http->https

This commit is contained in:
vanhauser-thc
2021-11-06 10:28:22 +01:00
parent ddc930f5ff
commit 9325a4fcbb
70 changed files with 85 additions and 86 deletions

View File

@ -2760,7 +2760,7 @@ sending a mail to <afl-users+subscribe@googlegroups.com>.
- Updated the documentation and added notes_for_asan.txt. Based on feedback
from Hanno Boeck, Ben Laurie, and others.
- Moved the project to http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/.
- Moved the project to https://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/.
### Version 0.46b:

View File

@ -150,4 +150,4 @@ sysctl kern.sysv.shmseg=48
sysctl kern.sysv.shmall=98304
```
See [http://www.spy-hill.com/help/apple/SharedMemory.html](http://www.spy-hill.com/help/apple/SharedMemory.html) for documentation for these settings and how to make them permanent.
See [https://www.spy-hill.com/help/apple/SharedMemory.html](https://www.spy-hill.com/help/apple/SharedMemory.html) for documentation for these settings and how to make them permanent.

View File

@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ Four steps are required to do this and it also requires quite some knowledge of
Follow this document on how to do this: [instrumentation/README.instrument_list.md](../instrumentation/README.instrument_list.md).
If `PCGUARD` is used, then you need to follow this guide (needs llvm 12+!):
[http://clang.llvm.org/docs/SanitizerCoverage.html#partially-disabling-instrumentation](http://clang.llvm.org/docs/SanitizerCoverage.html#partially-disabling-instrumentation)
[https://clang.llvm.org/docs/SanitizerCoverage.html#partially-disabling-instrumentation](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/SanitizerCoverage.html#partially-disabling-instrumentation)
Only exclude those functions from instrumentation that provide no value for coverage - that is if it does not process any fuzz data directly or indirectly (e.g. hash maps, thread management etc.).
If however a function directly or indirectly handles fuzz data, then you should not put the function in a deny instrumentation list and rather live with the instability it comes with.

View File

@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Any existing output directory can be also used to resume aborted jobs; try:
If you have gnuplot installed, you can also generate some pretty graphs for any
active fuzzing task using afl-plot. For an example of how this looks like,
see [http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/plot/](http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/plot/).
see [https://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/plot/](https://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/plot/).
You can also manually build and install afl-plot-ui, which is a helper utility
for showing the graphs generated by afl-plot in a graphical window using GTK.

View File

@ -31,6 +31,6 @@ Here are some of the most important caveats for AFL:
[https://www.fastly.com/blog/how-to-fuzz-server-american-fuzzy-lop](https://www.fastly.com/blog/how-to-fuzz-server-american-fuzzy-lop)
- Occasionally, sentient machines rise against their creators. If this
happens to you, please consult [http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/prep/](http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/prep/).
happens to you, please consult [https://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/prep/](https://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/prep/).
Beyond this, see [INSTALL.md](INSTALL.md) for platform-specific tips.

View File

@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ instruction manual.
Allows fuzz-testing of Python programs. Uses custom instrumentation and its
own forkserver.
http://jwilk.net/software/python-afl
https://jwilk.net/software/python-afl
### Go-fuzz (Dmitry Vyukov)
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ https://github.com/kmcallister/afl.rs
Adds AFL-compatible instrumentation to OCaml programs.
https://github.com/ocamllabs/opam-repo-dev/pull/23
http://canopy.mirage.io/Posts/Fuzzing
https://canopy.mirage.io/Posts/Fuzzing
### AFL for GCJ Java and other GCC frontends (-)
@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ some programs to be fuzzed without the fork / execve overhead. (Similar
functionality is now available as the "persistent" feature described in
[the llvm_mode readme](../instrumentation/README.llvm.md))
http://llvm.org/docs/LibFuzzer.html
https://llvm.org/docs/LibFuzzer.html
## TriforceAFL (Tim Newsham and Jesse Hertz)
@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ https://github.com/bshastry/afl-sancov
Makes it easy to estimate memory usage limits when fuzzing with ASAN or MSAN.
http://jwilk.net/software/recidivm
https://jwilk.net/software/recidivm
### aflize (Jacek Wielemborek)
@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ https://goo.gl/j9EgFf
A simple SQL shell designed specifically for fuzzing the underlying library.
http://www.sqlite.org/src/artifact/9e7e273da2030371
https://www.sqlite.org/src/artifact/9e7e273da2030371
### Support for Python mutation modules (Christian Holler)
@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ A similar guided approach as applied to fuzzing syscalls:
https://github.com/google/syzkaller/wiki/Found-Bugs
https://github.com/dvyukov/linux/commit/33787098ffaaa83b8a7ccf519913ac5fd6125931
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/AFL%20filesystem%20fuzzing%2C%20Vault%202016_0.pdf
https://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/AFL%20filesystem%20fuzzing%2C%20Vault%202016_0.pdf
### Kernel Snapshot Fuzzing using Unicornafl (Security in Telecommunications)

View File

@ -161,8 +161,8 @@ features of the underlying data format, as shown in this image:
Several practical examples of the results of this algorithm are discussed
here:
http://lcamtuf.blogspot.com/2014/11/pulling-jpegs-out-of-thin-air.html
http://lcamtuf.blogspot.com/2014/11/afl-fuzz-nobody-expects-cdata-sections.html
https://lcamtuf.blogspot.com/2014/11/pulling-jpegs-out-of-thin-air.html
https://lcamtuf.blogspot.com/2014/11/afl-fuzz-nobody-expects-cdata-sections.html
The synthetic corpus produced by this process is essentially a compact
collection of "hmm, this does something new!" input files, and can be used to
@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ value of various fuzzing strategies and optimize their parameters so that they
work equally well across a wide range of file types. The strategies used by
afl-fuzz are generally format-agnostic and are discussed in more detail here:
http://lcamtuf.blogspot.com/2014/08/binary-fuzzing-strategies-what-works.html
https://lcamtuf.blogspot.com/2014/08/binary-fuzzing-strategies-what-works.html
It is somewhat notable that especially early on, most of the work done by
`afl-fuzz` is actually highly deterministic, and progresses to random stacked
@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ valid grammar for the tested parser.
A discussion of how these features are implemented within afl-fuzz can be found
here:
http://lcamtuf.blogspot.com/2015/01/afl-fuzz-making-up-grammar-with.html
https://lcamtuf.blogspot.com/2015/01/afl-fuzz-making-up-grammar-with.html
In essence, when basic, typically easily-obtained syntax tokens are combined
together in a purely random manner, the instrumentation and the evolutionary
@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ thrown away.
A detailed discussion of the value of this approach can be found here:
http://lcamtuf.blogspot.com/2014/11/afl-fuzz-crash-exploration-mode.html
https://lcamtuf.blogspot.com/2014/11/afl-fuzz-crash-exploration-mode.html
The method uses instrumentation feedback to explore the state of the crashing
program to get past the ambiguous faulting condition and then isolate the
@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ goes through `execve()`, linking, and libc initialization only once, and is then
cloned from a stopped process image by leveraging copy-on-write. The
implementation is described in more detail here:
http://lcamtuf.blogspot.com/2014/10/fuzzing-binaries-without-execve.html
https://lcamtuf.blogspot.com/2014/10/fuzzing-binaries-without-execve.html
The fork server is an integral aspect of the injected instrumentation and
simply stops at the first instrumented function to await commands from