crosstool-ng/patches/glibc/ports-2.10.1/220-section-comments.patch
Yann E. MORIN" 4b173045e9 libc/glibc: add 2.10.1
Woo... It seems the glibc guys finally decided that tarballs
were not deprecated, in fact.

The patchset was vampirised from Gentoo (kudos, guys!), and
applies to glibc+ports, so that's why it's been added as a
patchset against ports, not against glibc.
2009-11-13 21:37:18 +01:00

25 lines
1001 B
Diff

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-04/msg00665.html
fixes building on some architectures (like m68k/arm/cris/etc...) because
it does the right thing
diff -durN glibc-2.10.1.orig/include/libc-symbols.h glibc-2.10.1/include/libc-symbols.h
--- glibc-2.10.1.orig/include/libc-symbols.h 2009-03-14 00:51:46.000000000 +0100
+++ glibc-2.10.1/include/libc-symbols.h 2009-11-13 00:50:07.000000000 +0100
@@ -239,12 +239,12 @@
# define __make_section_unallocated(section_string)
# endif
-/* Tacking on "\n\t#" to the section name makes gcc put it's bogus
+/* Tacking on "\n#APP\n\t#" to the section name makes gcc put it's bogus
section attributes on what looks like a comment to the assembler. */
# ifdef HAVE_SECTION_QUOTES
-# define __sec_comment "\"\n\t#\""
+# define __sec_comment "\"\n#APP\n\t#\""
# else
-# define __sec_comment "\n\t#"
+# define __sec_comment "\n#APP\n\t#"
# endif
# define link_warning(symbol, msg) \
__make_section_unallocated (".gnu.warning." #symbol) \