2017-04-19 10:05:27 +00:00
|
|
|
Versioning
|
|
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As the Corda platform evolves and new features are added it becomes important to have a versioning system which allows
|
|
|
|
its users to easily compare versions and know what feature are available to them. Each Corda release uses the standard
|
2018-12-13 14:26:15 +00:00
|
|
|
semantic versioning scheme of ``major.minor``. This is useful when making releases in the public domain but is not
|
2017-04-19 10:05:27 +00:00
|
|
|
friendly for a developer working on the platform. It first has to be parsed and then they have three separate segments on
|
|
|
|
which to determine API differences. The release version is still useful and every MQ message the node sends attaches it
|
|
|
|
to the ``release-version`` header property for debugging purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
2018-12-13 12:15:33 +00:00
|
|
|
Platform version
|
|
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
|
2017-04-19 10:05:27 +00:00
|
|
|
It is much easier to use a single incrementing integer value to represent the API version of the Corda platform, which
|
2018-12-13 12:15:33 +00:00
|
|
|
is called the *platform version*. It is similar to Android's `API Level <https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/manifest/uses-sdk-element.html>`_.
|
2017-04-19 10:05:27 +00:00
|
|
|
It starts at 1 and will increment by exactly 1 for each release which changes any of the publicly exposed APIs in the
|
|
|
|
entire platform. This includes public APIs on the node itself, the RPC system, messaging, serialisation, etc. API backwards
|
2018-12-13 12:15:33 +00:00
|
|
|
compatibility will always be maintained, with the use of deprecation to suggest migration away from old APIs. In very rare
|
|
|
|
situations APIs may have to be changed, for example due to security issues. There is no relationship between the platform version
|
2018-12-13 14:26:15 +00:00
|
|
|
and the release version - a change in the major or minor values may or may not increase the platform version. However
|
2018-12-13 12:15:33 +00:00
|
|
|
we do endeavour to keep them synchronised for now, as a convenience.
|
2017-04-19 10:05:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-12-13 12:15:33 +00:00
|
|
|
The platform version is part of the node's ``NodeInfo`` object, which is available from the ``ServiceHub``. This enables
|
2017-04-19 10:05:27 +00:00
|
|
|
a CorDapp to find out which version it's running on and determine whether a desired feature is available. When a node
|
2018-12-13 12:15:33 +00:00
|
|
|
registers with the network map it will check its own version against the minimum version requirement for the network.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum platform version
|
|
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications can advertise a *minimum platform version* they require. If your app uses new APIs that were added in (for example) Corda 5,
|
|
|
|
you should specify a minimum version of 5. This will ensure the app won't be loaded by older nodes. If you can *optionally* use the new
|
|
|
|
APIs, you can keep the minimum set to a lower number. Attempting to use new APIs on older nodes can cause ``NoSuchMethodError`` exceptions
|
2018-12-13 14:26:15 +00:00
|
|
|
and similar problems, so you'd want to check the node version using ``ServiceHub.myInfo``.
|
2018-12-13 12:15:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target version
|
|
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications can also advertise a *target version*. This is similar to the concept of the same name in Android and iOS.
|
|
|
|
Apps should advertise the highest version of the platform they have been tested against. This allows the node to activate or deactivate
|
|
|
|
backwards compatibility codepaths depending on whether they're necessary or not, as workarounds for apps designed for earlier versions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, consider an app that uses new features introduced in Corda 4, but which has passed regression testing on Corda 5. It will
|
|
|
|
advertise a minimum platform version of 4 and a target version of 5. These numbers are published in the JAR manifest file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If this app is loaded into a Corda 6 node, that node may implement backwards compatibility workarounds for your app that make it slower,
|
|
|
|
less secure, or less featureful. You can opt-in to getting the full benefits of the upgrade by changing your target version to 6. By doing
|
2019-03-28 14:21:59 +00:00
|
|
|
this, you promise that you understood all the changes in Corda 6 and have thoroughly tested your app to prove it works. This testing should
|
|
|
|
include ensuring that the app exhibits the correct behaviour on a node running at the new target version, and that the app functions
|
|
|
|
correctly in a network of nodes running at the same target version.
|
2018-12-13 12:15:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target versioning is one of the mechanisms we have to keep the platform evolving and improving, without being permanently constrained to
|
|
|
|
being bug-for-bug compatible with old versions. When no apps are loaded that target old versions, any emulations of older bugs or problems
|
2019-03-28 14:21:59 +00:00
|
|
|
can be disabled.
|
2018-12-13 12:15:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-12-17 12:25:56 +00:00
|
|
|
Publishing versions in your JAR manifests
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------
|
2018-12-13 12:15:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-12-17 12:25:56 +00:00
|
|
|
A well structured CorDapp should be split into two separate modules:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. A contracts jar, that contains your states and contract logic.
|
|
|
|
2. A workflows jar, that contains your flows, services and other support libraries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reason for this split is that the contract JAR will be attached to transactions and sent around the network, because this code is what
|
|
|
|
defines the data structures and smart contract logic all nodes will validate. If the rest of your app is a part of that same JAR, it'll get
|
|
|
|
sent around the network too even though it's not needed and will never be used. By splitting your app into a contracts JAR and a workflows
|
|
|
|
JAR that depends on the contracts JAR, this problem is avoided.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the ``build.gradle`` file for your contract module, add a block like this::
|
2018-12-13 12:15:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cordapp {
|
2018-12-13 14:26:15 +00:00
|
|
|
targetPlatformVersion 5
|
|
|
|
minimumPlatformVersion 4
|
|
|
|
contract {
|
2018-12-17 12:25:56 +00:00
|
|
|
name "MegaApp Contracts"
|
2018-12-13 12:15:33 +00:00
|
|
|
vendor "MegaCorp"
|
2019-01-16 11:19:37 +00:00
|
|
|
licence "MegaLicence"
|
2018-12-13 14:26:15 +00:00
|
|
|
versionId 1
|
2018-12-13 12:15:33 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-12-13 14:26:15 +00:00
|
|
|
This will put the necessary entries into your JAR manifest to set both platform version numbers. If they aren't specified, both default to 1.
|
|
|
|
Your app can itself has a version number, which should always increment and must also always be an integer.
|
2018-12-13 12:15:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-12-17 12:25:56 +00:00
|
|
|
And in the ``build.gradle`` file for your workflows jar, add a block like this::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cordapp {
|
|
|
|
targetPlatformVersion 5
|
|
|
|
minimumPlatformVersion 4
|
|
|
|
workflow {
|
|
|
|
name "MegaApp"
|
|
|
|
vendor "MegaCorp"
|
2019-01-16 11:19:37 +00:00
|
|
|
licence "MegaLicence"
|
2018-12-17 12:25:56 +00:00
|
|
|
versionId 1
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's entirely expected and reasonable to have an open source contracts module and a proprietary workflow module - the latter may contain
|
|
|
|
sophisticated or proprietary business logic, machine learning models, even user interface code. There's nothing that restricts it to just
|
|
|
|
being Corda flows or services.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-13 11:36:43 +00:00
|
|
|
.. important:: The ``versionId`` specified for the JAR manifest is checked by the platform and is used for informative purposes only.
|
|
|
|
See ":ref:`contract_downgrade_rule_ref`" for more information.
|
2018-12-18 10:14:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-12-13 12:15:33 +00:00
|
|
|
.. note:: You can read the original design doc here: :doc:`design/targetversion/design`.
|