mirror of
https://github.com/corda/corda.git
synced 2025-02-20 17:33:15 +00:00
Merged in rnicoll-cash-common (pull request #75)
Refactor verification of cash contract
This commit is contained in:
commit
a5b5ceeb9b
@ -93,28 +93,7 @@ class Cash : Contract {
|
||||
"there are no zero sized outputs" by outputs.none { it.amount.pennies == 0L }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
val issueCommand = tx.commands.select<Commands.Issue>().singleOrNull()
|
||||
if (issueCommand != null && outputs.isNotEmpty()) {
|
||||
// If we have an issue command, perform special processing: the group is allowed to have no inputs,
|
||||
// and the output states must have a deposit reference owned by the signer.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Whilst the transaction *may* have no inputs, it can have them, and in this case the outputs must
|
||||
// sum to more than the inputs. An issuance of zero size is not allowed.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Note that this means literally anyone with access to the network can issue cash claims of arbitrary
|
||||
// amounts! It is up to the recipient to decide if the backing party is trustworthy or not, via some
|
||||
// as-yet-unwritten identity service. See ADP-22 for discussion.
|
||||
|
||||
// The grouping ensures that all outputs have the same deposit reference and currency.
|
||||
val inputAmount = inputs.sumCashOrZero(currency)
|
||||
val outputAmount = outputs.sumCash()
|
||||
requireThat {
|
||||
"the issue command has a nonce" by (issueCommand.value.nonce != 0L)
|
||||
"output deposits are owned by a command signer" by (issuer in issueCommand.signingParties)
|
||||
"output values sum to more than the inputs" by (outputAmount > inputAmount)
|
||||
}
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (verifyIssueCommands(inputs, outputs, tx, currency, issuer)) continue
|
||||
|
||||
val inputAmount = inputs.sumCashOrNull() ?: throw IllegalArgumentException("there is at least one cash input for this group")
|
||||
val outputAmount = outputs.sumCashOrZero(currency)
|
||||
@ -130,17 +109,37 @@ class Cash : Contract {
|
||||
(inputAmount == outputAmount + amountExitingLedger)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Now check the digital signatures on the move command. Every input has an owning public key, and we must
|
||||
// see a signature from each of those keys. The actual signatures have been verified against the transaction
|
||||
// data by the platform before execution.
|
||||
val owningPubKeys = inputs.map { it.owner }.toSet()
|
||||
val keysThatSigned = tx.commands.requireSingleCommand<Commands.Move>().signers.toSet()
|
||||
requireThat {
|
||||
"the owning keys are the same as the signing keys" by keysThatSigned.containsAll(owningPubKeys)
|
||||
}
|
||||
verifyMoveCommands<Commands.Move>(inputs, tx)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private fun verifyIssueCommands(inputs: List<State>, outputs: List<State>, tx: TransactionForVerification, currency: Currency, issuer: Party): Boolean {
|
||||
val issueCommand = tx.commands.select<Commands.Issue>().singleOrNull()
|
||||
if (issueCommand == null || outputs.isEmpty()) {
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If we have an issue command, perform special processing: the group is allowed to have no inputs,
|
||||
// and the output states must have a deposit reference owned by the signer.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Whilst the transaction *may* have no inputs, it can have them, and in this case the outputs must
|
||||
// sum to more than the inputs. An issuance of zero size is not allowed.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Note that this means literally anyone with access to the network can issue cash claims of arbitrary
|
||||
// amounts! It is up to the recipient to decide if the backing party is trustworthy or not, via some
|
||||
// as-yet-unwritten identity service. See ADP-22 for discussion.
|
||||
|
||||
// The grouping ensures that all outputs have the same deposit reference and currency.
|
||||
val inputAmount = inputs.sumCashOrZero(currency)
|
||||
val outputAmount = outputs.sumCash()
|
||||
requireThat {
|
||||
"the issue command has a nonce" by (issueCommand.value.nonce != 0L)
|
||||
"output deposits are owned by a command signer" by (issuer in issueCommand.signingParties)
|
||||
"output values sum to more than the inputs" by (outputAmount > inputAmount)
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Puts together an issuance transaction for the specified amount that starts out being owned by the given pubkey.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -81,3 +81,20 @@ fun List<AuthenticatedObject<CommandData>>.getTimestampByName(vararg names: Stri
|
||||
return null
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Simple functionality for verifying a move command. Verifies that each input has a signature from its owning key.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param T the type of the move command
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Throws(IllegalArgumentException::class)
|
||||
// TODO: Can we have a common Move command for all contracts and avoid the reified type parameter here?
|
||||
inline fun <reified T : CommandData> verifyMoveCommands(inputs: List<OwnableState>, tx: TransactionForVerification) {
|
||||
// Now check the digital signatures on the move command. Every input has an owning public key, and we must
|
||||
// see a signature from each of those keys. The actual signatures have been verified against the transaction
|
||||
// data by the platform before execution.
|
||||
val owningPubKeys = inputs.map { it.owner }.toSet()
|
||||
val keysThatSigned = tx.commands.requireSingleCommand<T>().signers.toSet()
|
||||
requireThat {
|
||||
"the owning keys are the same as the signing keys" by keysThatSigned.containsAll(owningPubKeys)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user