mirror of
https://github.com/corda/corda.git
synced 2024-12-19 04:57:58 +00:00
192 lines
12 KiB
ReStructuredText
192 lines
12 KiB
ReStructuredText
|
.. highlight:: kotlin
|
||
|
.. raw:: html
|
||
|
|
||
|
<script type="text/javascript" src="_static/jquery.js"></script>
|
||
|
<script type="text/javascript" src="_static/codesets.js"></script>
|
||
|
|
||
|
Setting up a dynamic compatibility zone
|
||
|
=======================================
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. contents::
|
||
|
|
||
|
Do you need to create your own dynamic compatibility zone?
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
By *dynamic compatibility zone*, we mean a compatibility zone that relies on a network map server to allow nodes to
|
||
|
join dynamically, instead of requiring each node to be bootstrapped and have the node-infos distributed manually. While
|
||
|
this may sound appealing, think twice before going down this route:
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. If you need to test a CorDapp, it is easier to create a test network using the network bootstrapper tool (see below)
|
||
|
2. If you need to control who uses your CorDapp, it is easier to apply permissioning by creating a business network
|
||
|
(see below)
|
||
|
|
||
|
**Testing.** Creating a production-ready zone isn't necessary for testing as you can use the *network bootstrapper*
|
||
|
tool to create all the certificates, keys, and distribute the needed map files to run many nodes. The bootstrapper can
|
||
|
create a network locally on your desktop/laptop but it also knows how to automate cloud providers via their APIs and
|
||
|
using Docker. In this way you can bring up a simulation of a real Corda network with different nodes on different
|
||
|
machines in the cloud for your own testing. Testing this way has several advantages, most obviously that you avoid
|
||
|
race conditions in your tests caused by nodes/tests starting before all map data has propagated to all nodes.
|
||
|
You can read more about the reasons for the creation of the bootstrapper tool
|
||
|
`in a blog post on the design thinking behind Corda's network map infrastructure <https://medium.com/corda/cordas-new-network-map-infrastructure-8c4c248fd7f3>`__.
|
||
|
|
||
|
**Permissioning.** And creating a zone is also unnecessary for imposing permissioning requirements beyond that of the
|
||
|
base Corda network. You can control who can use your app by creating a *business network*. A business network is what we
|
||
|
call a coalition of nodes that have chosen to run a particular app within a given commercial context. Business networks
|
||
|
aren't represented in the Corda API at this time, partly because the technical side is so simple. You can create one
|
||
|
via a simple three step process:
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. Distribute a list of X.500 names that are members of your business network. You can use the
|
||
|
`reference Business Network Membership Service implementation <https://github.com/corda/corda-solutions/tree/master/bn-apps/memberships-management>`_.
|
||
|
Alternatively, you could do this is by hosting a text file with one name per line on your website at a fixed HTTPS
|
||
|
URL. You could also write a simple request/response flow that serves the list over the Corda protocol itself,
|
||
|
although this requires the business network to have its own node.
|
||
|
2. Write a bit of code that downloads and caches the contents of this file on disk, and which loads it into memory in
|
||
|
the node. A good place to do this is in a class annotated with ``@CordaService``, because this class can expose
|
||
|
a ``Set<Party>`` field representing the membership of your service.
|
||
|
3. In your flows use ``serviceHub.findService`` to get a reference to your ``@CordaService`` class, read the list of
|
||
|
members and at the start of each flow, throw a FlowException if the counterparty isn't in the membership list.
|
||
|
|
||
|
In this way you can impose a centrally controlled ACL that all members will collectively enforce.
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. note:: A production-ready Corda network and a new iteration of the testnet will be available soon.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Why create your own zone?
|
||
|
-------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
The primary reason to create a zone and provide the associated infrastructure is control over *network parameters*. These
|
||
|
are settings that control Corda's operation, and on which all users in a network must agree. Failure to agree would create
|
||
|
the Corda equivalent of a blockchain "hard fork". Parameters control things like the root of identity,
|
||
|
how quickly users should upgrade, how long nodes can be offline before they are evicted from the system and so on.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Creating a zone involves the following steps:
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. Create the zone private keys and certificates. This procedure is conventional and no special knowledge is required:
|
||
|
any self-signed set of certificates can be used. A professional quality zone will probably keep the keys inside a
|
||
|
hardware security module (as the main Corda network and test networks do).
|
||
|
2. Write a network map server.
|
||
|
3. Optionally, create a doorman server.
|
||
|
4. Finally, you would select and generate your network parameter file.
|
||
|
|
||
|
How to create your own compatibility zone
|
||
|
-----------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
Using an existing network map implementation
|
||
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||
|
|
||
|
You can use an existing network map implementation such as the
|
||
|
`Cordite Network Map Service <https://gitlab.com/cordite/network-map-service>`_ to create a dynamic compatibility zone.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Creating your own network map implementation
|
||
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||
|
|
||
|
Writing a network map server
|
||
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||
|
|
||
|
This server implements a simple HTTP based protocol described in the ":doc:`network-map`" page.
|
||
|
The map server is responsible for gathering NodeInfo files from nodes, storing them, and distributing them back to the
|
||
|
nodes in the zone. By doing this it is also responsible for choosing who is in and who is out: having a signed
|
||
|
identity certificate is not enough to be a part of a Corda zone, you also need to be listed in the network map.
|
||
|
It can be thought of as a DNS equivalent. If you want to de-list a user, you would do it here.
|
||
|
|
||
|
It is very likely that your map server won't be entirely standalone, but rather, integrated with whatever your master
|
||
|
user database is.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The network map server also distributes signed network parameter files and controls the rollout schedule for when they
|
||
|
become available for download and opt-in, and when they become enforced. This is again a policy decision you will
|
||
|
probably choose to place some simple UI or workflow tooling around, in particular to enforce restrictions on who can
|
||
|
edit the map or the parameters.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Writing a doorman server
|
||
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||
|
|
||
|
This step is optional because your users can obtain a signed certificate in many different ways. The doorman protocol
|
||
|
is again a very simple HTTP based approach in which a node creates keys and requests a certificate, polling until it
|
||
|
gets back what it expects. However, you could also integrate this process with the rest of your signup process. For example,
|
||
|
by building a tool that's integrated with your payment flow (if payment is required to take part in your zone at all).
|
||
|
Alternatively you may wish to distribute USB smartcard tokens that generate the private key on first use, as is typically
|
||
|
seen in national PKIs. There are many options.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you do choose to make a doorman server, the bulk of the code you write will be workflow related. For instance,
|
||
|
related to keeping track of an applicant as they proceed through approval. You should also impose any naming policies
|
||
|
you have in the doorman process. If names are meant to match identities registered in government databases then that
|
||
|
should be enforced here, alternatively, if names can be self-selected or anonymous, you would only bother with a
|
||
|
deduplication check. Again it will likely be integrated with a master user database.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Corda does not currently provide a doorman or network map service out of the box, partly because when stripped of the
|
||
|
zone specific policy there isn't much to them: just a basic HTTP server that most programmers will have favourite
|
||
|
frameworks for anyway.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The protocol is:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* If $URL = ``https://some.server.com/some/path``
|
||
|
* Node submits a PKCS#10 certificate signing request using HTTP POST to ``$URL/certificate``. It will have a MIME
|
||
|
type of ``application/octet-stream``. The ``Client-Version`` header is set to be "1.0".
|
||
|
* The server returns an opaque string that references this request (let's call it ``$requestid``, or an HTTP error if something went wrong.
|
||
|
* The returned request ID should be persisted to disk, to handle zones where approval may take a long time due to manual
|
||
|
intervention being required.
|
||
|
* The node starts polling ``$URL/$requestid`` using HTTP GET. The poll interval can be controlled by the server returning
|
||
|
a response with a ``Cache-Control`` header.
|
||
|
* If the request is answered with a ``200 OK`` response, the body is expected to be a zip file. Each file is expected to
|
||
|
be a binary X.509 certificate, and the certs are expected to be in order.
|
||
|
* If the request is answered with a ``204 No Content`` response, the node will try again later.
|
||
|
* If the request is answered with a ``403 Not Authorized`` response, the node will treat that as request rejection and give up.
|
||
|
* Other response codes will cause the node to abort with an exception.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Setting zone parameters
|
||
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||
|
|
||
|
Zone parameters are stored in a file containing a Corda AMQP serialised ``SignedDataWithCert<NetworkParameters>``
|
||
|
object. It is easy to create such a file with a small Java or Kotlin program. The ``NetworkParameters`` object is a
|
||
|
simple data holder that could be read from e.g. a config file, or settings from a database. Signing and saving the
|
||
|
resulting file is just a few lines of code. A full example can be found in ``NetworkParametersCopier.kt`` in the source
|
||
|
tree, but a flavour of it looks like this:
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. container:: codeset
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. sourcecode:: java
|
||
|
|
||
|
NetworkParameters networkParameters = new NetworkParameters(
|
||
|
4, // minPlatformVersion
|
||
|
Collections.emptyList(), // the `NotaryInfo`s of all the network's notaries
|
||
|
1024 * 1024 * 20, // maxMessageSize
|
||
|
1024 * 1024 * 15, // maxTransactionSize
|
||
|
Instant.now(), // modifiedTime
|
||
|
2, // epoch
|
||
|
Collections.emptyMap() // whitelisted contract code JARs
|
||
|
);
|
||
|
CertificateAndKeyPair signingCertAndKeyPair = loadNetworkMapCA();
|
||
|
SerializedBytes<SignedDataWithCert<NetworkParameters>> bytes = SerializedBytes.from(netMapCA.sign(networkParameters));
|
||
|
Files.copy(bytes.open(), Paths.get("params-file"));
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. sourcecode:: kotlin
|
||
|
|
||
|
val networkParameters = NetworkParameters(
|
||
|
minimumPlatformVersion = 4,
|
||
|
notaries = listOf(...),
|
||
|
maxMessageSize = 1024 * 1024 * 20 // 20mb, for example.
|
||
|
maxTransactionSize = 1024 * 1024 * 15,
|
||
|
modifiedTime = Instant.now(),
|
||
|
epoch = 2,
|
||
|
... etc ...
|
||
|
)
|
||
|
val signingCertAndKeyPair: CertificateAndKeyPair = loadNetworkMapCA()
|
||
|
val signedParams: SerializedBytes<SignedNetworkParameters> = signingCertAndKeyPair.sign(networkParameters).serialize()
|
||
|
signedParams.open().copyTo(Paths.get("/some/path"))
|
||
|
|
||
|
Each individual parameter is documented in `the JavaDocs/KDocs for the NetworkParameters class
|
||
|
<https://docs.corda.net/api/kotlin/corda/net.corda.core.node/-network-parameters/index.html>`__. The network map
|
||
|
certificate is usually chained off the root certificate, and can be created according to the instructions above. Each
|
||
|
time the zone parameters are changed, the epoch should be incremented. Epochs are essentially version numbers for the
|
||
|
parameters, and they therefore cannot go backwards. Once saved, the new parameters can be served by the network map server.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Selecting parameter values
|
||
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||
|
|
||
|
How to choose the parameters? This is the most complex question facing you as a new zone operator. Some settings may seem
|
||
|
straightforward and others may involve cost/benefit tradeoffs specific to your business. For example, you could choose
|
||
|
to run a validating notary yourself, in which case you would (in the absence of SGX) see all the users' data. Or you could
|
||
|
run a non-validating notary, with BFT fault tolerance, which implies recruiting others to take part in the cluster.
|
||
|
|
||
|
New network parameters will be added over time as Corda evolves. You will need to ensure that when your users upgrade,
|
||
|
all the new network parameters are being served. You can ask for advice on the `corda-dev mailing list <https://groups.io/g/corda-dev>`__.
|