ExternalVendorCode/corda
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/corda/corda.git synced 2025-05-29 05:34:22 +00:00
Code Issues Actions 2 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

TWP: Cite DTCC study

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Mike Hearn 2019-07-24 14:27:10 +02:00
parent 1c802daf21
commit 51f1530db3
2 changed files with 10 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
docs/source/whitepaper/Ref.bib
View File

@ -405,4 +405,11 @@ publisher = {USENIX Association},
title = {100 Amazing PayPal Statistics and Facts (2019)}, title = {100 Amazing PayPal Statistics and Facts (2019)},
year = {2019}, year = {2019},
howpublished = {\url{https://expandedramblings.com/index.php/paypal-statistics/}} howpublished = {\url{https://expandedramblings.com/index.php/paypal-statistics/}}
}
@misc{DTCCStudy,
author = {DTCC},
title = {Study on DLT scalability},
year = {2018},
howpublished = {\url{http://www.dtcc.com/news/2018/october/16/dtcc-unveils-groundbreaking-study-on-dlt}}
} }

5
docs/source/whitepaper/corda-technical-whitepaper.tex
View File

@ -1533,7 +1533,8 @@ performance in transactions/second per network rather than per node, but Corda n
Because of this, a group of businesses doing high-throughput traffic between each other won't affect the load on Because of this, a group of businesses doing high-throughput traffic between each other won't affect the load on
other nodes belonging to unrelated businesses. Nodes can handle large numbers of transactions per second. other nodes belonging to unrelated businesses. Nodes can handle large numbers of transactions per second.
As of the time of writing, a node has been demonstrated doing a sustained 800 transactions per second. Very few As of the time of writing, a node has been demonstrated doing a sustained 800 transactions per second and an
independent test has demonstrated a multi-notary network processing over 20,000 transactions per second\cite{DTCCStudy}. Very few
businesses directly generate such large quantities of traffic - all of PayPal does only about 320 transactions per businesses directly generate such large quantities of traffic - all of PayPal does only about 320 transactions per
second on average\cite{PayPalTrafficVolume}, so we believe this is sufficient to enable virtually all business use second on average\cite{PayPalTrafficVolume}, so we believe this is sufficient to enable virtually all business use
cases, especially as one transaction can update many parts of the ledger simultaneously. cases, especially as one transaction can update many parts of the ledger simultaneously.
@ -1998,7 +1999,7 @@ In a system without global broadcast things are very different: the notary clust
directly and there is no mechanism to ensure that everyone sees that the transaction is occurring. Sometimes this directly and there is no mechanism to ensure that everyone sees that the transaction is occurring. Sometimes this
doesn't matter: most transactions are irrelevant for you and having to download them just wastes resources. But doesn't matter: most transactions are irrelevant for you and having to download them just wastes resources. But
occasionally you do wish to become aware that the ledger state has been changed by someone else. A simple example occasionally you do wish to become aware that the ledger state has been changed by someone else. A simple example
is an option contract in which you wish to expire the option unless the counterparty has already exercised it. Them is an option contract in which you wish to expire the option unless the counterparty has already exercised it. Their
exercising the option must not require the seller to sign off on it, as it may be advantageous for the seller to exercising the option must not require the seller to sign off on it, as it may be advantageous for the seller to
refuse if it would cause them to lose money. Whilst the seller would discover if the buyer had exercised the option refuse if it would cause them to lose money. Whilst the seller would discover if the buyer had exercised the option
when they attempted to expire it, due to the notary informing them that their expiry transaction was a double when they attempted to expire it, due to the notary informing them that their expiry transaction was a double