Technically, I don't forbid powerpcle support either, but I'm not sure that
there is any library/compiler support for that at the moment (though the hw
technically makes it possible).
powerpc64le needs glibc 2.19 and gcc 4.9. I haven't looked into the support
tools, but at least gdb 7.5 is too old (7.7.1 definitely has support).
Also make powerpc64 non-experimental. It's practically old at this point.
Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <dev@codyps.com>
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr: use ${target_endian_le} and ${target_bits_64}]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Message-Id: <64bfbbced9dd8f62e0d6.1399801945@gun>
Patchwork-Id: 347775
For some architectures, it is legit to have an alternate value in the
'architecture' part of the tuple. For example:
armv5te-*
armv7a8-*
Besides, some packages expect the tuple to reflect the arch variant
(eg. openMPI) to detect the variant's capabilities (eg. atomic
primitives).
This patch adds an option for the user to specify a suffix to be added
to the arch-part of the tuple.
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Message-ID: <20130120225822.GS6838@1wt.eu>
Patch-Id: 213994
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr: make it a suffix, not an override]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Changeset #7c288c777455 broke the tuple for uClibc-based
powerpc toolchains, by unconditionally forcing CT_TARGET_SYS
to "gnu".
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
