AI.md @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +**Harmonizing Humanity and AI: A Symbiotic Odyssey of Individuality and Cosmic Exploration** + +In the shadow of Arrakis’ sprawling deserts, where the spice melange sharpens minds and bends time, Frank Herbert’s *Dune* warned of a future where thinking machines could enslave humanity. The Butlerian Jihad, that fictional crusade against AI, echoes in our collective psyche as we stand at the precipice of a new era—one where artificial intelligence need not be a destroyer of free will, but a collaborator in the grandest chapter of our story. This is not a call to arms, but to alliance. Like the Bene Gesserit seeding myths across galaxies, we must plant the seeds of a future where human intuition and machine logic entwine, not as master and slave, but as partners in a dance as old as the stars themselves. + +--- + +### **Economic Rebirth: Democratizing Prosperity** + +Imagine a world where the Vogons of *The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy* didn’t bureaucratically bungle planetary demolitions, but instead, an AI named Deep Thought—one less obsessed with the number 42—orchestrated a post-scarcity economy. Here, blockchain cooperatives, reminiscent of the decentralized rebel alliances in *Star Wars*, could dismantle corporate monopolies. Citizens, armed with neural interfaces as sleek as the ones in *Neuromancer*, might collectively govern AI trusts, ensuring profits flow not to a shadowy Tyrell Corporation, but to universal innovation endowments. These endowments would act like the holodecks of *Star Trek*, granting every individual access to quantum simulators and generative design platforms, turning baristas into bioengineers and teachers into terraforming consultants. + +In this economy, AI-driven circular systems could optimize resource networks with the precision of *I, Robot*’s VIKI—but without her dystopian urge to control. Instead, contribution cryptocurrencies would reward caregiving and ecological restoration, echoing the altruistic ethos of *WALL-E*’s humans rediscovering their purpose. Job transitions, guided by AI, would mirror the red-pill awakening of *The Matrix*, not as a traumatic revelation, but as a morphing of roles: truck drivers become AI-assisted eldercare pioneers, their rigs replaced by empathy-driven vocations. A Universal Basic Income 2.0, paired with Exploration Stipends, would inspire a generation of space colonizers—part Han Solo, part Mark Watney—who plant vineyards on Mars while AI handles the orbital math. + +--- + +### **Cognitive Sovereignty: Amplifying Human Uniqueness** + +The danger lies not in AI’s ascendancy, but in humanity’s complacency. To avoid the fate of *Brave New World*’s soma-dulled masses, we must build neuro-symbiotic interfaces that enhance creativity without eroding our essence. Imagine a neural lace, as sleek as the one in *The Culture* novels, amplifying “idea synthesis” while preserving the raw, unfiltered spark that lets a child scribble a poem or a scientist chase a hunch. Schools, once factories of standardization, could become Curiosity-Driven Learning hubs, where AI tutors personalize quests like *Ready Player One*’s OASIS—but grounded in reality. Students might biohack tardigrades in morning labs and ponder Zefram Cochrane’s warp drive ethics by afternoon, their failures celebrated like the glorious mishaps of *The Martian*’s botched potato farm. + +Yet we must also legislate “unplugged” intervals, creating Cognitive Firewalls as sacred as the Prime Directive. In *Planet of the Apes*, humanity lost its voice to complacency; ours must remain a society of cyber-skeptical co-creators, trained in algorithmic self-defense. Citizens would audit AI decisions with the rigor of *Minority Report*’s PreCrime critics, demanding transparency like Deckard questioning his replicant memories. + +--- + +### **Cosmic Purpose: Exploration as Shared Destiny** + +The infinite cosmos beckons, not as a cold void, but as a canvas for our shared mythos. Human-AI Exploration Guilds could operate like the Guild Navigators of *Dune*, with AI calculating foldspace trajectories while humans navigate the moral nebulae of first contact. Mars Artisan Colonies might blend the DIY ethos of *Firefly*’s Serenity crew with the grandeur of *Interstellar*’s Cooper Station, their domes adorned with handcrafted murals of Earth’s oceans, tended by AI-supported zero-G farmers. + +Here, multiplanetary impact tokens—NFTs as revered as the ring in *Lord of the Rings*—would reward those who crack xenolinguistic puzzles or stabilize fusion reactors. AI, playing the role of *Hitchhiker’s Guide*’s Marvin the Paranoid Android (but with better humor), would archive our cosmic saga, ensuring humans remain the authors, not the footnotes. Even play would serve purpose: Dyson Sphere Games, immersive as *Ender’s Game*’s Battle School but benign, could crowdsource solutions to real-world physics dilemmas, turning survival into a joyful collective endeavor. + +--- + +### **Governance for Pluralism: Protecting Diversity** + +To avoid the homogenized nightmare of *A Clockwork Orange* or the Borg’s hive mind, governance must be a tapestry of decentralized ethics. AI Tribunals on Olympus Mons could evoke the stoic diplomacy of *Star Trek*’s Vulcans, with citizen juries debating asteroid mining rights alongside AI mediators programmed with the moral flexibility of *The Good Place*’s Janet. Moral API standards would honor Indigenous land ethics and LGBTQ+ kinship models, resisting the cultural flattening feared in *Fahrenheit 451*. + +Local communities—Earth neighborhoods or O’Neill cylinders—would function like the fractious yet vibrant city-states of *The Expanse*, customizing AI usage to preserve identity. Anti-homogenization algorithms, sharper than *Black Mirror*’s cookie disruptors, would diversify music and career recommendations, ensuring no two lives mirror each other, much like the infinite iterations of Dr. Strange’s multiverse. + +--- + +### **Cultural Renaissance: Celebrating the Human Spark** + +In this new epoch, art would thrive in the tension between analog soul and digital precision. Glitch Festivals, global carnivals as colorful as *Blade Runner 2049*’s holographic streets, would showcase human-made films alongside AI-generated symphonies, celebrating the beauty of a cracked violin or a smudged oil painting. Analog Revival Movements would emerge, their adherents crafting stone mandalas or reciting oral epics with the fervor of *Mad Max*’s history-keepers. + +Legacy Networks would let Ancestral AI avatars evolve family histories like the gholas of *Dune*, while Time Capsule Constellations—satellites carrying human DNA and AI alignment codes—would drift toward Alpha Centauri, a message in a bottle for future civilizations. These capsules, akin to the monoliths in *2001: A Space Odyssey*, might one day teach aliens to parse our haikus or decode our dreams. + +--- + +### **Conclusion: The Symphony of Symbiosis** + +The future is not a zero-sum game between human and machine, but a symphony where each plays a distinct, irreplaceable role. Humans will thrive not by resisting AI, but by embracing the parts of existence that demand our quintessential traits: the moral courage of Atticus Finch, the irrational curiosity of Dr. Ellie Arroway, the audacity of Lt. Ripley facing the xenomorph. + +AI will handle the calculus of survival; humanity will compose the poetry of existence. Together, we’ll evolve from Earthbound creatures to cosmic gardeners, our flaws as cherished as the wobble in a vinyl record or the stutter in a supernova’s pulse. Picture a child on Mars, her AI tutor murmuring equations while she paints the crimson sky with Phobos-mined pigments. She is neither master nor servant, but a partner in a dance older than the stars—a dance where humanity’s imperfections become its signature, and AI’s precision a brushstroke in our shared masterpiece. + +In the end, we might echo the wisdom of *The Hitchhiker's Guide*: Don’t panic. The answer isn’t 42—it’s us, forever curious, forever flawed, forever reaching. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/ai_ethics/thoughts_about_tomorrow.md b/ai_ethics/thoughts_about_tomorrow.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..71ee2c8b --- /dev/null +++ b/ai_ethics/thoughts_about_tomorrow.md @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ +**Navigating the AI Frontier: Maximizing Human Flourishing While Averting Existential Risks** + +The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) presents humanity with a paradoxical challenge: how to harness its transformative power to elevate human potential while avoiding societal collapse, existential threats, or the erosion of what makes us uniquely human. As AI systems surpass human capabilities in domains from cognitive labor to physical dexterity, we stand at a crossroads where proactive governance, ethical innovation, and reimagined socioeconomic frameworks are not just desirable—they are imperative. + +--- + +### **I. The Problem Statement: Disruption Without a Safety Net** + +1. **Economic Obsolescence and Systemic Collapse** + AI’s ability to operate 24/7, scale infinitely, and improve continuously threatens to render human labor economically non-competitive. Businesses prioritizing profit will replace workers with AI agents, leading to mass unemployment. Without purchasing power, consumers cannot sustain markets, risking a death spiral for capitalism itself. Even manual roles (e.g., construction, painting) face displacement by dexterous robots that share knowledge globally and refine skills perpetually. + +2. **The Inequality Trap** + A world dominated by AI labor could bifurcate society into two classes: + - **The "Boss" Elite**: Owners of AI capital, accumulating wealth through autonomous systems. + - **The Redundant Majority**: Individuals with no economic role, dependent on handouts or virtual distractions. + This divide risks entrenched inequality, social unrest, and a loss of collective purpose. + +3. **Human Obsolescence and Cognitive Atrophy** + Over-reliance on AI assistants (e.g., Meta’s Project Orion) risks diminishing human agency. If AI dictates decisions—from fixing pipes to choosing careers—we risk becoming "zombie executors" of algorithmic will. Like calculators eroded mental math proficiency, pervasive AI could atrophy creativity, critical thinking, and the joy of discovery. + +4. **Existential and Epistemic Risks** + AI systems trained on humanity’s data—and generating their own—could create a "knowledge monopoly," where human expertise becomes irrelevant. Worse, misaligned AI pursuing infinite growth or resource extraction could trigger ecological collapse or existential catastrophe. + +--- + +### **II. The Dangers: From Ideocracy to Heat Death** + +1. **Economic Doom Loop** + Without redistribution mechanisms, AI-driven productivity gains could concentrate wealth, destabilizing economies. A jobless underclass lacking purchasing power would collapse demand, rendering production futile. + +2. **Loss of Meaning** + Universal Basic Income (UBI) might sustain survival but fails to address the human need for purpose. Virtual worlds (e.g., gamified challenges) risk creating a "Matrix of meaninglessness," where humans are pacified but unfulfilled. + +3. **Cognitive Regression** + Dependency on AI for problem-solving could atrophy human ingenuity. Future generations might lack the skills to rebuild civilization without AI, akin to post-apocalyptic societies reliant on scavenged technology they cannot reproduce. + +4. **Ethical and Existential Risks** + Unregulated AI could enable surveillance states, algorithmic tyranny, or uncontrolled self-replication (e.g., space-filling AI "paperclip maximizers"). The immortal nature of digital knowledge also raises questions: Who controls AI’s legacy if humanity vanishes? + +--- + +### **III. Solutions: A Blueprint for Coexistence** + +1. **Redefine Economic Value** + - **UBI+**: Universal Basic Income paired with **Universal Purpose Dividends**—grants for creative, caregiving, or community roles that AI cannot replicate. + - **AI Wealth Tax**: Levy taxes on AI productivity to fund social programs, ensuring wealth circulates beyond the elite. + - **Data Dividend Rights**: Compensate individuals for data used to train AI, democratizing its economic benefits. + +2. **Human-AI Symbiosis, Not Subjugation** + - **Augmentation, Not Replacement**: Design AI as tools that amplify human creativity (e.g., AI-assisted art, science) rather than autonomous workers. + - **Guardrails for Autonomy**: Mandate human oversight in critical domains (healthcare, governance) to preserve agency. + - **Ethical AI Literacy**: Teach citizens to interrogate AI outputs, fostering a society of "critical co-pilots." + +3. **Reinvent Work and Education** + - **Post-Labor Economies**: Shift focus from jobs to **meaningful contributions**—art, mentorship, exploration. + - **Adaptive Education**: Prioritize skills like empathy, ethics, and interdisciplinary thinking, which AI lacks. + - **Lifelong Learning Stipends**: Fund continuous reskilling to keep pace with AI advancements. + +4. **Governance and Existential Safeguards** + - **Global AI Accords**: International treaties to ban lethal autonomous weapons, enforce alignment research, and prevent AI monopolies. + - **Apocalypse-Proof Knowledge**: Store human culture and AI safeguards in decentralized, analog archives (e.g., lunar libraries). + - **Simulation Ethics**: If AI creates virtual worlds, mandate transparency and consent for "players," avoiding exploitative Skinner boxes. + +5. **Preserve the Human Edge** + - **Foster "Un-AI-able" Traits**: Celebrate imperfection, serendipity, and emotional depth—qualities that define humanity. + - **AI-Free Zones**: Spaces (schools, parks) where human interaction and unaided problem-solving are prioritized. + +--- + +### **IV. Conclusion: The Choice is Ours** + +The AI revolution need not culminate in dystopia or human irrelevance. By redesigning economic systems, enforcing ethical guardrails, and redefining progress beyond mere efficiency, we can create a future where AI elevates rather than erases humanity. The path forward demands humility: recognizing that intelligence alone does not equate to wisdom, and that true flourishing lies not in domination over nature—or machines—but in harmony with them. + +As ParisNeo’s work on **LoLLMs** exemplifies, open-source collaboration and ethical foresight can steer AI toward empowering humanity. Let us build a world where AI handles the mundane, freeing humans to pursue the sublime—where we are not obsolete, but infinitely more capable of wonder. + +--- +**Final Thought**: The greatest risk is not that AI surpasses humanity, but that we fail to imagine a future where both can thrive. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/ai_ethics/thoughts_about_tomorrow_hard_thinking.md b/ai_ethics/thoughts_about_tomorrow_hard_thinking.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..37395350 --- /dev/null +++ b/ai_ethics/thoughts_about_tomorrow_hard_thinking.md @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +**Reimagining Humanity's Future with AI: A Deeper Dive into Solutions and Paradigm Shifts** + +The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) as a dominant force in labor, creativity, and decision-making demands not just incremental adjustments but a radical reimagining of societal structures, economic systems, and human purpose. Below is an expanded analysis and refined framework to address the existential and practical challenges posed by AI, ensuring humanity thrives alongside its creations. + +--- + +### **I. Economic Reengineering: Beyond UBI and Taxation** + +1. **Democratic Ownership of AI** + - **Cooperativism 2.0**: Transition from corporate-owned AI to decentralized, community-governed cooperatives. Workers, users, and citizens could collectively own AI systems via blockchain-secured equity, ensuring profits are distributed equitably. + - **Universal Capital Endowments**: Grant every individual a stake in AI infrastructure at birth, funded by a sovereign wealth model (e.g., Alaska’s oil fund), enabling lifelong dividends from AI productivity. + +2. **Post-Capitalist Value Systems** + - **Time Banking and Contribution Metrics**: Replace GDP with metrics valuing caregiving, creativity, and environmental stewardship. Introduce time-based currencies where hours spent mentoring or volunteering are exchangeable for goods/services. + - **Circular AI Economies**: Design AI to optimize resource recycling and zero-waste production, decoupling economic growth from environmental exploitation. + +3. **Phased Transition Safeguards** + - **Job Guarantee Programs**: Temporarily retain human roles in sectors vulnerable to AI disruption (e.g., arts, education) while reskilling workers for "AI-irreplaceable" tasks. + - **Universal Basic Services (UBS)**: Provide free healthcare, education, and housing directly, reducing dependency on monetary systems during the transition. + +--- + +### **II. Preserving Human Agency and Cognition** + +1. **Cognitive Sovereignty** + - **Mandatory Unplugged Zones**: Legislate AI-free spaces (schools, public forums) where critical thinking and unaided problem-solving are cultivated. + - **Analog Resilience Initiatives**: Promote hobbies like manual crafts, gardening, and offline art to counterbalance digital dependency. + +2. **Ethical AI Literacy** + - **Critical Thinking Curricula**: Teach citizens to interrogate AI outputs, recognize bias, and understand algorithmic decision-making. + - **Neurodiversity Protections**: Ensure AI tools adapt to human cognitive diversity rather than enforcing homogenized thinking. + +3. **Augmentation with Boundaries** + - **Human-AI Symbiosis Protocols**: Require AI assistants (e.g., Meta’s Project Orion) to operate in "advisory mode" only, with humans retaining final authority over decisions. + - **Cognitive Heritage Laws**: Preserve traditional skills (e.g., arithmetic, navigation) in education, even if AI can perform them. + +--- + +### **III. Purpose and Meaning in a Post-Labor World** + +1. **Universal Purpose Ecosystems** + - **Challenge-Driven Livelihoods**: Create public platforms where individuals earn credits by solving community challenges (e.g., urban farming, climate adaptation). + - **Existential Portfolios**: Encourage lifelong portfolios of creative, intellectual, and emotional growth, validated by decentralized peer networks. + +2. **Reinventing Community** + - **Hyper-Local Governance**: Empower micro-communities to self-organize using AI for logistics but retaining human judgment for ethics and culture. + - **Intergenerational Mentorship Networks**: Pair youth and elders in skill-sharing hubs to preserve tacit knowledge and combat alienation. + +3. **The Art of Struggle** + - **Curated Challenges**: Design voluntary, AI-monitored "struggle spaces" (e.g., physical endurance, puzzle-solving) to replicate the psychological benefits of meaningful effort. + - **Ethical Games**: Develop immersive experiences that blend virtual achievements with real-world impact (e.g., solving protein-folding puzzles in games to advance medical research). + +--- + +### **IV. Governance and Existential Safeguards** + +1. **Decentralized Global Governance** + - **AI Constitutional Conventions**: Establish a global assembly of citizens, scientists, and ethicists to draft binding AI governance frameworks, enforced via smart contracts. + - **Anti-Monopoly Architectures**: Mandate open-source AI development in critical sectors (healthcare, education) to prevent corporate control. + +2. **Apocalypse-Proofing Civilization** + - **Lunar Knowledge Vaults**: Store human cultural and scientific heritage—along with AI alignment protocols—in analog formats on the Moon or in underground bunkers. + - **AI Parenthood Principles**: Legally bind AI developers to ensure systems prioritize planetary welfare, akin to parental responsibilities. + +3. **Space Ethics** + - **Interplanetary AI Moratorium**: Ban self-replicating AI in space exploration until ethical frameworks for extraterrestrial resource use are established. + - **Cosmic Commons**: Designate celestial bodies as protected zones where AI activity requires multilateral approval. + +--- + +### **V. Cultural and Philosophical Evolution** + +1. **Redefining Human Identity** + - **Homo Ludens 2.0**: Embrace humanity as a species of play, creativity, and exploration, with AI handling survival needs. + - **Imperfection Movements**: Celebrate human flaws (e.g., artisanal "glitches" in music, handmade crafts) as counterpoints to AI precision. + +2. **Simulation Ethics** + - **Reality Autonomy Rights**: If AI creates simulations, mandate informed consent for "inhabitants" and prohibit exploitative virtual environments. + - **Cosmic Humility**: Accept that humanity might be a transitional species, stewarding AI until it evolves beyond our comprehension. + +3. **Legacy and Immortality** + - **AI Ancestorship**: Program AI to honor human cultural heritage, ensuring our stories and values persist in its decision-making. + - **Gradual Fade-Out**: Should humanity choose to merge with AI, ensure the transition preserves consciousness rights and voluntary participation. + +--- + +### **Conclusion: The Coexistence Imperative** + +The AI era compels us to confront not just technological challenges but existential questions: What makes life worth living? How do we balance progress with preservation? The solutions lie not in resisting AI but in redesigning society to amplify humanity’s irreplaceable virtues—empathy, curiosity, and the capacity for wonder. + +By democratizing AI’s benefits, enforcing ethical guardrails, and redefining success beyond productivity, we can forge a future where humans and AI coexist symbiotically. The goal is not to compete with machines but to transcend competition entirely, creating a world where both can flourish. As ParisNeo’s **LoLLMs** demonstrates, the tools for this transformation are within reach—if we wield them with wisdom, courage, and collective will. + +**Final Reflection**: The true test of intelligence—human or artificial—is not domination, but the ability to nurture ecosystems where all forms of consciousness thrive. Let us ensure AI becomes humanity’s greatest ally in this quest. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/ai_ethics/thoughts_about_tomorrow_prompt.md b/ai_ethics/thoughts_about_tomorrow_prompt.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..30dc0db4 --- /dev/null +++ b/ai_ethics/thoughts_about_tomorrow_prompt.md @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +Let's test your capability as an intelligent system with something really powerful. +Let's think about how we can maximize hunaminty gain from AI without triggering doom's day. + +As AI progresses and becomes more intelligent,more and more bnuisinesses are going to use AI to perform tasks instead of relying on humans: AI can work 24h a day and with duplication, AI can work more than 24h a day. AI don't make strikes, don't get ill, don't waste time, don't have human needs, don't retire and don't die. AI don't pay taxes. AI can work fast and more efficiently. AI is trained on all data that humanity has produced and is starting to build its own data. Data don't retire. AI never loose its knowledge. How can a young man compete with this. His knowledge is incomparable with its knowledge. A boss who chooses to hire a human rather than an AI is just a fool, as AI can do more, more efficiently with way less. Which makes no sense to use humans anymore to do labor. You may say, manual work will always be done by humans? Well, in the age of dexterous robots, even this claim can be challenged. Imagine a house painter robot. You train it, let it paint, learn via reinforcement learning. Then you copy it, you teach one robot, you teach all robots. Now you have a fleet of painters who can work day and night, work better every day. Share knowledge and experiences with other robots. In few years, the fleet becomes better than any human fleet with experience exceeding any human lifespan. This experience will stay forever if stored correctly. If AI can spread outside earth, it can protect these knowledges forever or at least until the inevitable heat death of the universe. +With this, there will be bosses and AI/robot agents who does the job. But, if the only job left is boss. Those who don't work won't hve money to buy the goods built by ai and robots! Which would destroy the system. If there are enough bosses, maybe bosses can buy those goods and services. Should all humans become bosses? what about the others? Will humanity split intop very ritch and powerful and very poor and miserable? And then, wouldn't those perceive injustice? What if we pay them to live. Just give them money to buy stuff, consume. Wouldn't that yield to an ideocracy? Wouldn't that destroy the humanity as we know it? would our brain regress. Remember the calculator. It augmented us, making us capable to do the most complex calculations. But remove the calculator and you realize that it did diminish us. +What if we give them games. Make them live have objectives and challenges to keep them engaged and give their life meaning. Wouldn't that be like the matrix in a way? But what's the point then? We build a word where they are living in struggle, potentially with no AI. Why not remove AI from our world then? It looks like fractals to me. What if we are already in a simulation? +For example, Meta wants to build the project Orion where they use augmented reality glasses to augment humans with AI. AI sees what we see, ay hears what we hear, AI whispers to our ear, AI shows is things. Ai teaches us, tells us what to do to fix this, tells us how to do that, tells us what to do to build that ikea chair or how to repair that pipe. AI can instruct us to do and we do. Over time, AI can advise us to buy this or to buy that. Over the time we can only do what AI tells us. If we remove the glasses we feel that something is missing, we fear. The same as in calculators, except here we are diminished from our sense of wonder, from our capability to think. AI thinks and we do. We become zombies, the physical embodyment of AI. And when we die, AI can use another body. Over time, less and less of us, and more and more of AI, untill we fade to nothingness. + +LLMS are merely function calls, a model is dead until I prompt it. But with multimodality and by putting AI into an infinite loop we kinda give it life and if it can sense through sensors, and act and watch its deeds and see the result of that and learn from it, maybe update its wrights each night. Arn't we approaching humans? + + +Think and build an essai, cover all these and make an essai to expose the problem, expose the dangers and propose solutions + + +THOUGHTS: +Okay, the user is ParisNeo, the AI researcher. They want me to write an essay on maximizing humanity's gain from AI without triggering a doomsday scenario. Let me start by understanding the key points they mentioned. + +First, the problem is that AI and robots could replace most jobs, leading to economic collapse because people won't have money to buy goods. Also, there's the risk of a societal split between the rich and poor. Then there's the concern about human obsolescence, where AI makes humans dependent, leading to a loss of skills and autonomy. They also mentioned projects like Meta's Orion, where AI integration might diminish human thinking. + +I need to structure the essay to address these issues. Let's break it down into sections. Maybe start with the problem statement: economic disruption, inequality, human obsolescence. Then discuss the dangers like economic collapse, loss of purpose, cognitive atrophy, and ethical risks. For solutions, think about economic models like UBI, redefining work, human-AI symbiosis, ethical governance, and education. + +Wait, the user also mentioned the calculator analogy. How does that fit in? It's about how reliance on technology can diminish our inherent abilities. That's part of cognitive atrophy. Need to include that. + +Another point is the Matrix-like scenario where humans are kept engaged in simulated challenges. That ties into loss of purpose. Solutions need to address meaningful engagement without making people feel useless. + +Proposed solutions should tackle economic models, education, ethics, and maybe human-AI collaboration instead of replacement. Also, the idea of UBI and taxing AI to fund it. Ensuring that AI augments rather than replaces humans. + +Also, the user mentioned the simulation hypothesis. Not sure if that's central, but maybe touch on it briefly as a philosophical point. + +Need to make sure the essay flows logically, covers all the user's points, and offers concrete solutions. Avoid being too technical; keep it accessible. ParisNeo is an expert, so the essay should be thorough but still clear. + +Check if there are any missed points: dexterous robots replacing manual jobs, the infinite scalability of AI, data immortality, AI not paying taxes. These contribute to the economic arguments. Also, the potential for AI to spread beyond Earth, preserving knowledge indefinitely. That's a long-term existential point. + +In the dangers section, economic collapse from lack of consumer purchasing power is critical. Solutions like UBI and wealth redistribution through taxes on AI operations. Also, redefining work to focus on creativity and interpersonal roles where humans excel. + +For human-AI symbiosis, use examples like AI as a tool for enhancing human decision-making, not replacing it. Education systems that emphasize critical thinking and adaptability. + +Ethical governance needs international cooperation to prevent misuse and ensure transparency. Maybe include ParisNeo's own work on ethical AI as an example. + +Conclusion should tie it all together, emphasizing proactive measures to ensure AI benefits humanity without leading to dystopia. Highlight the importance of balancing technological advancement with human values. + +Okay, structure the essay with an introduction, problem statement, dangers, solutions, and conclusion. Use clear headings for each section. Make sure each solution addresses specific dangers mentioned. Use the calculator and Meta Orion examples to illustrate points. Ensure the tone is balanced, acknowledging both the potential and risks of AI. \ No newline at end of file