Both core pass-1 and -2 compilers are unconditionally built,
so we no longer require a condition variable.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Up until now, all conditions requiring a core pass-1 was when the
threading implementation used was NPTL. So we only built the core
pass-1 when NPTL was used.
Now, things have changed (what? when? Dunno...), and some bare-metal
canadian toolchains fail to build if a core pass-1 is not present.
OTOH, a core pass-1, although not needed for non-NPTL builds, does
no harm at all if it is present.
So, unconditionally build a core pass-1 (but still pass conditional
options to the core backend).
Reported-by: Per Arnold Blaasmo <Per-Arnold.Blaasmo@atmel.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Because we now patch configure.in and configure, the Makefile quicks
in a re-build rule as the source files are now more recent than the
bundled generated files, and that fails because the m4 directory
is missing, although on some systems where aclocal is not installed,
the re-build rule does nothing (except a warning).
Always create tht directory.
Reported-by: Per Arnold Blaasmo <per-arnold.blaasmo@atmel.com>
[Also thanks to Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com>
for some digging works on this issue]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Since we use defconfigs to save the samples, listing all the
samples can no longer be done by passing all the sample names
at one to the script; we need to pass them one-by-one after
we expand the sample's defconfig ibnto a complete .config.
Reported-by: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
gdbserver >= 7.2 comes with an optional library to use tracepoints, the
In Process Agent (IPA) library, libinproctrace.so.
Currently, we build gdbserver staticaly, but that breaks the build of
the IPA lib.
Add an option to biuld the IPA lib, but not if statically linking.
Reported-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Now that we are using defconfig files, the samples do not contain
the full configuration, so we can not simply parse them to show
their content.
Instead, we must fake recalling a sample, and parse the generated
.config file.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
When saving a sample, use savedefconfig instead of copying
the full .config file.
This reduces the saved .config, and reduces clutter when it
is later upgraded.
Also use defconfig when retrieving a sample.
Reported-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
POSIX 1003.1-2008 does not say whether "set -e" should catch a sub-shell
that exits with !0 (it has a list of conditions to catch, but no list of
conditions not to catch, and this situation is not listed).
bash-3 does not catch such a failure, but bash-4 does. That why, on my
Squeeze system I did not see the issue, while Thomas did on is Lenny chroot.
Reported-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
During application development it is desirable to enable malloc
debugging and LD_DEBUG support, but the extensive debug spew from
SUPPORT_LD_DEBUG_EARLY is only useful when working on
uClibc's ld.so.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Autoconf can determine that the correct install command includes flags,
e.g., "/usr/bin/install -c". When using this as a command, we can't
enclose the value in double-quotes, as that makes some shells use the
whole expression as a filename:
# this is the value returned by autoconf and stored in CT_install
$ ins="/usr/bin/install -c"
# if we call it with quotes, the command is not found
$ "${ins}"
bash: /usr/bin/install -c: No such file or directory
# removing the quotes lets it work as expected
$ ${ins}
/usr/bin/install: missing file operand
Try `/usr/bin/install --help' for more information.
Signed-Off-By: Anthony Foiani <anthony.foiani@gmail.com>
When updating a sample configuration with a comment, a dot '.'
in the new comment keeps the previous comment.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Currently, we rely on an existing external cross-compiler targetting
the target, to build the C library.
This can pause quite a few problems if that compiler is different from
the one we are building, because it could introduce some ABI issues.
This patch removes this dependency, by building the core compilers
as we do for standard cross, and also by building the binutils and
gcc, for running on the build machine.
This means we no longer need to offer the cross-sompiler selection in
the menuconfig.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Bizarrely enough, the core gcc are not enough to be able to build a
canadian cross, and a real, full cross compiler is required so that
the canadian cross can be properly built... WTF?!? Sigh...
Add a build-frontend, as was done for the binutils and the complibs.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Do for the final step the same as for the core step: compute the list
of selected langauages from the frontend, not in the backend.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
As the core backend can be used to also build the bare-metal compiler,
we have to tel it what languages to build.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Add a function that prepares the language configure option.
It is needed in at least two places, some commonalisation is needed. ;-)
Unfortunately, it is no longer possible to print warnings about experimental
languages any more. Anyway, the experimental status is clearly indicated
in the menuconfig. so it should not be a surprise if the build breaks. :-/
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
It's easier to have as much as possible stuff in the same place to
ease backup/restore, and make things easier to follow.
Move the host companion libraries install dir as a sub-dir of the
build-tools install dir (but not directly in it, it would break
for canadian or cross-native).
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
A few noop fix-ups:
- fix the comments in core pass-1
- commonalise settings that can be
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
In canadian-cross, we need the companion libraries running on the
build machine, to be able to build the two core gcc.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
In canadian-cross, we need binutils running on the build machine to be
able to build the target C library.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Move the actual complibs codes to backend functions that builds the
required combo of build/host/target as requested by a frontend.
This split is currently a no-op, but is required for the upcoming
canadian-cross rework, where we'll be needing to build the complibs
twice, one for build/build, and one for build/host.
This applies to the six companion libraries:
- GMP
- MPFR
- PPL
- Cloog/PPL
- MPC
- libelf
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Move the actual binutils code to a backend function that builds the
required combo of build/host/target as requested by a frontend.
This split is currently a no-op, but is required for the upcoming
canadian-cross rework, where we'll be needing to build two binutils,
one for build/build/target, and one for build/host/target.
This applies to the three binutils:
- GNU binutils
- elf2flt
- sstrip
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
The core compilers are used to build the C library, so they
should always run on the build machine, not on the host.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
There really is no good reason to install the core compilers in their
own places, one for each pass. We can install them with the other
build tools.
Also, this implies that:
- there are fewer directories to save/restore
- there are fewer symlinks to create for binutils
- the PATH is shorter
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
When building a canadian-cross, the binutils are not executable on
the build machine, so there is no point in installing the symlinks
in the gcc static/shared install dirs.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
strace upstream location has slightly changed.
Reported-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Since anciens.enib.fr has been dead for two months now, without any
hope of recovery, update my e-mail to point to @free.fr instead.
Reported-by: "Bryan Hundven" <bryanhundven@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
The build dir are created depending on the host (host for that specific
backend, not host for the toolchain). Only the frontends know what host
this is, so only the frontends can create non-ambiguous dirs.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
A lot of places are currently doing:
mkdir -p foo/bar
cd foo/bar
Or even:
mkdir -p foo/bar
pushd foo/bar
[...]
popd
Provide both wrapper to ease doing this.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
The only user of the static core compiler in pass-1 was the newlib
C library. Now that it is build in a later step, we do no longer
need to build a static core compiler in pass-1.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Currently, newlib is built in the start_file step, which is wrong, but was
needed when the baremetal integration was... well, 'unfinished'.
Now that we build the baremetal compiler from the final cc step, and a
proper core gcc in pass-1 and pass-2, we can move the newlib build to the
step do_libc, where it belongs.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
In case we build a baremetal compiler, use the standard passes:
- core_cc is used to build the C library;
- as such, it is meant to run on build, not host;
- the final compiler is meant to run on host;
As the current final compiler step can not build a baremetal compiler,
call the core backend from the final step.
NB: Currently, newlib is built during the start_files pass, so we have
to have a core compiler by then... Once we can build the baremetal
compiler from the final cc step, then we can move the newlib build to
the proper step, and then get rid of the core pass-1 static compiler...
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Currently, we issue the bare-metal compiler from the pass_1 & pass_2
core compilers, because the final gcc breaks while doing so.
This implies we have to build some libces during the start_files step,
instead of the standard libc step. This is the case for newlib.
By adding a backend/frontend infra to the final gcc, we can abstract
what backend to call: the standard backend for non-bare-metal gcc,
and the core backend for bare-metal.
This patch is just an no-op, it just adds the final backend and
frontend without changing the way bare-metal is built, to come in a
subsequent patch.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
As the core backend is used to generate the bare-metal compiler,
we need to pass it the host CFLAGS.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Tell the core compiler what host it should run on (instead of
hard-coding runing on CT_HOST).
No functional change so far, switching between CT_HOST and CT_BUILD
will come in a following patch.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Currently, the discrimination on the core compilers prefixes depends on
the type of core compiler to build.
This is not correct, and the caller of the core backend should specify
the prefix.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
