By default, recent versions of glibc and eglibc will build some
functions that take format strings (eg. printf, syslog...) with
run-time checks against some format string attacks. This is
called a fortified build.
Unfortunately, this fails somehow while building the instrumented
version of syslog, with some kind of circular dependency...
Disable fortified builds by default, and hide the enabling option
behind EXPERIMENTAL for daring users...
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
As companion tools might or might not be used to build each
toolchain, they do belong to that toolchain's build tools,
not to the generic override tools.
Fix a typo in the autoconf URL.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
The gcc used by linaro has a version number specific to Linaro, but
identifies itself with its upstream version numbering scheme.
This breaks the strip in the finish step, because the actual gcc version
is not the same as the configured one (eg. 4.5.2 vs. linaro-4.5-2011.02-0).
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
We make it an option, as not all combinations of architectures
vs. compiler vs. glibc/eglibc exhibit the issue. Mostly visible
on old glibc versions, it seems...
This is a missing part from the glibc/eglibc merger... :-/
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Enabling plugins in binutils is not enough, and gcc also
needs to be ./configured with --enable-plugins, although
this is not documented anywhere... :-/
Reported-by: karthik duraisami <kdconstant@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Since the advent of make-3.82, some packages now break due to changes
in make-3.82, being stricter than 3.81 when interpreting the Makefiles.
This has bugged us a bit too much so far, and I believe fixing all
of them is a long road, while simply building make-3.81 is the easiest
route for now.
Of course, in the long term, packages will get fixed upstream, and we
should back-port the fixes to old versions, and get rid of building
make-3.81. In the meantime...
Reported several times on the mailing list.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Under mingw, it seems that there is a mix between the traditional /usr
directory, and a similar-purposed /mingw directory (both in the sysroot).
Currently, we create /mingw as a symlink to /usr, and we removed it in
the libc-finish step.
Unfortunately, this prevents the pre-processor to find the headers.
Keeping the symlink makes it magically work...
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Depending on local policies, some users have expressed a need to
have the sysroot be named differently than the hard-coded name.
Add an option for that.
Default to 'sysroot' to match the existing literature.
While at it, replace 'sys-root' with 'sysroot' everywhere we
reference the sysroot.
Reported-by: Alexey Kuznetsov <Alexey.KUZNETSOV@youtransactor.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Final step at sharing code between glibc and eglibc.
Fall, wall of shame, fall!... :-)
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
The reunification of the glibc/eglibc code paths exposed a nasty
bug in the glibc build: use of PARALLELMFLAGS breaks the build.
See the explanations in that bug report against FC6:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multiple&id=212111
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
glibc and eglibc each have two very similar ways of building this list.
This can, and should definitetly, be shared.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
It will be possible to use that also with eglibc, so this hunk belongs to
the common code.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Use the common procedure, shared between glibc and eglibc. This requires
that glibc-specific bits be included in the shared procedure.
But still build the full libc with the glibc-specific procedure. This will
be commonalised in a future commit.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
The build procedure for eglibc is generic enough to
be shared between glibc and eglibc. This includes:
- headers install (empty!)
- start files build
- complete libc build
- libc finish (empty!)
- add-ons list
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
It is unnecessary to split C library preparation into two steps, as only
one really makes sense. So, do_libc_headers is bound to be withdrawn
short-term, in favor of do_libc_start_files.
mingw already had all its start files installation in do_libc_headers, and
do_libc_start_files was empty, just migrate the content of the former into
the latter.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
It is unnecessary to split C library preparation into two steps, as only
one really makes sense. So, do_libc_headers is bound to be withdrawn
short-term, in favor of do_libc_start_files.
uClibc already had all its start files installation in do_libc_headers, and
do_libc_start_files was empty, just migrate the content of the former into
the latter.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
This is an obsolete version which is no longer used by any sample (the only
user, the ia64 sample, has been removed).
It also makes the code path a bit complex, with twists just to accomodate
that version. Removing the version will make those twists go away, and
will ease commonalisation of glibc and eglibc in the future (hopefully!).
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
ia64 is broken in every gcc/glibc combinations I tested (except for the
existing sample that used very old versions).
Nobody complained on the list about not being able to build recent versions.
So the only way forward I can see is to remove the architecture altogether.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
The location of the longterm Linux kernels on FTP has changed.
Here is a simple (but not very versatile) fix.
Signed-off-by: "Björn A. Herwig" <herwig@gdsys.de>
[yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr: make it generic/versatile]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Latest version of CLooG does not have properly generated autoconf files,
so they need to be regenerated before the call to ./configure
Signed-off-by: "Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh" <ilya@total-knowlege.com>
[yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr: make it conditional on 0.15.10 only]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
ltrace 0.5.3 currently fails to build for target mips because MY_TARGET
(introduced by patches/ltrace/0.5.3/150-allow-configurable-arch.patch)
is set to 'mips' via CT_ARCH, while the mips specific stuff in ltrace
(0.5.3) is stored under sysdeps/linux-gnu/mipsel:
result: *** No rule to make target `mips/arch.h', needed by `sysdep.h'.
Stop.
The following patch fixes this issue
Signed-off-by: "Horst Kronstorfer" <horst.kronstorfer@aon.at>
[yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr: reformat commit log]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
To properly enable LTO with gold, gcc has to install a plugin that gold
uses to handle the LTO information.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
When both gold and ld are installed, add a wrapper that calls
to either gold or ld.
In case the wrapper is installed, we also need to symlink ld.bfd
and ld.gold for the core_cc steps.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
When configured with support for threads, gold can link in
parallel, possibly cooperating with a make jobserver.
Add an option enabling threads.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
gold is a new, optimised, multi-threaded linker with support
for plugins.
Add support for gold starting with binutils 2.21. Although 2.20
also had gold, the configure flags have changed, and supporting
2.20 would be a mess in the code.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
libelf is used by gcc to build the lto-plugin used
by binutils' gold to perform LTO.
This requires that files in libelf be compiled with
-fPIC to generate a proper .so.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Hidden version names for uClibc conflicted:
LIBC_UCLIBC_V_0_9_30_2
LIBC_V_0_9_30_1
name them constantly as:
LIBC_UCLIBC_V_<version>
Also update the build script where we use snapshots by version or snapshots by date.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com>
Like rev 2002, eglibc installs some bash scripts, but use the path to the
buildtool bash as the interpreter (on the shebang line). This is only a
symlink to the real bash, and thus is not available at runtime.
Fix that by assuming that shell on the target *will* be /bin/bash.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com>
headers_install makes .install and ..install.cmd files.
headers_check makes .check and ..check.cmd files.
Remove these files uncoditionaly after installing (and checking) header files
into the sys-root.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com>
[Yann E. MORIN: reformat the patch, move hunk out of headers_check conditional]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
It appears, that the configure scripts of libelf versions 0.8.13 and
0.8.12 do not honour the --host option. The compiler must be given as an
environment variable or the process will use the command "gcc" as the
compiler.
It seems that this is already done in the function do_libelf_target in
scripts/build/companion_libs/libelf.sh, but not in function do_libelf.
Do not try to strip any script.
Previously, only shell scripts were ignored, but when the Java frontend
is installed, it also installs a Python script. So we have to ignore
any "script text executable", and not restrict it to "shell script text
executable".
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Using a list of files to strip misses a few of them.
Now, scan appropriate directories, and strip all ELF
executables and shared objects.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
- add a new parameter to do_cc_core: build_statically=[yes|no]
- pass build_statically=yes in core_pass_2 when doing bare_metal
- fix handling the static / static libstdc++ / static complibs stuff
- add a commment to keep both blocks (in core and final) in sync
Signed-off-by: "Bryan Hundven" <bryanhundven@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
If the global static option is set, then build the final gcc statically.
Signed-off-by: "Bryan Hundven" <bryanhundven@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
If the global static option is set, then build binutils statically.
Signed-off-by: "Bryan Hundven" <bryanhundven@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
This rules out 0.15.5 and previous versions, that did not
have this option, so remove them from the list. Anyway,
they were marked 'OBSOLETE', so it's not a big loss...
[Yann E. MORIN: remove obsolete versions]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
The version string was hard-coded.
Now, the version string follows the crosstool-NG version.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
