Plugins are shared objects, and when building a toolchain statically,
the gcc build system breaks havok (although there is no hard technical
reasons it should not be possible)...
And consequently, do not enable plugin supoprt in binutils.
Reported-by: Thomas Spurden <thomas@ado.is-a-geek.net>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
In fact, it is only supported in a few legacy versions.
Keep LT available for all eglibc versions, although it might need
a similar safeguard...
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Building the start files requires a shared-capable compiler, which we do
not have when the threading implementation is LinuxThreads.
So, only build the start files when the threading implementations is NPTL.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
By default, recent versions of glibc and eglibc will build some
functions that take format strings (eg. printf, syslog...) with
run-time checks against some format string attacks. This is
called a fortified build.
Unfortunately, this fails somehow while building the instrumented
version of syslog, with some kind of circular dependency...
Disable fortified builds by default, and hide the enabling option
behind EXPERIMENTAL for daring users...
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
As companion tools might or might not be used to build each
toolchain, they do belong to that toolchain's build tools,
not to the generic override tools.
Fix a typo in the autoconf URL.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Consider the buildtools install directory as a prefix directory,
that is, install buildtools in prefix/bin/, not in prefix/.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
There is absolutely *no* reason for the buildtools (wrappers to gcc, g++,
as, ld... for the local machine) to be in the toolchain directory. Moreover,
they are removed after the build completes.
Move them out of the toolchain directory, and into the build directory (but
yet the part specific to the current toolchain). This means we no longer
need to explicitly remove them either, BTW, but we need to save/restore them
for the restart feature.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Currently, the buildtools are installed relative to ${CT_PREFIX_DIR}.
Change that by introducing ${CT_BUILDTOOLS_DIR}, which is
still set relative to ${CT_PREFIX_DIR}, but which will make it easy
to change in the future.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
If we set PATH to the tools wrappers before we create the
makeinfo wrapper, then we may well wrap an existing wrapper
from a previous run.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
The kernel headers are only needed just before we build
the C library headers, and need not be present before.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
The gcc used by linaro has a version number specific to Linaro, but
identifies itself with its upstream version numbering scheme.
This breaks the strip in the finish step, because the actual gcc version
is not the same as the configured one (eg. 4.5.2 vs. linaro-4.5-2011.02-0).
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
I haven't noticed the usual experimental testers complain about eglibc
2.11 or 2.12 being unstable. So stop marking them as experimental.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com>
Release time is coming at a fast pace. It is now time to
update the samples so they apply cleanly.
The canadian-cross sample mingw32,i686-none-linux-gnu has
been replaced with i586-mingw32msvc,i686-none-linux-gnu.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
We make it an option, as not all combinations of architectures
vs. compiler vs. glibc/eglibc exhibit the issue. Mostly visible
on old glibc versions, it seems...
This is a missing part from the glibc/eglibc merger... :-/
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Enabling plugins in binutils is not enough, and gcc also
needs to be ./configured with --enable-plugins, although
this is not documented anywhere... :-/
Reported-by: karthik duraisami <kdconstant@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Since the advent of make-3.82, some packages now break due to changes
in make-3.82, being stricter than 3.81 when interpreting the Makefiles.
This has bugged us a bit too much so far, and I believe fixing all
of them is a long road, while simply building make-3.81 is the easiest
route for now.
Of course, in the long term, packages will get fixed upstream, and we
should back-port the fixes to old versions, and get rid of building
make-3.81. In the meantime...
Reported several times on the mailing list.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
In certain circumstances, removing the destination/installation directory
is a bad idea. For example, when the build environment is already taking
care of sanitising the build tree, and pre-installs stuff in there, it is
a very bad idea to remove the destination directory.
This happens now in buildroot, as the crostool-NG backend now installs the
toolchain in the common host-tools directory, and pre-install there a few
host-utilities (eg. host-automake and host-gawk).
Provide a config knob to turn on/off the removal of the destination
directory, defaulting to 'y' (previous behavior), and forced to 'n' when
used as a backend.
Reported-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Under mingw, it seems that there is a mix between the traditional /usr
directory, and a similar-purposed /mingw directory (both in the sysroot).
Currently, we create /mingw as a symlink to /usr, and we removed it in
the libc-finish step.
Unfortunately, this prevents the pre-processor to find the headers.
Keeping the symlink makes it magically work...
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Use of the sysroot is highly recommended, and the non-sysroot case is
both obsolete and not widely tested.
Before the non-sysroot case can go away, deprecate it.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Computed paths may contain double slashes.
This is not an issue but it is just ugly to look at.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Depending on local policies, some users have expressed a need to
have the sysroot be named differently than the hard-coded name.
Add an option for that.
Default to 'sysroot' to match the existing literature.
While at it, replace 'sys-root' with 'sysroot' everywhere we
reference the sysroot.
Reported-by: Alexey Kuznetsov <Alexey.KUZNETSOV@youtransactor.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Final step at sharing code between glibc and eglibc.
Fall, wall of shame, fall!... :-)
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
The reunification of the glibc/eglibc code paths exposed a nasty
bug in the glibc build: use of PARALLELMFLAGS breaks the build.
See the explanations in that bug report against FC6:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multiple&id=212111
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
glibc and eglibc each have two very similar ways of building this list.
This can, and should definitetly, be shared.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
It will be possible to use that also with eglibc, so this hunk belongs to
the common code.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Use the common procedure, shared between glibc and eglibc. This requires
that glibc-specific bits be included in the shared procedure.
But still build the full libc with the glibc-specific procedure. This will
be commonalised in a future commit.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
The build procedure for eglibc is generic enough to
be shared between glibc and eglibc. This includes:
- headers install (empty!)
- start files build
- complete libc build
- libc finish (empty!)
- add-ons list
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
It is unnecessary to split C library preparation into two steps, as only
one really makes sense. So, do_libc_headers is bound to be withdrawn
short-term, in favor of do_libc_start_files.
mingw already had all its start files installation in do_libc_headers, and
do_libc_start_files was empty, just migrate the content of the former into
the latter.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
