ExternalVendorCode/heads
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/linuxboot/heads.git synced 2024-12-24 15:16:42 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
94dab7eedf
heads/patches/coreboot-4.11/0072-crossgcc-gnat-eh.patch

277 lines
13 KiB
Diff
Raw Blame History

diff --git a/util/crossgcc/patches/gcc-8.3.0_gnat_eh.patch b/util/crossgcc/patches/gcc-8.3.0_gnat_eh.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..151a3e6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/util/crossgcc/patches/gcc-8.3.0_gnat_eh.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,270 @@
+commit 5d733372faa97c1c3943a20a252d000db37c738b
+Author: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>
+Date: Fri Aug 2 18:46:51 2019 +0000
+
+ rework Ada EH Machine_Occurrence deallocation
+
+ Introduce exception handler ABI #1 to ensure single release, no access
+ after release of reraised Machine_Occurrences, and no failure to
+ re-reraise a Machine_Occurrence.
+
+ Unlike Ada exceptions, foreign exceptions do not get a new
+ Machine_Occurrence upon reraise, but each handler would delete the
+ exception upon completion, normal or exceptional, save for the case of
+ a 'raise;' statement within the handler, that avoided the delete by
+ clearing the exception pointer that the cleanup would use to release
+ it. The cleared exception pointer might then be used by a subsequent
+ reraise within the same handler. Get_Current_Excep.all would also
+ expose the Machine_Occurrence to reuse by Reraise_Occurrence, even for
+ native exceptions.
+
+ Under ABI #1, Begin_Handler_v1 claims responsibility for releasing an
+ exception by saving its cleanup and setting it to Claimed_Cleanup.
+ End_Handler_v1 restores the cleanup and runs it, as long as it isn't
+ still Claimed_Cleanup (which indicates an enclosing handler has
+ already claimed responsibility for releasing it), and as long as the
+ same exception is not being propagated up (the next handler of the
+ propagating exception will then claim responsibility for releasing
+ it), so reraise no longer needs to clear the exception pointer, and it
+ can just propagate the exception, just like Reraise_Occurrence.
+
+ ABI #1 is fully interoperable with ABI #0, i.e., exception handlers
+ that call the #0 primitives can be linked together with ones that call
+ the #1 primitives, and they will not misbehave. When a #1 handler
+ claims responsibility for releasing an exception, even #0 reraises
+ dynamically nested within it will refrain from releasing it. However,
+ when a #0 handler is a handler of a foreign exception that would have
+ been responsible for releasing it with #1, a Reraise_Occurrence of
+ that foreign or other Machine_Occurrence-carrying exception may still
+ cause the exception to be released multiple times, and to be used
+ after it is first released, even if other handlers of the foreign
+ exception use #1.
+
+
+ for gcc/ada/ChangeLog
+
+ * libgnat/a-exexpr.adb (Begin_Handler_v1, End_Handler_v1): New.
+ (Claimed_Cleanup): New.
+ (Begin_Handler, End_Handler): Document.
+ * gcc-interface/trans.c (gigi): Switch to exception handler
+ ABI #1.
+ (Exception_Handler_to_gnu_gcc): Save the original cleanup
+ returned by begin handler, pass it to end handler, and use
+ EH_ELSE_EXPR to pass a propagating exception to end handler.
+ (gnat_to_gnu): Leave the exception pointer alone for reraise.
+ (add_cleanup): Handle EH_ELSE_EXPR, require it by itself.
+
+ From-SVN: r274029
+
+diff --git a/gcc/ada/libgnat/a-exexpr.adb b/gcc/ada/libgnat/a-exexpr.adb
+index b1aa1c6e6ba..5e72fd6e3f2 100644
+--- a/gcc/ada/libgnat/a-exexpr.adb
++++ b/gcc/ada/libgnat/a-exexpr.adb
+@@ -197,15 +197,75 @@ package body Exception_Propagation is
+ -- whose machine occurrence is Mo. The message is empty, the backtrace
+ -- is empty too and the exception identity is Foreign_Exception.
+
+- -- Hooks called when entering/leaving an exception handler for a given
+- -- occurrence, aimed at handling the stack of active occurrences. The
+- -- calls are generated by gigi in tree_transform/N_Exception_Handler.
++ -- Hooks called when entering/leaving an exception handler for a
++ -- given occurrence. The calls are generated by gigi in
++ -- Exception_Handler_to_gnu_gcc.
++
++ -- Begin_Handler_v1, called when entering an exception handler,
++ -- claims responsibility for the handler to release the
++ -- GCC_Exception occurrence. End_Handler_v1, called when
++ -- leaving the handler, releases the occurrence, unless the
++ -- occurrence is propagating further up, or the handler is
++ -- dynamically nested in the context of another handler that
++ -- claimed responsibility for releasing that occurrence.
++
++ -- Responsibility is claimed by changing the Cleanup field to
++ -- Claimed_Cleanup, which enables claimed exceptions to be
++ -- recognized, and avoids accidental releases even by foreign
++ -- handlers.
++
++ function Begin_Handler_v1
++ (GCC_Exception : not null GCC_Exception_Access)
++ return System.Address;
++ pragma Export (C, Begin_Handler_v1, "__gnat_begin_handler_v1");
++ -- Called when entering an exception handler. Claim
++ -- responsibility for releasing GCC_Exception, by setting the
++ -- cleanup/release function to Claimed_Cleanup, and return the
++ -- address of the previous cleanup/release function.
++
++ procedure End_Handler_v1
++ (GCC_Exception : not null GCC_Exception_Access;
++ Saved_Cleanup : System.Address;
++ Propagating_Exception : GCC_Exception_Access);
++ pragma Export (C, End_Handler_v1, "__gnat_end_handler_v1");
++ -- Called when leaving an exception handler. Restore the
++ -- Saved_Cleanup in the GCC_Exception occurrence, and then release
++ -- it, unless it remains claimed by an enclosing handler, or
++ -- GCC_Exception and Propagating_Exception are the same
++ -- occurrence. Propagating_Exception could be either an
++ -- occurrence (re)raised within the handler of GCC_Exception, when
++ -- we're executing as an exceptional cleanup, or null, if we're
++ -- completing the handler of GCC_Exception normally.
++
++ procedure Claimed_Cleanup
++ (Reason : Unwind_Reason_Code;
++ GCC_Exception : not null GCC_Exception_Access);
++ pragma Export (C, Claimed_Cleanup, "__gnat_claimed_cleanup");
++ -- A do-nothing placeholder installed as GCC_Exception.Cleanup
++ -- while handling GCC_Exception, to claim responsibility for
++ -- releasing it, and to stop it from being accidentally released.
++
++ -- The following are version 0 implementations of the version 1
++ -- hooks above. They remain in place for compatibility with the
++ -- output of compilers that still use version 0, such as those
++ -- used during bootstrap. They are interoperable with the v1
++ -- hooks, except that the older versions may malfunction when
++ -- handling foreign exceptions passed to Reraise_Occurrence.
+
+ procedure Begin_Handler (GCC_Exception : not null GCC_Exception_Access);
+ pragma Export (C, Begin_Handler, "__gnat_begin_handler");
++ -- Called when entering an exception handler translated by an old
++ -- compiler. It does nothing.
+
+ procedure End_Handler (GCC_Exception : GCC_Exception_Access);
+ pragma Export (C, End_Handler, "__gnat_end_handler");
++ -- Called when leaving an exception handler translated by an old
++ -- compiler. It releases GCC_Exception, unless it is null. It is
++ -- only ever null when the handler has a 'raise;' translated by a
++ -- v0-using compiler. The artificial handler variable passed to
++ -- End_Handler was set to null to tell End_Handler to refrain from
++ -- releasing the reraised exception. In v1 safer ways are used to
++ -- accomplish that.
+
+ --------------------------------------------------------------------
+ -- Accessors to Basic Components of a GNAT Exception Data Pointer --
+@@ -352,6 +412,128 @@ package body Exception_Propagation is
+ end if;
+ end Setup_Current_Excep;
+
++ ----------------------
++ -- Begin_Handler_v1 --
++ ----------------------
++
++ function Begin_Handler_v1
++ (GCC_Exception : not null GCC_Exception_Access)
++ return System.Address is
++ Saved_Cleanup : constant System.Address := GCC_Exception.Cleanup;
++ begin
++ -- Claim responsibility for releasing this exception, and stop
++ -- others from releasing it.
++ GCC_Exception.Cleanup := Claimed_Cleanup'Address;
++ return Saved_Cleanup;
++ end Begin_Handler_v1;
++
++ --------------------
++ -- End_Handler_v1 --
++ --------------------
++
++ procedure End_Handler_v1
++ (GCC_Exception : not null GCC_Exception_Access;
++ Saved_Cleanup : System.Address;
++ Propagating_Exception : GCC_Exception_Access) is
++ begin
++ GCC_Exception.Cleanup := Saved_Cleanup;
++ -- Restore the Saved_Cleanup, so that it is either used to
++ -- release GCC_Exception below, or transferred to the next
++ -- handler of the Propagating_Exception occurrence. The
++ -- following test ensures that an occurrence is only released
++ -- once, even after reraises.
++ --
++ -- The idea is that the GCC_Exception is not to be released
++ -- unless it had an unclaimed Cleanup when the handler started
++ -- (see Begin_Handler_v1 above), but if we propagate across its
++ -- handler a reraise of the same exception, we transfer to the
++ -- Propagating_Exception the responsibility for running the
++ -- Saved_Cleanup when its handler completes.
++ --
++ -- This ownership transfer mechanism ensures safety, as in
++ -- single release and no dangling pointers, because there is no
++ -- way to hold on to the Machine_Occurrence of an
++ -- Exception_Occurrence: the only situations in which another
++ -- Exception_Occurrence gets the same Machine_Occurrence are
++ -- through Reraise_Occurrence, and plain reraise, and so we
++ -- have the following possibilities:
++ --
++ -- - Reraise_Occurrence is handled within the running handler,
++ -- and so when completing the dynamically nested handler, we
++ -- must NOT release the exception. A Claimed_Cleanup upon
++ -- entry of the nested handler, installed when entering the
++ -- enclosing handler, ensures the exception will not be
++ -- released by the nested handler, but rather by the enclosing
++ -- handler.
++ --
++ -- - Reraise_Occurrence/reraise escapes the running handler,
++ -- and we run as an exceptional cleanup for GCC_Exception. The
++ -- Saved_Cleanup was reinstalled, but since we're propagating
++ -- the same machine occurrence, we do not release it. Instead,
++ -- we transfer responsibility for releasing it to the eventual
++ -- handler of the propagating exception.
++ --
++ -- - An unrelated exception propagates through the running
++ -- handler. We restored GCC_Exception.Saved_Cleanup above.
++ -- Since we're propagating a different exception, we proceed to
++ -- release GCC_Exception, unless Saved_Cleanup was
++ -- Claimed_Cleanup, because then we know we're not in the
++ -- outermost handler for GCC_Exception.
++ --
++ -- - The handler completes normally, so it reinstalls the
++ -- Saved_Cleanup and runs it, unless it was Claimed_Cleanup.
++ -- If Saved_Cleanup is null, Unwind_DeleteException (currently)
++ -- has no effect, so we could skip it, but if it is ever
++ -- changed to do more in this case, we're ready for that,
++ -- calling it exactly once.
++ if Saved_Cleanup /= Claimed_Cleanup'Address
++ and then
++ Propagating_Exception /= GCC_Exception
++ then
++ declare
++ Current : constant EOA := Get_Current_Excep.all;
++ Cur_Occ : constant GCC_Exception_Access
++ := To_GCC_Exception (Current.Machine_Occurrence);
++ begin
++ -- If we are releasing the Machine_Occurrence of the current
++ -- exception, reset the access to it, so that it is no
++ -- longer accessible.
++ if Cur_Occ = GCC_Exception then
++ Current.Machine_Occurrence := System.Null_Address;
++ end if;
++ end;
++ Unwind_DeleteException (GCC_Exception);
++ end if;
++ end End_Handler_v1;
++
++ ---------------------
++ -- Claimed_Cleanup --
++ ---------------------
++
++ procedure Claimed_Cleanup
++ (Reason : Unwind_Reason_Code;
++ GCC_Exception : not null GCC_Exception_Access) is
++ pragma Unreferenced (Reason);
++ pragma Unreferenced (GCC_Exception);
++ begin
++ -- This procedure should never run. If it does, it's either a
++ -- version 0 handler or a foreign handler, attempting to
++ -- release an exception while a version 1 handler that claimed
++ -- responsibility for releasing the exception remains still
++ -- active. This placeholder stops GCC_Exception from being
++ -- released by them.
++
++ -- We could get away with just Null_Address instead, with
++ -- nearly the same effect, but with this placeholder we can
++ -- detect and report unexpected releases, and we can tell apart
++ -- a GCC_Exception without a Cleanup, from one with another
++ -- active handler, so as to still call Unwind_DeleteException
++ -- exactly once: currently, Unwind_DeleteException does nothing
++ -- when the Cleanup is null, but should it ever be changed to
++ -- do more, we'll still be safe.
++ null;
++ end Claimed_Cleanup;
++
+ -------------------
+ -- Begin_Handler --
+ -------------------
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink