From ce92adcb9bcaba4894b58a26b2a10b11ef249c0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: van Hauser Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 08:33:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] formatting --- llvm_mode/afl-clang-fast.c | 3 ++- src/afl-forkserver.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/llvm_mode/afl-clang-fast.c b/llvm_mode/afl-clang-fast.c index e311a65e..37af0dfc 100644 --- a/llvm_mode/afl-clang-fast.c +++ b/llvm_mode/afl-clang-fast.c @@ -1011,7 +1011,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp) { #ifdef AFL_CLANG_FLTO SAYF( "\nafl-clang-lto specific environment variables:\n" - "AFL_LLVM_MAP_ADDR: use a fixed coverage map address (speed), e.g. 0x10000\n" + "AFL_LLVM_MAP_ADDR: use a fixed coverage map address (speed), e.g. " + "0x10000\n" "AFL_LLVM_LTO_DONTWRITEID: don't write the highest ID used to a " "global var\n" "AFL_LLVM_LTO_STARTID: from which ID to start counting from for a " diff --git a/src/afl-forkserver.c b/src/afl-forkserver.c index 33dfde97..25983f26 100644 --- a/src/afl-forkserver.c +++ b/src/afl-forkserver.c @@ -875,7 +875,8 @@ void afl_fsrv_start(afl_forkserver_t *fsrv, char **argv, " - the target was compiled with afl-clang-lto and a constructor " "was\n" " instrumented, recompiling without AFL_LLVM_MAP_ADDR might solve " - "your problem\n\n" + "your \n" + " problem\n\n" " - Less likely, there is a horrible bug in the fuzzer. If other " "options\n"