mirror of
https://github.com/crosstool-ng/crosstool-ng.git
synced 2024-12-19 04:47:52 +00:00
binutils/binutils: simplify gold dependencies
In preparation of adding a new kernel-type, Yann D. came up with a change in semantic on binutils/gold availability. So far, it was architectures' responsibility to declare that they did support binutils/gold or not. It makes much more sense that binutils/gold declares its own availability depending on the current architecture; after all, architectures have no way to know wether gold supports them, while gold does know it. Signed-off-by:Yann Diorcet <diorcet.yann@gmail.com> [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: split up original patch for self-contained changes] Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> Message-Id: <d3d1d51f399e6d2c1163.1353320546@macbook-smorlat.local> Patchwork-Id: 199971
This commit is contained in:
parent
7b7f7e4db2
commit
19fa6609da
@ -115,8 +115,11 @@ config BINUTILS_HAS_HASH_STYLE
|
||||
config BINUTILS_HAS_GOLD
|
||||
bool
|
||||
|
||||
# gold only suports the listed architectures
|
||||
config BINUTILS_GOLD_SUPPORTS_ARCH
|
||||
bool
|
||||
default y if ARCH_arm
|
||||
default y if ARCH_x86
|
||||
|
||||
config BINUTILS_HAS_PLUGINS
|
||||
bool
|
||||
@ -124,13 +127,6 @@ config BINUTILS_HAS_PLUGINS
|
||||
config BINUTILS_HAS_PKGVERSION_BUGURL
|
||||
bool
|
||||
|
||||
# Only these architectures have support in gold
|
||||
config ARCH_arm
|
||||
select BINUTILS_GOLD_SUPPORTS_ARCH
|
||||
|
||||
config ARCH_x86
|
||||
select BINUTILS_GOLD_SUPPORTS_ARCH
|
||||
|
||||
# Force using the BFD linker if needed
|
||||
# This is the case for some C libraries (eg. glibc and
|
||||
# eglibc at least) and affected components can select this
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user