crosstool-ng/patches/gcc/3.3/sh-spec.patch
Yann E. MORIN" 1906cf93f8 Add the full crosstool-NG sources to the new repository of its own.
You might just say: 'Yeah! crosstool-NG's got its own repo!".
Unfortunately, that's because the previous repo got damaged beyond repair and I had no backup.
That means I'm putting backups in place in the afternoon.
That also means we've lost history... :-(
2007-02-24 11:00:05 +00:00

46 lines
1.6 KiB
Diff

Message-Id: <200308020452.h724q0n01509@r-rr.iij4u.or.jp>
To: dank@kegel.com
Cc: kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp
Subject: Re: Writing PIC version of __udivsi3_i4?
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 01 Aug 2003 21:15:27 -0700"
<3F2B3ADF.6030206@kegel.com>
References: <3F2B3ADF.6030206@kegel.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 13:58:05 +0900
From: kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com> wrote:
> It seems it might be from gcc's spec file:
>
> *subtarget_link_spec:
> %{shared:-shared} %{!static: %{rdynamic:-export-dynamic} %{!dynamic-linker:-dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2} %{!rpath:-rpath /lib}} %{static:-static}
>
> as the only place -rpath showed up was in the output of gcc -v as it
> was linking libc.so.
>
> Well, that's a clue, anyway! Guess I'll dig through the spec files
> tomorrow to see if I can figure it out some more.
I've grepped gcc/config/*/*.h and found only SH and old libc1 stuffs
of i386/alpha include %{!rpath:-rpath ... in 3.3 release and the
current CVS. And my sh-gcc's specs doesn't have this :-(
It would be the Right Thing to remove this stuff simply. How about
the gcc patch below?
Regards,
kaz
--
--- gcc-3.3/gcc/config/sh/linux.h.orig Sat Aug 2 13:20:57 2003
+++ gcc-3.3/gcc/config/sh/linux.h Sat Aug 2 13:22:42 2003
@@ -48,8 +48,7 @@ do { \
"%{shared:-shared} \
%{!static: \
%{rdynamic:-export-dynamic} \
- %{!dynamic-linker:-dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2} \
- %{!rpath:-rpath /lib}} \
+ %{!dynamic-linker:-dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2}} \
%{static:-static}"
/* The GNU C++ standard library requires that these macros be defined. */