Old options %(newlib_nano_link) for the linker must be passed
otherwise linking may fail. E.g., in case of multilib
configurations a correct emulation mode may be not passed.
Signed-off-by: Yuriy Kolerov <ykolerov@synopsys.com>
When `CT_NEWLIB_NANO_INSTALL_IN_TARGET=y`, the `nano.specs` file
emitted by the newlib-nano build script contains an invalid include
path, resulting in the full `newlib.h` being included instead of the
nano `newlib.h` by the application.
`=/include/newlib-nano` is not a valid path (`=` does not mean anything
and that string is taken as an include path as-is) and GCC ignores this
include path, resulting in application including the `newlib.h` from
`include/` which contains the newlib build configurations for the full
newlib.
This commit modifies the newlib-nano build script to emit a proper
newlib-nano include path relative to the `GCC_EXEC_PREFIX`.
Signed-off-by: Stephanos Ioannidis <root@stephanos.io>
The spec file was missing replacing various libs like libc, libm, etc
with their nano equiv when CT_NEWLIB_NANO_INSTALL_IN_TARGET=y. Update
the nano.spec file that is generated to rename libc, libm, etc if
CT_NEWLIB_NANO_INSTALL_IN_TARGET=y
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@linaro.org>
This commit adds a new config that can be used to specify the target
CXXFLAGS specific to the libstdc++ newlib-nano variant.
By default, this config is set to specify the `-fno-exceptions` option,
which disables C++ exception handling support and greatly reduces the
compiled binary size.
Signed-off-by: Stephanos Ioannidis <root@stephanos.io>
In currently generated top-level "nano.specs" we resolve
paths during toolchain building and then use those pre-defined
full paths once the toolchain got built.
That's OK until the toolchain is used right were it was built,
otherwise paths used in the top-level "nano.specs" become
irrelevant and linker fails to find "nano" libs reverting to
non-"nano" libs in the default location.
See https://github.com/crosstool-ng/crosstool-ng/issues/1491.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
Add an option that will install a copy of newlib-nano lib*.a file in
the target dir but renamed with a nano.a suffix (eg: libc_nano.a) as
some default nano.spec files from newlib expect this setup.
Additionally the newlib-nano version of newlib.h will get copied to
include/newlib-nano/newlib.h.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@linaro.org>
If existing board's .specs are used for linking of a user's application,
then instead of normally used libs like libc.a & libstdc++.a might be
requested their "nano"-suffixed siblings: libc_nano.a, libstdc++_nano etc.
That way:
----------------------------->8---------------------------
%rename link_gcc_c_sequence myboard_link_gcc_c_sequence
*myboard_libc:
%{!specs=nano.specs:-lc} %{specs=nano.specs:-lc_nano}
*link_gcc_c_sequence:
%(myboard_link_gcc_c_sequence) --start-group %G %(myboard_libc) --end-group
----------------------------->8---------------------------
Our companion newlib-nano libs are all built optimized for size, so we'd like
to use them for linking. But given linker will see "-lc_nano -lstdc++_nano"
on its command line non-suffixed libs will be ignored.
To solve it we create those "_nano"-suffixed libraries as simple symlinks to
existing libs..
Fixes https://github.com/crosstool-ng/crosstool-ng/issues/1458.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
This allows building newlib-nano in addition to newlib and picolibc,
allowing users to select between C libraries within the same toolchain.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
