Modify CT_TARGET_CFLAGS (which are passed to GCC's FOR_TARGET flags) rather
than CT_ALL_TARGET_CFLAGS.
Fixes#1006.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Neyman <stilor@att.net>
This sample works well for building the open-source first stage
bootloader for the SiFive U540 device (and similar):
https://github.com/sifive/freedom-u540-c000-bootloader
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
This sample works well for the SiFive U540 device (and similar).
Thanks to Jim Wilson <jimw@sifive.com> for his review, discovering
several bugs (now fixed).
Cc: Jim Wilson <jimw@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Add initial rv64 support. Originally based on suggestions from
Franz Flasch <franz.flasch@gmx.at>.
Cc: Franz Flasch <franz.flasch@gmx.at>
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Commit 1c199f2878f6 ("kbuild: document recursive dependency limitation
/ resolution") probably intended to show a hint along with "recursive
dependency detected!" error, but it missed to add {...} guard, and the
hint is displayed in every loop of the dep_stack traverse, annoyingly.
This error was detected by GCC's -Wmisleading-indentation when switching
to build-time generation of lexer/parser.
scripts/kconfig/symbol.c: In function ‘sym_check_print_recursive’:
scripts/kconfig/symbol.c:1150:3: warning: this ‘if’ clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
if (stack->sym == last_sym)
^~
scripts/kconfig/symbol.c:1153:4: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the ‘if’
fprintf(stderr, "For a resolution refer to Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt\n");
^~~~~~~
I could simply add {...} to surround the three fprintf(), but I rather
chose to move the hint after the loop to make the whole message readable.
Fixes: 1c199f2878f6 ("kbuild: document recursive dependency limitation / resolution"
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>
[upstream commit e3b03bf29d6b99fab7001fb20c33fe54928c157a]
Fixes#1000
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com>
gcc-8.1 for xtensa miscompiles uClibc dynamic linker due to gcc PR
target/65416. The build completes successfully, but the binary is
non-functional because the following fragment in the _dl_get_ready_to_run
in ld-uClibc.so overwrites register spill area on stack causing register
corruption in the previous call frame and a subsequent crash:
419f: f0c1b2 addi a11, a1, -16
41a2: 1ba9 s32i.n a10, a11, 4
41a4: 0bc9 s32i.n a12, a11, 0
41a6: 5127f2 l32i a15, a7, 0x144
41a9: 1765b2 s32i a11, a5, 92
41ac: 4e2782 l32i a8, a7, 0x138
41af: 146af2 s32i a15, a10, 80
41b2: 001b10 movsp a1, a11
The crash terminates the init process and causes kernel panic.
The fix prevents reordering of movsp opcode and any access to the stack
frame memory and is applicable to all existing gcc versions.
Signed-off-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
They're written in ARM dialect, and `ldmia r14, {r14, pc}` is not accepted in T2
encoding. GCC8 changed the list of multilibs for arm-*, which now includes a
variant with CPU that supports T2 but not A1 encoding.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Neyman <stilor@att.net>
There's no point in keeping samples which are in its essense
just a sub-set of multilib toolchain.
But still we'd like to cover quite unusual but really existing
case - ARC750, i.e. ARC700 with MMU but without so-called
atomic instructions (LLOCK/SCOND). To support this HW variation
we need:
1) Compile all target binaries without "-matomics" or even
better "-mno-atomics" so that's even future-proof
(as we may decide to enable "-matomics" by default for Linux
targets which is a recommented setup).
2) Configure libc such that it uses Linux-kernel-assisted implementation
of atomic operation via "arc_usr_cmpxchg" syscall,
see https://cgit.uclibc-ng.org/cgi/cgit/uclibc-ng.git/commit/?id=b985fa069187e4c5a7ee84213d9fbead2f219ce5
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
In case we build for ARC core which has no support of atomic ops among
other things we need to configure libc to use Linux kernel helper to emulate
HS atomic ops. This is done with disabling of CONFIG_ARC_HAS_ATOMICS in uClibc.
Currently we __remove__ this option from .config but this makes no sense as
its default state is "y" so we need to explicitly disable it instead.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
We never bothered to build multilibbed Linux toolchains for ARC
and so we ended-up with no support of multilib for arc*-*-linux-*
targets in GCC. That is now fixed in upstream by the following commit:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=0eacfbcb2bf1834294f468a2bb41fe5d5e8d3883
Once the fix mentioned above is applied on top of GCC 8.1.0 we may easily build
multilibbed uClibc toolchain for ARC.
Note sice Glibc port for ARC is still in review process we cannot build any Glibc
toolchains for ARC with pure upstream components, for that we eiter need Glibc
sources from our Github repo or apply a set of patches on top of Glibc 2.27 - we'll
try to address this later though.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
hs4x and hs4xd were mistakenly mentioned in MULTILIB_OPTION/DIRNAMES
before real support of those CPUs was accepted in upstream.
That breaks multilib toolchains building becase we're trying to compile
for not yet known CPU.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
Without this fix we're getting the following error on attempt to build
Linux kernel:
--------------------------------->8---------------------------------
xfrm4_mode_tunnel.s: Assembler messages:
xfrm4_mode_tunnel.s:188: Error: operand out of range (128 is not between -
128 and 127)
--------------------------------->8---------------------------------
The fix is taken from
d8d716f49c
and it is supposed to be merged in upstream GCC sources soonish.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
