From 2dcc1d525aa1d7dbce05d1322cfc2736bda1198f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joel Dice <joel.dice@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:50:53 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] add note about slower floating point code for 32-bit x86
 bootimage build

---
 readme.txt | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/readme.txt b/readme.txt
index 32209046f7..6bfc750124 100644
--- a/readme.txt
+++ b/readme.txt
@@ -442,7 +442,10 @@ For boot image builds:
    space in the executable than the equivalent class files.  In
    practice, this can make the executable 30-50% larger.  Also, AOT
    compilation does not yet yield significantly faster or smaller code
-   than JIT compilation.
+   than JIT compilation.  Finally, floating point code may be slower
+   on 32-bit x86 since the compiler cannot assume SSE2 support will be
+   available at runtime, and the x87 FPU is not supported except via
+   out-of-line helper functions.
 
 Note you can use ProGuard without using a boot image and vice-versa,
 as desired.