ExternalVendorCode/corda
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/corda/corda.git synced 2024-12-31 10:17:05 +00:00
Code Issues Actions 2 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Correct bad exception reference and various rendering issues

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Tommy Lillehagen 2017-10-06 10:16:40 +01:00
parent 33ba145149
commit d499ee32bb
2 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
docs/source/tutorial-contract.rst
View File

@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ little odd: we have a *requireThat* construct that looks like it's built into th
ordinary function provided by the platform's contract API. Kotlin supports the creation of *domain specific languages* ordinary function provided by the platform's contract API. Kotlin supports the creation of *domain specific languages*
through the intersection of several features of the language, and we use it here to support the natural listing of through the intersection of several features of the language, and we use it here to support the natural listing of
requirements. To see what it compiles down to, look at the Java version. Each ``"string" using (expression)`` statement requirements. To see what it compiles down to, look at the Java version. Each ``"string" using (expression)`` statement
inside a ``requireThat`` turns into an assertion that the given expression is true, with an ``IllegalStateException`` inside a ``requireThat`` turns into an assertion that the given expression is true, with an ``IllegalArgumentException``
being thrown that contains the string if not. It's just another way to write out a regular assertion, but with the being thrown that contains the string if not. It's just another way to write out a regular assertion, but with the
English-language requirement being put front and center. English-language requirement being put front and center.
@ -340,8 +340,8 @@ the owner.
1. We still check there is a CP input state. 1. We still check there is a CP input state.
2. We want to see that the face value of the CP is being moved as a cash claim against some party, that is, the 2. We want to see that the face value of the CP is being moved as a cash claim against some party, that is, the
issuer of the CP is really paying back the face value. issuer of the CP is really paying back the face value.
2. The transaction must be happening after the maturity date. 3. The transaction must be happening after the maturity date.
3. The commercial paper must *not* be propagated by this transaction: it must be deleted, by the group having no 4. The commercial paper must *not* be propagated by this transaction: it must be deleted, by the group having no
output state. This prevents the same CP being considered redeemable multiple times. output state. This prevents the same CP being considered redeemable multiple times.
To calculate how much cash is moving, we use the ``sumCashBy`` utility function. Again, this is an extension function, To calculate how much cash is moving, we use the ``sumCashBy`` utility function. Again, this is an extension function,