mirror of
https://github.com/crosstool-ng/crosstool-ng.git
synced 2024-12-21 05:43:09 +00:00
1906cf93f8
You might just say: 'Yeah! crosstool-NG's got its own repo!". Unfortunately, that's because the previous repo got damaged beyond repair and I had no backup. That means I'm putting backups in place in the afternoon. That also means we've lost history... :-(
75 lines
2.6 KiB
Diff
75 lines
2.6 KiB
Diff
See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-08/msg00256.html
|
|
|
|
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 21:13:43 -0400
|
|
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
|
|
To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
|
|
Subject: Re: Handle SEC_LINK_DUPLICATES_SAME_CONTENTS for arm-linux
|
|
Message-ID: <20040821011342.GA30319@nevyn.them.org>
|
|
Mail-Followup-To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
|
|
References: <20040818145518.GA9774@nevyn.them.org> <20040819055040.GA11820@lucon.org> <20040819080034.GE21716@bubble.modra.org> <20040820173240.GA17678@nevyn.them.org> <20040821003737.GB16016@bubble.modra.org>
|
|
In-Reply-To: <20040821003737 dot GB16016 at bubble dot modra dot org>
|
|
|
|
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 10:07:38AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
|
|
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 01:32:40PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
|
|
> > Thanks. How's this?
|
|
>
|
|
> As you might have guessed from my rather slack review of your previous
|
|
> patch, I trust you enough to give the OK without proper review. But
|
|
> since you asked... :)
|
|
|
|
Checked in as so.
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Daniel Jacobowitz
|
|
|
|
2004-08-20 Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
|
|
|
|
* elflink.c (_bfd_elf_section_already_linked): Handle
|
|
SEC_LINK_DUPLICATES_SAME_CONTENTS.
|
|
|
|
Index: elflink.c
|
|
===================================================================
|
|
RCS file: /big/fsf/rsync/src-cvs/src/bfd/elflink.c,v
|
|
retrieving revision 1.97
|
|
diff -u -p -r1.97 elflink.c
|
|
--- binutils/bfd/elflink.c 18 Aug 2004 02:45:42 -0000 1.97
|
|
+++ binutils/bfd/elflink.c 21 Aug 2004 00:59:08 -0000
|
|
@@ -9366,6 +9366,36 @@ _bfd_elf_section_already_linked (bfd *ab
|
|
(_("%B: duplicate section `%A' has different size\n"),
|
|
abfd, sec);
|
|
break;
|
|
+
|
|
+ case SEC_LINK_DUPLICATES_SAME_CONTENTS:
|
|
+ if (sec->size != l->sec->size)
|
|
+ (*_bfd_error_handler)
|
|
+ (_("%B: duplicate section `%A' has different size\n"),
|
|
+ abfd, sec);
|
|
+ else if (sec->size != 0)
|
|
+ {
|
|
+ bfd_byte *sec_contents, *l_sec_contents;
|
|
+
|
|
+ if (!bfd_malloc_and_get_section (abfd, sec, &sec_contents))
|
|
+ (*_bfd_error_handler)
|
|
+ (_("%B: warning: could not read contents of section `%A'\n"),
|
|
+ abfd, sec);
|
|
+ else if (!bfd_malloc_and_get_section (l->sec->owner, l->sec,
|
|
+ &l_sec_contents))
|
|
+ (*_bfd_error_handler)
|
|
+ (_("%B: warning: could not read contents of section `%A'\n"),
|
|
+ l->sec->owner, l->sec);
|
|
+ else if (memcmp (sec_contents, l_sec_contents, sec->size) != 0)
|
|
+ (*_bfd_error_handler)
|
|
+ (_("%B: warning: duplicate section `%A' has different contents\n"),
|
|
+ abfd, sec);
|
|
+
|
|
+ if (sec_contents)
|
|
+ free (sec_contents);
|
|
+ if (l_sec_contents)
|
|
+ free (l_sec_contents);
|
|
+ }
|
|
+ break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Set the output_section field so that lang_add_section
|
|
|