Add newly released mold version 2.36.0 from upstream https://github.com/rui314/mold New Features - The --package-metadata=<string> option has been added to embed a given string into the .note.package section. This option is designed for build scripts that generate binary packages, such as .rpm or .deb, to include package metadata in each executable. It simplifies the process of identifying the corresponding package for a given executable or core file. (7ddc8f4) - [ARM][PowerPC] We've improved the algorithm for creating range extension thunks to reduce memory usage and improve speed. For example, linking clang-19 for ARM64 is now ~7% faster than before. (9fc0ace) - [RISC-V][LoongArch] We've improved the algorithm for code-shrinking linker relaxation to reduce memory usage and improve speed. For example, linking clang-19 for RISC-V is now ~4% faster than before. (3234d88) Bug Fixes and Compatibility Improvements - mold created a bad relocation for an IFUNC if the linker's output file type was a shared library and the symbol was exported. This bug could cause a segmentation fault of a linked program. The problem has now been fixed. (a297859) - [RISC-V] mold could produce incorrect code as a result of code-shrinking relaxation for the R_RISCV_HI20 relocation. That type of relocation was used rarely because it is not PC-relative. That being said, if your program used the relocation, and the relocation targets were at a low address (from 0x1f800 to 0x20000), your program would crash at runtime due to the linker's bug. The issue has now been resolved. (eec3f6b) - [RISC-V][LoongArch] When the linker removed instructions from a function as a result of code-shrinking relaxation, the function symbol's size in the output file should be updated to reflect the result of relaxation, even though doing it is mostly cosmetic. mold did not do that. Now, mold sets correct sizes to output function symbols. (e6345d5) - [LoongArch] Binaries linked with mold now work on 64 KiB page systems. Previously, only up to 16 KiB pages were supported. (2d7b6b2) - [s390x] The s390x processor-specific ABI requires the linker to reserve the first three slots of the .got section for the runtime. mold, however, reserved only two slots and used the third for itself. Even though we did not observe issues in the wild, it was a violation of the psABI. The problem has now been fixed. (dfce2fc) Signed-off-by: Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Crosstool-NG
Introduction
Crosstool-NG aims at building toolchains. Toolchains are an essential component in a software development project. It will compile, assemble and link the code that is being developed. Some pieces of the toolchain will eventually end up in the resulting binaries: static libraries are but an example.
Before reporting a bug, please read bug reporting guidelines. Bugs that do not provide the required information will be closed without explanation.
Refer to documentation at crosstool-NG website for more information on how to configure, install and use crosstool-NG.
Note 1: If you elect to build a uClibc-based toolchain, you will have to prepare a config file for uClibc with <= crosstool-NG-1.21.0. In >= crosstool-NG-1.22.0 you only need to prepare a config file for uClibc(or uClibc-ng) if you really need a custom config for uClibc.
Note 2: If you call ct-ng --help
you will get help for make(2)
. This is because ct-ng is in fact a make(2)
script. There is no clean workaround for this.
Repository layout
To clone the crosstool-NG repository:
git clone https://github.com/crosstool-ng/crosstool-ng
Build Status
Old repositories
These are the old Mercurial repositories. They are now read-only: http://crosstool-ng.org/hg/
Pull Requests and Issues
You can find open Pull Requests on GitHub here and you can find open issues here.
Contributing
To contribute to crosstool-NG it is helpful to provide as much information as you can about your change, including any updates to documentation (if appropriate), and test... test... test.
- Fork crosstool-ng on github
- Clone the fork you made to your computer
git clone https://github.com/crosstool-ng/crosstool-ng
- Create a topic branch for your work
git checkout -b fix_comment_typo
- Make changes
- hack
- test
- hack
- etc...
- Add your changes
git add [file(s) that changed, add -p if you want to be more specific]
- Verify you are happy with your changes to be commited
git diff --cached
- Commit changes
git commit -s
The -s
automatically adds your Signed-off-by: [name] <email>
to your commit message. Your commit will be rejected without this.
Also, please explain what your change does. "Fix stuff"
will be rejected. For examples of good commit messages, read the changelog.
- Push your topic branch with your changes to your fork
git push origin fix_comment_typo
- Go to the crosstool-ng project and click the
Compare & pull request
button for the branch you want to open a pull request with. - Review the pull request changes, and verify that you are opening a pull request for the appropriate branch. The title and message should reflect the nature/theme of the changes in the PR, say the title is
Fix comment typos
and the message details any specifics you can provide. - You might change the crosstool-ng branch, if you are opening a pull request that is intended for a different branch. For example, when you created your topic branch you could have done:
git checkout -b fix_out_of_date_patch origin/1.22
Then when you get to this pull request screen change the base branch from master
to 1.22
- By creating a pull request, the PR is entered into the backlog. A travis-ci job will run to test your changes against a select set of samples. As they start to get worked, they should be placed in the
Ready
state. PRs that are being worked areIn Progress
. If a questions come up about the commit that might involve changes to the commit then the PR is placed inWaiting For Response
, you have two options:
- Fix the issue with the commit by adding a new commit in the topic branch that fixes the code review. Then push your changes to your branch. This option keeps the comments in the PR, and allows for further code review. I personally dislike this, because people are lazy and fix reviews with
fix more review issues
. Please make good commit messages! All rules about commits from above apply! THIS IS PREFERED
Add your changes
git add [file(s) that changed, add -p if you want to be more specific]
Verify you are happy with your changes to be commited
git diff --cached
Commit changes
git commit -s
- Push your topic branch with your changes to your fork
git push origin fix_comment_typo
At this point the PR will be updated to have the latest commit to that branch, and can be subsequently reviewed.
- Interactively rebase the offending commit(s) to fix the code review. This option is slightly annoying on Github, as the comments are stored with the commits, and are hidden when new commits replace the old commits. They used to disappear completely; now Github shows a grey 'View outdated' link next to the old commits.
This recipe also comes handy with other issues, like your topic branch not being up-to-date with master:
git fetch --all
git rebase --ignore-whitespace origin master
git rebase -i <offending-commit-id>^
NOTE: The --ignore-whitespace
stops git apply
(which is called by rebase) from changing any whitespace when it runs.
Replace pick
with edit
or remove the line to delete a commit.
Fix the issue in the code review.
git add [file(s)]
git rebase --continue
<update commit comment if needed>
git push --force origin fix_comment_typo
Patchwork
We previously used patchwork for development, but it is no longer used. I'd like to see patches that are still applicable turned into Pull Requests on GitHub.
You can find the list of pending patches available on patchwork.
More Info
You can find all of this and more at crosstool-ng.org
Report issues at the project site on GitHub.
We have a mailing list. Archive and subscription info can be found here: https://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/
Aloha! :-)