2017-06-05 12:37:23 +00:00
|
|
|
API: States
|
|
|
|
===========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. note:: Before reading this page, you should be familiar with the key concepts of :doc:`key-concepts-states`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ContractState
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
In Corda, states are classes that implement ``ContractState``. The ``ContractState`` interface is defined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. literalinclude:: ../../core/src/main/kotlin/net/corda/core/contracts/Structures.kt
|
|
|
|
:language: kotlin
|
|
|
|
:start-after: DOCSTART 1
|
|
|
|
:end-before: DOCEND 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ``contract`` is the ``Contract`` class defining the constraints on transactions involving states of this type
|
|
|
|
* ``participants`` is a ``List`` of the ``AbstractParty`` who are considered to have a stake in the state. For example,
|
|
|
|
all the ``participants`` will:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Need to sign a notary-change transaction for this state
|
|
|
|
* Receive any committed transactions involving this state as part of ``FinalityFlow``
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The vault
|
|
|
|
---------
|
|
|
|
Each node has a vault, where it stores the states that are "relevant" to the node's owner. Whenever the node sees a
|
|
|
|
new transaction, it performs a relevancy check to decide whether to add each of the transaction's output states to
|
|
|
|
its vault. The default vault implementation decides whether a state is relevant as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The vault will store any state for which it is one of the ``participants``
|
|
|
|
* This behavior is overridden for states that implement ``LinearState`` or ``OwnableState`` (see below)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a state is not considered relevant, the node will still store the transaction in its local storage, but it will
|
|
|
|
not track the transaction's states in its vault.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ContractState sub-interfaces
|
|
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
There are two common optional sub-interfaces of ``ContractState``:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ``LinearState``, which helps represent objects that have a constant identity over time
|
|
|
|
* ``OwnableState``, which helps represent fungible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, a cash is an ``OwnableState`` - you don't have a specific piece of cash you are tracking over time, but
|
|
|
|
rather a total amount of cash that you can combine and divide at will. A contract, on the other hand, cannot be
|
|
|
|
merged with other contracts of the same type - it has a unique separate identity over time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We can picture the hierarchy as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. image:: resources/state-hierarchy.png
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LinearState
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
``LinearState`` models facts that have a constant identity over time. Remember that in Corda, states are immutable and
|
|
|
|
can't be updated directly. Instead, we represent an evolving fact as a sequence of states where every state is a
|
|
|
|
``LinearState`` that shares the same ``linearId``. Each sequence of linear states represents the lifecycle of a given
|
|
|
|
fact up to the current point in time. It represents the historic audit trail of how the fact evolved over time to its
|
|
|
|
current "state".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ``LinearState`` interface is defined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. literalinclude:: ../../core/src/main/kotlin/net/corda/core/contracts/Structures.kt
|
|
|
|
:language: kotlin
|
|
|
|
:start-after: DOCSTART 2
|
|
|
|
:end-before: DOCEND 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ``linearId`` is a ``UniqueIdentifier`` that:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Allows the successive versions of the fact to be linked over time
|
|
|
|
* Provides an ``externalId`` for referencing the state in external systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ``isRelevant(ourKeys: Set<PublicKey>)`` overrides the default vault implementation's relevancy check. You would
|
|
|
|
generally override it to check whether ``ourKeys`` is relevant to the state at hand in some way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The vault tracks the head (i.e. the most recent version) of each ``LinearState`` chain (i.e. each sequence of
|
|
|
|
states all sharing a ``linearId``). To create a transaction updating a ``LinearState``, we retrieve the state from the
|
|
|
|
vault using its ``linearId``.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-07 15:14:01 +00:00
|
|
|
UniqueIdentifier
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
``UniqueIdentifier`` is a combination of a (Java) ``UUID`` representing a globally unique 128 bit random number, and
|
|
|
|
an arbitrary string which can be paired with it. For instance the string may represent an existing "weak" (not
|
|
|
|
guaranteed unique) identifier for convenience purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-05 12:37:23 +00:00
|
|
|
OwnableState
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
``OwnableState`` models fungible assets. Fungible assets are assets for which it's the total amount held that is
|
|
|
|
important, rather than the actual units held. US dollars are an example of a fungible asset - we do not track the
|
|
|
|
individual dollar bills held, but rather the total amount of dollars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ``OwnableState`` interface is defined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. literalinclude:: ../../core/src/main/kotlin/net/corda/core/contracts/Structures.kt
|
|
|
|
:language: kotlin
|
|
|
|
:start-after: DOCSTART 3
|
|
|
|
:end-before: DOCEND 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ``owner`` is the ``PublicKey`` of the asset's owner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ``OwnableState`` also override the default behavior of the vault's relevancy check. The default vault
|
2017-06-07 15:14:01 +00:00
|
|
|
implementation will track any ``OwnableState`` of which it is the owner.
|
2017-06-05 12:37:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-08-11 13:30:48 +00:00
|
|
|
* ``withNewOwner(newOwner: AbstractParty)`` creates an identical copy of the state, only with a new owner
|
2017-06-05 12:37:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other interfaces
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
``ContractState`` has several more sub-interfaces that can optionally be implemented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ``QueryableState``, which allows the state to be queried in the node's database using SQL (see
|
2017-06-21 12:55:48 +00:00
|
|
|
:doc:`api-persistence`)
|
2017-06-05 12:37:23 +00:00
|
|
|
* ``SchedulableState``, which allows us to schedule future actions for the state (e.g. a coupon on a bond) (see
|
|
|
|
:doc:`event-scheduling`)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User-defined fields
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
Beyond implementing ``LinearState`` or ``OwnableState``, the definition of the state is up to the CorDapp developer.
|
|
|
|
You can define any additional class fields and methods you see fit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, here is a relatively complex state definition, for a state representing cash:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-21 15:40:28 +00:00
|
|
|
.. literalinclude:: ../../finance/src/main/kotlin/net/corda/finance/contracts/asset/Cash.kt
|
2017-06-05 12:37:23 +00:00
|
|
|
:language: kotlin
|
|
|
|
:start-after: DOCSTART 1
|
|
|
|
:end-before: DOCEND 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TransactionState
|
|
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
When a ``ContractState`` is added to a ``TransactionBuilder``, it is wrapped in a ``TransactionState``:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. literalinclude:: ../../core/src/main/kotlin/net/corda/core/contracts/Structures.kt
|
|
|
|
:language: kotlin
|
|
|
|
:start-after: DOCSTART 4
|
|
|
|
:end-before: DOCEND 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ``data`` is the state to be stored on-ledger
|
|
|
|
* ``notary`` is the notary service for this state
|
|
|
|
* ``encumbrance`` points to another state that must also appear as an input to any transaction consuming this
|
2017-08-11 13:30:48 +00:00
|
|
|
state
|