mirror of
https://github.com/zerotier/ZeroTierOne.git
synced 2024-12-18 20:47:53 +00:00
commit
7640801952
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Check out the [blog](http://blog.zerotier.com/) for announcements, in-depth arti
|
|||||||
**A:** For starters, try opening iTunes if you have it installed. If others are also online and sharing their collections, you might see them. If you have any games that run over a LAN (except those that require IPX), try those. What else can you think of to do on a completely flat, open network? Collaborative software development? Remote debugging? Transferring files using simple drive shares? Sharing your desktop printer to someone on another continent? Use your imagination.
|
**A:** For starters, try opening iTunes if you have it installed. If others are also online and sharing their collections, you might see them. If you have any games that run over a LAN (except those that require IPX), try those. What else can you think of to do on a completely flat, open network? Collaborative software development? Remote debugging? Transferring files using simple drive shares? Sharing your desktop printer to someone on another continent? Use your imagination.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Q:** Why do I get an IP address in the 27.0.0.0 or 28.0.0.0 range? And why does a lookup claim these addresses belong to the U.S. Department of Defense?
|
**Q:** Why do I get an IP address in the 27.0.0.0 or 28.0.0.0 range? And why does a lookup claim these addresses belong to the U.S. Department of Defense?
|
||||||
**A:** Short answer: because IPv4 needs to die. Long answer: the Earth network assigns IPv4 IPs from these ranges. They do in fact belong to the DOD, but they are *not* routed to the open Internet. The DOD owns them but uses them internally for private networks. As a result, there is nothing *technically* wrong with "bogarting" these for our own private network. It's considered bad practice, but if you want a private address space in IPv4 that is unlikely to overlap other private address spaces (like 10/8 and 192.168/16), it's the only way. [Cellular carriers](http://www.androidcentral.com/sprint-internet-dept-defense-and-you) and [cable companies](http://www.dslreports/forum/r25679029-Why-is-my-first-hop-to-a-DoD-assigned-IP-address-) frequently do the same thing.
|
**A:** Short answer: because IPv4 needs to die. Long answer: the Earth network assigns IPv4 IPs from these ranges. They do in fact belong to the DOD, but they are *not* routed to the open Internet. The DOD owns them but uses them internally for private networks. As a result, there is nothing *technically* wrong with "bogarting" these for our own private network. It's considered bad practice, but if you want a private address space in IPv4 that is unlikely to overlap other private address spaces (like 10/8 and 192.168/16), it's the only way. [Cellular carriers](http://www.androidcentral.com/sprint-internet-dept-defense-and-you) and [cable companies](http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r25679029-Why-is-my-first-hop-to-a-DoD-assigned-IP-address-) frequently do the same thing.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Q:** Is IPv6 supported?
|
**Q:** Is IPv6 supported?
|
||||||
**A:** Yes. IPv6 link-local addresses (those in the fe80::/10 block) are auto-assigned and should work fine. No other IPv6 addresses are assigned *yet*, but there are plans to do interesting things in this area in the future.
|
**A:** Yes. IPv6 link-local addresses (those in the fe80::/10 block) are auto-assigned and should work fine. No other IPv6 addresses are assigned *yet*, but there are plans to do interesting things in this area in the future.
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user