From ea8b5ddce54699a7b359ace1d6b63ac50246d1e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 09:19:16 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix the uClibc clean-up-O_CLOEXEC-handling patch In the Blackfin case (untested until now), this patch was lacking a leading / at the end of a comment. --- patches/uClibc/0.9.30.2/200-clean-up-O_CLOEXEC-handling.patch | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/patches/uClibc/0.9.30.2/200-clean-up-O_CLOEXEC-handling.patch b/patches/uClibc/0.9.30.2/200-clean-up-O_CLOEXEC-handling.patch index a96707c4..2abfe076 100644 --- a/patches/uClibc/0.9.30.2/200-clean-up-O_CLOEXEC-handling.patch +++ b/patches/uClibc/0.9.30.2/200-clean-up-O_CLOEXEC-handling.patch @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ index 7d0bcf9..aabf94d 100644 # define O_NOFOLLOW 0100000 /* Do not follow links. */ # define O_DIRECT 0200000 /* Direct disk access. */ +# define O_NOATIME 01000000 /* don't set atime */ -+# define O_CLOEXEC 02000000 /* set close_on_exec * ++# define O_CLOEXEC 02000000 /* set close_on_exec */ #endif /* For now Linux has synchronisity options for data and read operations.