Technically, I don't forbid powerpcle support either, but I'm not sure that
there is any library/compiler support for that at the moment (though the hw
technically makes it possible).
powerpc64le needs glibc 2.19 and gcc 4.9. I haven't looked into the support
tools, but at least gdb 7.5 is too old (7.7.1 definitely has support).
Also make powerpc64 non-experimental. It's practically old at this point.
Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <dev@codyps.com>
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr: use ${target_endian_le} and ${target_bits_64}]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Message-Id: <64bfbbced9dd8f62e0d6.1399801945@gun>
Patchwork-Id: 347775
First, 'SUPPORT' should be spelled 'SUPPORTS'.
Second, 'SUPPORT_XXX' really means 'supports --with-xxx', so rename the
affected options accordingly. Update the affected archs to match the new
namings.
Reported-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
The latest kconfig stuff is more stringent when it comes to validating
the dependency of the symbols. It is no longer possible to have a symbol
depend on itself (such as our construct for arch/cc/libc/... was doing).
Fix our generated-file infrastructure to avoid these situations when the
new kconfig stuff will be merged (in a following changeset).
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
