mirror of
https://github.com/crosstool-ng/crosstool-ng.git
synced 2025-01-29 23:54:15 +00:00
binutils/binutils: add the patches used by BuildRoot for 2.22
Signed-off-by: "Benoît Thébaudeau" <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
This commit is contained in:
Benoît Thébaudeau"
parent
bcc636057f
commit
25447b10c4
31
patches/binutils/2.22/120-sh-conf.patch
Normal file
31
patches/binutils/2.22/120-sh-conf.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
r10231 | lethal | 2005-05-02 09:58:00 -0400 (Mon, 02 May 2005) | 13 lines
|
||||
|
||||
Likewise, binutils has no idea about any of these new targets either, so we
|
||||
fix that up too.. now we're able to actually build a real toolchain for
|
||||
sh2a_nofpu- and other more ineptly named toolchains (and yes, there are more
|
||||
inept targets than that one, really. Go look, I promise).
|
||||
|
||||
diff -durN binutils-2.22.orig/configure binutils-2.22/configure
|
||||
--- binutils-2.22.orig/configure 2011-08-14 14:28:15.000000000 +0200
|
||||
+++ binutils-2.22/configure 2011-12-14 19:49:40.284777434 +0100
|
||||
@@ -3570,7 +3570,7 @@
|
||||
mips*-*-*)
|
||||
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gprof"
|
||||
;;
|
||||
- sh-*-* | sh64-*-*)
|
||||
+ sh*-*-* | sh64-*-*)
|
||||
case "${target}" in
|
||||
sh*-*-elf)
|
||||
;;
|
||||
diff -durN binutils-2.22.orig/configure.ac binutils-2.22/configure.ac
|
||||
--- binutils-2.22.orig/configure.ac 2011-11-21 12:58:27.000000000 +0100
|
||||
+++ binutils-2.22/configure.ac 2011-12-14 19:49:40.316777436 +0100
|
||||
@@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@
|
||||
mips*-*-*)
|
||||
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gprof"
|
||||
;;
|
||||
- sh-*-* | sh64-*-*)
|
||||
+ sh*-*-* | sh64-*-*)
|
||||
case "${target}" in
|
||||
sh*-*-elf)
|
||||
;;
|
||||
24
patches/binutils/2.22/300-001_ld_makefile_patch.patch
Normal file
24
patches/binutils/2.22/300-001_ld_makefile_patch.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
|
||||
diff -durN binutils-2.22.orig/ld/Makefile.am binutils-2.22/ld/Makefile.am
|
||||
--- binutils-2.22.orig/ld/Makefile.am 2011-07-22 22:22:37.000000000 +0200
|
||||
+++ binutils-2.22/ld/Makefile.am 2011-12-14 19:50:25.760779164 +0100
|
||||
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
|
||||
# We put the scripts in the directory $(scriptdir)/ldscripts.
|
||||
# We can't put the scripts in $(datadir) because the SEARCH_DIR
|
||||
# directives need to be different for native and cross linkers.
|
||||
-scriptdir = $(tooldir)/lib
|
||||
+scriptdir = $(libdir)
|
||||
|
||||
EMUL = @EMUL@
|
||||
EMULATION_OFILES = @EMULATION_OFILES@
|
||||
diff -durN binutils-2.22.orig/ld/Makefile.in binutils-2.22/ld/Makefile.in
|
||||
--- binutils-2.22.orig/ld/Makefile.in 2011-07-22 22:22:37.000000000 +0200
|
||||
+++ binutils-2.22/ld/Makefile.in 2011-12-14 19:50:25.784779163 +0100
|
||||
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@
|
||||
# We put the scripts in the directory $(scriptdir)/ldscripts.
|
||||
# We can't put the scripts in $(datadir) because the SEARCH_DIR
|
||||
# directives need to be different for native and cross linkers.
|
||||
-scriptdir = $(tooldir)/lib
|
||||
+scriptdir = $(libdir)
|
||||
BASEDIR = $(srcdir)/..
|
||||
BFDDIR = $(BASEDIR)/bfd
|
||||
INCDIR = $(BASEDIR)/include
|
||||
21
patches/binutils/2.22/300-012_check_ldrunpath_length.patch
Normal file
21
patches/binutils/2.22/300-012_check_ldrunpath_length.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
||||
diff -durN binutils-2.22.orig/ld/emultempl/elf32.em binutils-2.22/ld/emultempl/elf32.em
|
||||
--- binutils-2.22.orig/ld/emultempl/elf32.em 2011-11-21 10:29:39.000000000 +0100
|
||||
+++ binutils-2.22/ld/emultempl/elf32.em 2011-12-14 19:52:12.880783238 +0100
|
||||
@@ -1273,6 +1273,8 @@
|
||||
&& command_line.rpath == NULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
lib_path = (const char *) getenv ("LD_RUN_PATH");
|
||||
+ if ((lib_path) && (strlen (lib_path) == 0))
|
||||
+ lib_path = NULL;
|
||||
if (gld${EMULATION_NAME}_search_needed (lib_path, &n,
|
||||
force))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
@@ -1500,6 +1502,8 @@
|
||||
rpath = command_line.rpath;
|
||||
if (rpath == NULL)
|
||||
rpath = (const char *) getenv ("LD_RUN_PATH");
|
||||
+ if ((rpath) && (strlen (rpath) == 0))
|
||||
+ rpath = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
for (abfd = link_info.input_bfds; abfd; abfd = abfd->link_next)
|
||||
if (bfd_get_flavour (abfd) == bfd_target_elf_flavour)
|
||||
72
patches/binutils/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch
Normal file
72
patches/binutils/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
|
||||
http://bugs.gentoo.org/392645
|
||||
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13470
|
||||
|
||||
2011-12-03 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
|
||||
|
||||
PR ld/13470
|
||||
* elf32-ppc.c (ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Revert substantive
|
||||
change in 2011-07-01 commit. Comment.
|
||||
* elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Likewise.
|
||||
|
||||
diff -durN binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf32-ppc.c binutils-2.22/bfd/elf32-ppc.c
|
||||
--- binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf32-ppc.c 2011-11-21 10:29:21.000000000 +0100
|
||||
+++ binutils-2.22/bfd/elf32-ppc.c 2011-12-14 19:52:43.308784395 +0100
|
||||
@@ -2987,10 +2987,6 @@
|
||||
edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt;
|
||||
edir->elf.pointer_equality_needed |= eind->elf.pointer_equality_needed;
|
||||
|
||||
- /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. */
|
||||
- if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
|
||||
- return;
|
||||
-
|
||||
if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (edir->dyn_relocs != NULL)
|
||||
@@ -3022,6 +3018,16 @@
|
||||
eind->dyn_relocs = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
+ /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.
|
||||
+ You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over; After all,
|
||||
+ both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just
|
||||
+ moving reloc accounting around. However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS
|
||||
+ code in ppc_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for
|
||||
+ dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the
|
||||
+ DIR sym here. */
|
||||
+ if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
|
||||
+ return;
|
||||
+
|
||||
/* Copy over the GOT refcount entries that we may have already seen to
|
||||
the symbol which just became indirect. */
|
||||
edir->elf.got.refcount += eind->elf.got.refcount;
|
||||
diff -durN binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf64-ppc.c binutils-2.22/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
|
||||
--- binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf64-ppc.c 2011-11-21 10:29:24.000000000 +0100
|
||||
+++ binutils-2.22/bfd/elf64-ppc.c 2011-12-14 19:52:43.336784395 +0100
|
||||
@@ -4435,10 +4435,6 @@
|
||||
edir->elf.ref_regular_nonweak |= eind->elf.ref_regular_nonweak;
|
||||
edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt;
|
||||
|
||||
- /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. */
|
||||
- if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
|
||||
- return;
|
||||
-
|
||||
/* Copy over any dynamic relocs we may have on the indirect sym. */
|
||||
if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -4471,6 +4467,16 @@
|
||||
eind->dyn_relocs = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
+ /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.
|
||||
+ You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over; After all,
|
||||
+ both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just
|
||||
+ moving reloc accounting around. However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS
|
||||
+ code in ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for
|
||||
+ dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the
|
||||
+ DIR sym here. */
|
||||
+ if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
|
||||
+ return;
|
||||
+
|
||||
/* Copy over got entries that we may have already seen to the
|
||||
symbol which just became indirect. */
|
||||
if (eind->elf.got.glist != NULL)
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user