crosstool-ng/patches/gcc/3.3.3/pr11736-1-test.patch
Yann E. MORIN" 1906cf93f8 Add the full crosstool-NG sources to the new repository of its own.
You might just say: 'Yeah! crosstool-NG's got its own repo!".
Unfortunately, that's because the previous repo got damaged beyond repair and I had no backup.
That means I'm putting backups in place in the afternoon.
That also means we've lost history... :-(
2007-02-24 11:00:05 +00:00

49 lines
1.4 KiB
Diff

--- /dev/null Sat Dec 14 13:56:51 2002
+++ gcc-3.3.1/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr11736-1.c Sun Sep 14 14:26:33 2003
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+/* PR optimization/11736
+ * Reporter: marcus@mc.pp.se
+ * Summary: Stackpointer messed up on SuperH
+ * Keywords: wrong-code
+ * Description:
+ * When a function with 5 arguments is called in both branches of a
+ * conditional, and only the last argument differs, the code to push that
+ * last argument on the stack gets confused.
+ * Space for the fifth argument is reserved on the stack by the
+ * instruction I have marked as "A". However, if the else-branch is
+ * taken the stackpointer is decremented _again_ at "B". This
+ * decrementation is never restored, and it is only due to the
+ * restoration of r15 from r14 that the function works at all. With
+ * -fomit-frame-pointer it will crash.
+ *
+ * Testcase tweaked by dank@kegel.com
+ * Not marked as xfail since it's a regression from hardhat 2.0 gcc-2.97
+ * and dodes gcc-3.0.2
+ */
+
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O1 -fomit-frame-pointer" } */
+
+int expected_e;
+
+void bar(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e)
+{
+ if (e != expected_e)
+ abort();
+}
+
+void foo(int a)
+{
+ if (a)
+ bar(0, 0, 0, 0, 1);
+ else
+ bar(0, 0, 0, 0, 0); /* stack pointer decremented extra time here, causing segfault */
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+ for (expected_e = 0; expected_e < 2; expected_e++)
+ foo(expected_e);
+ return 0;
+}