* Replace SandboxedRunnable with Function interface.
Remove DJVM from "Key Concepts" release notes.
Update installation of shell tool.
Fix broken sandbox package names.
Make sure we only resolve each class once when loading.
Also remove some unused default parameter values.
Don't discard "bootstrap" sandbox.* classes because SourceClassLoader may need them.
* Restore DJVM to the "Key Concepts" docs.
* Remove all mention of "whitelisting" from the DJVM CLI.
* Replace SandboxedRunnable with Function interface.
Remove DJVM from "Key Concepts" release notes.
Update installation of shell tool.
Fix broken sandbox package names.
Make sure we only resolve each class once when loading.
Also remove some unused default parameter values.
Don't discard "bootstrap" sandbox.* classes because SourceClassLoader may need them.
* Restore DJVM to the "Key Concepts" docs.
* Remove all mention of "whitelisting" from the DJVM CLI.
* Remove incorrect documentation
* Tidying up
* Another go at clarifying what will work
* Added another line for clarity
* More clarification
* Some more clarification
* Minor change
* Use the attachments classloader to deserialize contract states in migrations
* Added some comments to explain serialisation behaviour and how tests work.
* Add debug log to indicate when attachment classloading has failed.
* Use a servicesForResolution to load states for compatibility with notary changes and contract upgrades
* Add test case to cover notary change transactions
* Address review comments
* Change logging message in MigrationServicesForResolution
* Read the network-parameters file if there is nothing in the database
* Update documentation and provide a warning if there are many states.
With (Contract JARs) rolling upgrades the downgrade rule cannot be effectively check as the platform can't tell the difference between a transaction that's downgrading because of an attack, vs a transaction that's downgrading because Alice has upgraded but Bob hasn't yet. During a rolling upgrade we would expect state versions to fluctuate up and down as data gets read/written by a mix of nodes. With the feature as implemented Alice will upgrade and start trading with Bob. Bob will be able to read and process the states Alice sent him, but the moment he tries to consume such a state he will fail. This will result in cascading flow deaths and a hung business network the moment an upgrade starts.
* Create a new custom migration for populating the state_party table and the relevancy_status column within the vault_states table when migrating from V3 to V4.
* Add a corresponding unit test suite.
* Small refactorings to expose data required by the migration: the isRelevant function in the NodeVaultService, and the node's legal name from the configuration.
