Refactor the contents of 'do_libc_start_files()' and 'do_libc()' into a
parameterized 'do_libc_backend()'. 'do_libc_start_files()' and 'do_libc()'
call 'do_libc_backend()' with either 'libc_mode=startfiles' or
'libc_mode=final' (respectively) so that the startfiles/headers and
the final libc builds are configured and built with the same options.
One example of where this is needed is when building a mips toolchain.
Previously, if you were building an n32 toolchain, you wouldn't have
noticed an issue, because if '-mabi' is not in CFLAGS, n32 is the
default:
http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc-ports.git;a=blob;f=sysdeps/mips/preconfigure;hb=HEAD
But when trying to build an o32 or n64 toolchain the build would
have failed. This is because (e)glibc expects "-mabi={o32,n32,n64}" to be
in CFLAGS, but was not previously provided in 'do_libc_start_files()'.
The build failure would happen in the shared-core gcc when it tries to
configure an n64 or o32 gcc with an n32 libc.
A simpler solution would have been to just add TARGET_CFLAGS to configure
in 'do_libc_start_files()', but this way makes configure and make
consistent for both steps.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com>
"crosstool-NG-${CT_VERSION}" is currently the default for TOOLCHAIN_PKGVERSION,
and this options is passed as is to --with-pkgversion.
This patch prepends "crosstool-NG ${CT_VERSION}" to TOOLCHAIN_PKGVERSION before
passing it to --with-pkgversion.
Signed-off-by: "Benoît THÉBAUDEAU" <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
Some addons are bundled with glibc/eglibc, so we should not try to
download and extract them.
This is done as thus:
- at download time:
- if the add-on download fails, keep going;
- at extract time:
- if the addon is present in the source tree, ignore it;
- if the addon is missing in the source tree:
- if the archive is present, extract it;
- if the archive is missing, bail out.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
This patch makes eglibc benefit from the TOOLCHAIN_PKGVERSION and
TOOLCHAIN_BUGURL options.
Signed-off-by: "Benoît THÉBAUDEAU" <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
glibc and eglibc have a very similar extraction process, so it
makes sense to commonalise it.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Make it explicit that a variable is an array bu the name of the variable.
It will be used later when .config gets munged to allow both multiple
arguments and arguments with spaces at the same time to be passed from the
configuration down to the build scripts.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Building the start files requires a shared-capable compiler, which we do
not have when the threading implementation is LinuxThreads.
So, only build the start files when the threading implementations is NPTL.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
By default, recent versions of glibc and eglibc will build some
functions that take format strings (eg. printf, syslog...) with
run-time checks against some format string attacks. This is
called a fortified build.
Unfortunately, this fails somehow while building the instrumented
version of syslog, with some kind of circular dependency...
Disable fortified builds by default, and hide the enabling option
behind EXPERIMENTAL for daring users...
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
We make it an option, as not all combinations of architectures
vs. compiler vs. glibc/eglibc exhibit the issue. Mostly visible
on old glibc versions, it seems...
This is a missing part from the glibc/eglibc merger... :-/
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Depending on local policies, some users have expressed a need to
have the sysroot be named differently than the hard-coded name.
Add an option for that.
Default to 'sysroot' to match the existing literature.
While at it, replace 'sys-root' with 'sysroot' everywhere we
reference the sysroot.
Reported-by: Alexey Kuznetsov <Alexey.KUZNETSOV@youtransactor.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Final step at sharing code between glibc and eglibc.
Fall, wall of shame, fall!... :-)
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
glibc and eglibc each have two very similar ways of building this list.
This can, and should definitetly, be shared.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
It will be possible to use that also with eglibc, so this hunk belongs to
the common code.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Use the common procedure, shared between glibc and eglibc. This requires
that glibc-specific bits be included in the shared procedure.
But still build the full libc with the glibc-specific procedure. This will
be commonalised in a future commit.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
The build procedure for eglibc is generic enough to
be shared between glibc and eglibc. This includes:
- headers install (empty!)
- start files build
- complete libc build
- libc finish (empty!)
- add-ons list
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
