With libc_headers step before pass-1, there is no need to distinguish
pass-1 and pass-2; they are configured identically (note that with the
current configuration, core pass-2 is only used for win32 - hence, uses
build_libgcc=yes and mode=static).
Signed-off-by: Alexey Neyman <stilor@att.net>
After 557b9d4, libc_start_files and libc_main steps are performed one
after another. It doesn't make sense, especially since some of the libcs
(glibc, uClibc-ng) go to great lengths to first install start files in
the first step, libc_start_files, only to remove them immediately in the
second step, libc_main.
Current build steps also break in the xtensa newlib configurations, as
it needs to install the custom xtensa headers before building the libgcc
and after 557b9d4, the headers are not installed before libgcc is built
in pass-1.
Therefore, finish what 557b9d4 mentioned but did not do: move header
installation into a new step, libc_headers, and combine libc_start_files
and libc_main into a single step.
This also allows to combine the core pass-1/pass-2 steps, to be done in
a subsequent commit.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Neyman <stilor@att.net>
... and the code dependent on them, after the latest wave of obsolete
package removals. This concludes the glorious history of the original
uClibc (non-NG) with lots of kludges removed.
There was a choice here, whether to call the resulting libc "uClibc" or
"uClibc-ng". I opted in favor of giving uClibc-ng the recognition it
deserves, although it had some ripple effect in the ct-ng code.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Neyman <stilor@att.net>
