crosstool-ng/patches/gcc/4.0.2/pr20815-fix.patch
Yann E. MORIN" 1906cf93f8 Add the full crosstool-NG sources to the new repository of its own.
You might just say: 'Yeah! crosstool-NG's got its own repo!".
Unfortunately, that's because the previous repo got damaged beyond repair and I had no backup.
That means I'm putting backups in place in the afternoon.
That also means we've lost history... :-(
2007-02-24 11:00:05 +00:00

122 lines
3.9 KiB
Diff

Date: 18 May 2005 22:47:59 -0000
Message-ID: <20050518224759.7352.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: dank@kegel.com
References: <20050407215701.20815.dank@kegel.com>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug gcov/profile/20815] -fprofile-use barfs with "coverage mismatch for function '...' while reading counter 'arcs'."
------- Additional Comments From hubicka at ucw dot cz 2005-05-18 22:47 -------
Subject: Re: [Bug gcov/profile/20815] -fprofile-use barfs with "coverage mismatch for function '...' while reading counter 'arcs'."
>
> ------- Additional Comments From hubicka at ucw dot cz 2005-05-18 22:22 -------
> Subject: Re: [Bug gcov/profile/20815] -fprofile-use barfs with "coverage mismatch for function '...' while reading counter 'arcs'."
>
> coverage_checksum_string already knows a bit about ignoring random seed
> produced mess. It looks like this needs to be extended somehow to
> handle namespaces too...
This seems to solve the missmatch. Would it be possible to test it on
bigger testcase and if it works distile a testcase that don't use
file IO so it is more suitable for gcc regtesting?
Index: coverage.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/coverage.c,v
retrieving revision 1.6.2.12.2.12
diff -c -3 -p -r1.6.2.12.2.12 coverage.c
*** gcc-old/gcc/coverage.c 18 May 2005 07:37:31 -0000 1.6.2.12.2.12
--- gcc/gcc/coverage.c 18 May 2005 22:45:36 -0000
*************** coverage_checksum_string (unsigned chksu
*** 471,505 ****
as the checksums are used only for sanity checking. */
for (i = 0; string[i]; i++)
{
if (!strncmp (string + i, "_GLOBAL__", 9))
! for (i = i + 9; string[i]; i++)
! if (string[i]=='_')
! {
! int y;
! unsigned seed;
! int scan;
!
! for (y = 1; y < 9; y++)
! if (!(string[i + y] >= '0' && string[i + y] <= '9')
! && !(string[i + y] >= 'A' && string[i + y] <= 'F'))
! break;
! if (y != 9 || string[i + 9] != '_')
! continue;
! for (y = 10; y < 18; y++)
! if (!(string[i + y] >= '0' && string[i + y] <= '9')
! && !(string[i + y] >= 'A' && string[i + y] <= 'F'))
! break;
! if (y != 18)
! continue;
! scan = sscanf (string + i + 10, "%X", &seed);
! gcc_assert (scan);
! if (seed != crc32_string (0, flag_random_seed))
! continue;
! string = dup = xstrdup (string);
! for (y = 10; y < 18; y++)
! dup[i + y] = '0';
! break;
! }
break;
}
--- 471,511 ----
as the checksums are used only for sanity checking. */
for (i = 0; string[i]; i++)
{
+ int offset = 0;
+ if (!strncmp (string + i, "_GLOBAL__N_", 11))
+ offset = 11;
if (!strncmp (string + i, "_GLOBAL__", 9))
! offset = 9;
!
! /* C++ namespaces do have scheme:
! _GLOBAL__N_<filename>_<wrongmagicnumber>_<magicnumber>functionname
! since filename might contain extra underscores there seems
! to be no better chance then walk all possible offsets looking
! for magicnuber. */
! if (offset)
! for (;string[offset]; offset++)
! for (i = i + offset; string[i]; i++)
! if (string[i]=='_')
! {
! int y;
!
! for (y = 1; y < 9; y++)
! if (!(string[i + y] >= '0' && string[i + y] <= '9')
! && !(string[i + y] >= 'A' && string[i + y] <= 'F'))
! break;
! if (y != 9 || string[i + 9] != '_')
! continue;
! for (y = 10; y < 18; y++)
! if (!(string[i + y] >= '0' && string[i + y] <= '9')
! && !(string[i + y] >= 'A' && string[i + y] <= 'F'))
! break;
! if (y != 18)
! continue;
! if (!dup)
! string = dup = xstrdup (string);
! for (y = 10; y < 18; y++)
! dup[i + y] = '0';
! }
break;
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20815
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.