crosstool-ng/docs/B - Known issues.txt
Yann E. MORIN" 30ad622618 misc: fix typos
Reported-by: "Antony N. Pavlov" <antony@niisi.msk.ru>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
2011-07-17 16:54:50 +02:00

196 lines
5.7 KiB
Plaintext

File.........: B - Known issues.txt
Copyright....: (C) 2010 Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
License......: Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike (CC-by-sa), v2.5
Known issues /
_____________/
This files lists the known issues encountered while developping crosstool-NG,
but that could not be addressed before the release.
The file has one section for each known issue, each section containing four
sub-sections: Symptoms, Explanations, Fix, and Workaround.
Each section is separated from the others with a lines of at least 4 dashes.
The following dummy section explains it all.
--------------------------------
Symptoms:
A one- or two-liner of what you would observe.
Usually, the error message you would see in the build logs.
Explanations:
An as much as possible in-depth explanations of the context, why it
happens, what has been investigated so far, and possible orientations
as how to try to solve this (eg. URLs, code snippets...).
Status:
Tells about the status of the issue:
UNCONFIRMED : missing information, or unable, to reproduce, but there
is consensus that there is an issue somewhere...
CURRENT : the issue is applicable.
DEPRECATED : the issue used to apply in some cases, but has not been
confirmed or reported again lately.
CLOSED : the issue is no longer valid, and a fix has been added
either as a patch to this component, and/or as a
workaround in the scripts and/or the configuration.
Fix:
What you have to do to fix it, if at all possible.
The fact that there is a fix, and yet this is a known issue means that
time to incorporate the fix in crosstool-NG was missing, or planned for
a future release.
Workaround:
What you can do to fix it *temporarily*, if at all possible.
A workaround is not a real fix, as it can break other parts of
crosstool-NG, but at least makes you going in your particular case.
So now, on for the real issues...
--------------------------------
Symptoms:
gcc is not found, although I *do* have gcc installed.
Explanations:
This is an issue on at least RHEL systems, where gcc is a symlink to ccache.
Because crosstool-NG create links to gcc for the build and host environment,
those symlinks are in fact pointing to ccache, which then doesn't know how
to run the compiler.
A possible fix could probably set the environment variable CCACHE_CC to the
actual compiler used.
Status:
CURRENT
Fix:
None known.
Workaround:
Uninstall ccache.
--------------------------------
Symptoms:
The extract and/or path steps fail under Cygwin.
Explanations:
This is not related to crosstool-NG. Mounts under Cygwin are by default not
case-sensitive. You have to use so-called "managed" mounts. See:
http://cygwin.com/faq.html section 4, question 32.
Status:
DEPRECATED
Fix:
Use "managed" mounts for the directories where you build *and* install your
toolchains.
Workaround:
None.
--------------------------------
Symptoms:
uClibc fails to build under Cygwin.
Explanations:
With uClibc, it is possible to build a cross-ldd. Unfortunately, it is
not (currently) possible to build this cross-ldd under Cygwin.
Status:
DEPRECATED
Fix:
None so far.
Workaround:
Disable the cross-ldd build.
--------------------------------
Symptoms:
On 64-bit build systems, the glibc (possibly eglibc too) build fails for
64-bit targets, because it can not find libgcc.
Explanations:
This issue has been observed when the companion libraries are built
statically. For an unknown reason, in this case, the libgcc built by the
core gcc is not located in the same place it is located when building
with shared companion libraries.
Status:
DEPRECATED
Fix:
None so far.
Workaround:
Build shared companion libraries.
--------------------------------
Symptoms:
libtool.m4: error: problem compiling FC test program
Explanations:
The gcc build procedure tries to run a Fortran test to see if it has a
working native fortran compiler installed on the build machine, and it
can't find one. A native Fortran compiler is needed (seems to be neede)
to build the Fortran frontend of the cross-compiler.
Even if you don't want to build the Fortran frontend, gcc tries to see
if it has one, but fails. This is no problem, as the Fortran frontend
will not be built. There is nothing to be worry about (unless you do
want to build the Fortran frontend, of course).
Status:
CURRENT
Fix:
None so far. It's a spurious error, so there will probably never be
a fix for this issue.
Workaround:
None needed, it's a spurious error.
--------------------------------
Symptoms:
unable to detect the exception model
Explanations:
On some architectures, proper stack unwinding (C++) requires that
setjmp/longjmp (sjlj) be used, while on other architectures do not
need sjlj. On some architectures, gcc is unable to determine whether
sjlj are needed or not.
Status:
CURRENT
Fix:
None so far.
Workaround:
Trying setting use of sjlj to either 'Y' or 'N' (instead of the
default 'M') in the menuconfig, option CT_CC_GCC_SJLJ_EXCEPTIONS
labelled "Use sjlj for exceptions".
--------------------------------
Symptoms:
configure: error: forced unwind support is required
Explanations:
The issue seems to be related to building NPTL on old versions
of glibc (and possibly eglibc as well) on some architectures
(seen on powerpc, s390, s390x and x86_64).
Status:
CURRENT
Fix:
None so far. It would require some glibc hacking.
Workaround:
Try setting "Force unwind support" in the "C-library" menu.
--------------------------------