crosstool-ng/packages/gdb/11.2/0002-allow-android.patch
Alexey Neyman 86c2982568 Run patches thru manage-packages -P
This refreshes the line numbers, removes any fuzz (which would make any
future forward ports easier) and standardizes the patch/file headers
(which makes them easier to read).

Signed-off-by: Alexey Neyman <stilor@att.net>
2022-02-11 00:47:51 -08:00

46 lines
1.7 KiB
Diff

---
gdbserver/configure | 11 -----------
gdbserver/configure.ac | 11 -----------
2 files changed, 22 deletions(-)
--- a/gdbserver/configure
+++ b/gdbserver/configure
@@ -10052,17 +10052,6 @@
case "${target}" in
- *-android*)
- # Starting with NDK version 9, <elf.h> actually includes definitions
- # of Elf32_auxv_t and Elf64_auxv_t. But sadly, <elf.h> includes
- # <sys/exec_elf.h> which defines some of the ELF types incorrectly,
- # leading to conflicts with the defintions from <linux/elf.h>.
- # This makes it impossible for us to include both <elf.h> and
- # <linux/elf.h>, which means that, in practice, we do not have
- # access to Elf32_auxv_t and Elf64_auxv_t on this platform.
- # Therefore, do not try to auto-detect availability, as it would
- # get it wrong on this platform.
- ;;
*)
ac_fn_c_check_type "$LINENO" "Elf32_auxv_t" "ac_cv_type_Elf32_auxv_t" "#include <elf.h>
--- a/gdbserver/configure.ac
+++ b/gdbserver/configure.ac
@@ -171,17 +171,6 @@
])
case "${target}" in
- *-android*)
- # Starting with NDK version 9, <elf.h> actually includes definitions
- # of Elf32_auxv_t and Elf64_auxv_t. But sadly, <elf.h> includes
- # <sys/exec_elf.h> which defines some of the ELF types incorrectly,
- # leading to conflicts with the defintions from <linux/elf.h>.
- # This makes it impossible for us to include both <elf.h> and
- # <linux/elf.h>, which means that, in practice, we do not have
- # access to Elf32_auxv_t and Elf64_auxv_t on this platform.
- # Therefore, do not try to auto-detect availability, as it would
- # get it wrong on this platform.
- ;;
*)
AC_CHECK_TYPES([Elf32_auxv_t, Elf64_auxv_t], [], [],
#include <elf.h>