mirror of
https://github.com/corda/corda.git
synced 2024-12-18 20:47:57 +00:00
TWP: Cite DTCC study
This commit is contained in:
parent
1c802daf21
commit
51f1530db3
@ -405,4 +405,11 @@ publisher = {USENIX Association},
|
||||
title = {100 Amazing PayPal Statistics and Facts (2019)},
|
||||
year = {2019},
|
||||
howpublished = {\url{https://expandedramblings.com/index.php/paypal-statistics/}}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@misc{DTCCStudy,
|
||||
author = {DTCC},
|
||||
title = {Study on DLT scalability},
|
||||
year = {2018},
|
||||
howpublished = {\url{http://www.dtcc.com/news/2018/october/16/dtcc-unveils-groundbreaking-study-on-dlt}}
|
||||
}
|
@ -1533,7 +1533,8 @@ performance in transactions/second per network rather than per node, but Corda n
|
||||
|
||||
Because of this, a group of businesses doing high-throughput traffic between each other won't affect the load on
|
||||
other nodes belonging to unrelated businesses. Nodes can handle large numbers of transactions per second.
|
||||
As of the time of writing, a node has been demonstrated doing a sustained 800 transactions per second. Very few
|
||||
As of the time of writing, a node has been demonstrated doing a sustained 800 transactions per second and an
|
||||
independent test has demonstrated a multi-notary network processing over 20,000 transactions per second\cite{DTCCStudy}. Very few
|
||||
businesses directly generate such large quantities of traffic - all of PayPal does only about 320 transactions per
|
||||
second on average\cite{PayPalTrafficVolume}, so we believe this is sufficient to enable virtually all business use
|
||||
cases, especially as one transaction can update many parts of the ledger simultaneously.
|
||||
@ -1998,7 +1999,7 @@ In a system without global broadcast things are very different: the notary clust
|
||||
directly and there is no mechanism to ensure that everyone sees that the transaction is occurring. Sometimes this
|
||||
doesn't matter: most transactions are irrelevant for you and having to download them just wastes resources. But
|
||||
occasionally you do wish to become aware that the ledger state has been changed by someone else. A simple example
|
||||
is an option contract in which you wish to expire the option unless the counterparty has already exercised it. Them
|
||||
is an option contract in which you wish to expire the option unless the counterparty has already exercised it. Their
|
||||
exercising the option must not require the seller to sign off on it, as it may be advantageous for the seller to
|
||||
refuse if it would cause them to lose money. Whilst the seller would discover if the buyer had exercised the option
|
||||
when they attempted to expire it, due to the notary informing them that their expiry transaction was a double
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user