2015-12-14 17:22:21 +00:00
|
|
|
Networking and messaging
|
|
|
|
========================
|
|
|
|
|
2016-08-24 13:38:43 +00:00
|
|
|
Corda uses AMQP/1.0 over TLS between nodes which is currently implemented using Apache Artemis, an embeddable message
|
|
|
|
queue broker. Building on established MQ protocols gives us features like persistence to disk, automatic delivery
|
|
|
|
retries with backoff and dead-letter routing, security, large message streaming and so on.
|
2015-12-14 17:22:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-08-24 13:38:43 +00:00
|
|
|
Artemis is hidden behind a thin interface that also has an in-memory only implementation suitable for use in
|
|
|
|
unit tests and visualisation tools.
|
2015-12-14 17:22:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-08-24 13:38:43 +00:00
|
|
|
.. note:: A future version of Corda will allow the MQ broker to be split out of the main node and run as a
|
|
|
|
separate server. We may also support non-Artemis implementations via JMS, allowing the broker to be swapped
|
|
|
|
out for alternative implementations.
|
2015-12-14 17:22:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-08-24 13:38:43 +00:00
|
|
|
There are multiple ways of interacting with the network. When writing an application you typically won't use the
|
2016-11-22 16:30:17 +00:00
|
|
|
messaging subsystem directly. Instead you will build on top of the :doc:`flow framework <flow-state-machines>`,
|
|
|
|
which adds a layer on top of raw messaging to manage multi-step flows and let you think in terms of identities
|
2016-08-24 13:38:43 +00:00
|
|
|
rather than specific network endpoints.
|
2015-12-14 17:22:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-08-24 13:38:43 +00:00
|
|
|
Messaging types
|
|
|
|
---------------
|
2015-12-14 17:22:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-08-24 13:38:43 +00:00
|
|
|
Every ``Message`` object has an associated *topic* and may have a *session ID*. These are wrapped in a ``TopicSession``.
|
|
|
|
An implementation of ``MessagingService`` can be used to create messages and send them. You can get access to the
|
|
|
|
messaging service via the ``ServiceHub`` object that is provided to your app. Endpoints on the network are
|
|
|
|
identified at the lowest level using ``SingleMessageRecipient`` which may be e.g. an IP address, or in future
|
|
|
|
versions perhaps a routing path through the network.
|
2015-12-14 17:22:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-27 16:58:39 +00:00
|
|
|
Network Map Service
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supporting the messaging layer is a network map service, which is responsible for tracking public nodes on the network.
|
|
|
|
|
2016-08-24 13:38:43 +00:00
|
|
|
Nodes have an internal component, the network map cache, which contains a copy of the network map (which is just a
|
|
|
|
document). When a node starts up its cache fetches a copy of the full network map, and requests to be notified of
|
|
|
|
changes. The node then registers itself with the network map service, and the service notifies subscribers that a new
|
|
|
|
node has joined the network. Nodes do not automatically deregister themselves, so (for example) nodes going offline
|
|
|
|
briefly for maintenance are retained in the network map, and messages for them will be queued, minimising disruption.
|
2016-04-27 16:58:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-08-24 13:38:43 +00:00
|
|
|
Nodes submit signed changes to the map service, which then forwards update notifications on to nodes which have
|
|
|
|
requested to be notified of changes.
|
2016-04-27 16:58:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-08-24 13:38:43 +00:00
|
|
|
The network map currently supports:
|
2016-04-27 16:58:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Looking up nodes by service
|
|
|
|
* Looking up node for a party
|
|
|
|
* Suggesting a node providing a specific service, based on suitability for a contract and parties, for example suggesting
|
2016-08-24 13:38:43 +00:00
|
|
|
an appropriate interest rates oracle for a interest rate swap contract. Currently no recommendation logic is in place.
|
|
|
|
The code simply picks the first registered node that supports the required service.
|