mirror of
https://github.com/corda/corda.git
synced 2025-04-06 19:07:08 +00:00
Correct extending flows java docs and add note on overriding responders (#4830)
Add `@InitiatedBy` to the java docs on the responder flow, this is already shown in the kotlin version. Add a note on overriding responders, instructing developers to still include the `@InitiatedBy` annotation on the new responder even though the configuration setup can make developers think that defining the override will guarantee the initiator and responder will join up correctly.
This commit is contained in:
parent
b52fdf0e0f
commit
cd321c9da2
@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ with refactoring into `Base` and `Sub` classes. A simple example is shown below.
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@InitiatedBy(Initiator.class)
|
||||
public class SubResponder extends BaseResponder {
|
||||
public SubResponder(FlowSession counterpartySession) {
|
||||
super(counterpartySession);
|
||||
@ -91,7 +92,7 @@ Corda would detect that both ``BaseResponder`` and ``SubResponder`` are configur
|
||||
Corda will then calculate the hops to ``FlowLogic`` and select the implementation which is furthest distance, ie: the most subclassed implementation.
|
||||
In the above example, ``SubResponder`` would be selected as the default responder for ``Initiator``
|
||||
|
||||
.. note:: The flows do not need to be within the same CordApp, or package, therefore to customise a shared app you obtained from a third party, you'd write your own CorDapp that subclasses the first."
|
||||
.. note:: The flows do not need to be within the same CordApp, or package, therefore to customise a shared app you obtained from a third party, you'd write your own CorDapp that subclasses the first.
|
||||
|
||||
Overriding a flow via node configuration
|
||||
----------------------------------------
|
||||
@ -100,6 +101,8 @@ Whilst the subclassing approach is likely to be useful for most applications, th
|
||||
This would be useful if for example, a specific CordApp user requires such a different responder that subclassing an existing flow
|
||||
would not be a good solution. In this case, it's possible to specify a hardcoded flow via the node configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
.. note:: A new responder written to override an existing responder must still be annotated with ``@InitiatedBy`` referencing the base initiator.
|
||||
|
||||
The configuration section is named ``flowOverrides`` and it accepts an array of ``overrides``
|
||||
|
||||
.. container:: codeset
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user